争论是人工智能体辩论中问题两极分化的驱动因素

J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.18564/jasss.4767

Felix Kopecky

{"title":"争论是人工智能体辩论中问题两极分化的驱动因素","authors":"Felix Kopecky","doi":"10.18564/jasss.4767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Canargumentsand theirproperties influence thedevelopmentof issuepolarisation indebatesamong artificial agents? This paper presents an agent-based model of debates with logical constraints based on the theory of dialectical structures. Simulations on thismodel reveal that the exchange of arguments can drive polarisation evenwithout social influence, and that the usage of di erent argumentation strategies can influence the obtained levels of polarisation.","PeriodicalId":14675,"journal":{"name":"J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Arguments as Drivers of Issue Polarisation in Debates Among Artificial Agents\",\"authors\":\"Felix Kopecky\",\"doi\":\"10.18564/jasss.4767\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Canargumentsand theirproperties influence thedevelopmentof issuepolarisation indebatesamong artificial agents? This paper presents an agent-based model of debates with logical constraints based on the theory of dialectical structures. Simulations on thismodel reveal that the exchange of arguments can drive polarisation evenwithout social influence, and that the usage of di erent argumentation strategies can influence the obtained levels of polarisation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.4767\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.4767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

论点及其性质能否影响人工智能体之间问题极化辩论的发展?本文以辩证结构理论为基础，提出了一种基于主体的逻辑约束辩论模型。对该模型的模拟表明，即使没有社会影响，争论的交换也可以驱动极化，并且不同辩论策略的使用会影响所获得的极化水平。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Arguments as Drivers of Issue Polarisation in Debates Among Artificial Agents

Canargumentsand theirproperties influence thedevelopmentof issuepolarisation indebatesamong artificial agents? This paper presents an agent-based model of debates with logical constraints based on the theory of dialectical structures. Simulations on thismodel reveal that the exchange of arguments can drive polarisation evenwithout social influence, and that the usage of di erent argumentation strategies can influence the obtained levels of polarisation.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.

自引率

0.00%

发文量