胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂与钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂治疗2型糖尿病患者动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病

IF 1.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Hidekatsu Yanai, Hiroki Adachi, Mariko Hakoshima, Hisayuki Katsuyama
{"title":"胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂与钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂治疗2型糖尿病患者动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病","authors":"Hidekatsu Yanai,&nbsp;Hiroki Adachi,&nbsp;Mariko Hakoshima,&nbsp;Hisayuki Katsuyama","doi":"10.14740/cr1459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Beyond improving hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in adults with type 2 diabetes, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) have been approved for reducing risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) with established cardiovascular disease (CVD) or multiple CV risk factors. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) also reduced the risk for the primary composite CV outcome in patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk for CV events. In the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and European Association of Study in Diabetes (EASD) consensus report 2022, there is the description \"In people with established atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD) or with a high risk for ASCVD, GLP-1RA were prioritized over SGLT2i\"; however, the evidence supporting such statement is limited. Therefore, we studied the superiority of GLP-1RA over SGLT2i for prevention of ASCVD from various viewpoints. We could not find a meaningful difference in the risk reduction in three-point MACE (3P-MACE), mortality due to any cause, mortality due to CV cause and nonfatal myocardial infarction between GLP-1RA and SGLT2i trials. The risk of nonfatal stroke decreased in all five GLP-1RA trials; however, two of three SGLT2i trials showed an increase in risk of nonfatal stroke. The risk of hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) decreased in all three SGLT2i trials, and one GLP-1RA trial showed an increase in risk of HHF. The risk reduction of HHF in SGLT2i trials was greater than that in GLP-1RA trials. These findings were consistent with current systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The risk reduction of 3P-MACE was significantly and negatively correlated with changes in HbA1c (R = -0.861, P = 0.006) and body weight (R = -0.895, P = 0.003) in GLP-1RA and SGLT2i trials. The studies using SGLT2i failed to reduce carotid intima media thickness (cIMT), the surrogate marker for atherosclerosis; however, several studies using GLP-1RA successfully reduced cIMT in patients with type 2 diabetes. Compared with SGLT2i, GLP-1RA had a higher probability of decreasing serum triglyceride. GLP-1RA have multiple vascular biological anti-atherogenic properties.</p>","PeriodicalId":9424,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research","volume":"14 1","pages":"12-21"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/89/5e/cr-14-012.PMC9990545.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists Versus Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Hidekatsu Yanai,&nbsp;Hiroki Adachi,&nbsp;Mariko Hakoshima,&nbsp;Hisayuki Katsuyama\",\"doi\":\"10.14740/cr1459\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Beyond improving hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in adults with type 2 diabetes, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) have been approved for reducing risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) with established cardiovascular disease (CVD) or multiple CV risk factors. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) also reduced the risk for the primary composite CV outcome in patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk for CV events. In the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and European Association of Study in Diabetes (EASD) consensus report 2022, there is the description \\\"In people with established atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD) or with a high risk for ASCVD, GLP-1RA were prioritized over SGLT2i\\\"; however, the evidence supporting such statement is limited. Therefore, we studied the superiority of GLP-1RA over SGLT2i for prevention of ASCVD from various viewpoints. We could not find a meaningful difference in the risk reduction in three-point MACE (3P-MACE), mortality due to any cause, mortality due to CV cause and nonfatal myocardial infarction between GLP-1RA and SGLT2i trials. The risk of nonfatal stroke decreased in all five GLP-1RA trials; however, two of three SGLT2i trials showed an increase in risk of nonfatal stroke. The risk of hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) decreased in all three SGLT2i trials, and one GLP-1RA trial showed an increase in risk of HHF. The risk reduction of HHF in SGLT2i trials was greater than that in GLP-1RA trials. These findings were consistent with current systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The risk reduction of 3P-MACE was significantly and negatively correlated with changes in HbA1c (R = -0.861, P = 0.006) and body weight (R = -0.895, P = 0.003) in GLP-1RA and SGLT2i trials. The studies using SGLT2i failed to reduce carotid intima media thickness (cIMT), the surrogate marker for atherosclerosis; however, several studies using GLP-1RA successfully reduced cIMT in patients with type 2 diabetes. Compared with SGLT2i, GLP-1RA had a higher probability of decreasing serum triglyceride. GLP-1RA have multiple vascular biological anti-atherogenic properties.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology Research\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"12-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/89/5e/cr-14-012.PMC9990545.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14740/cr1459\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/cr1459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

除了改善成人2型糖尿病患者的血红蛋白A1c (HbA1c)外,胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)已被批准用于降低已确定心血管疾病(CVD)或多种心血管危险因素的主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的风险。钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i)也降低了CV事件高风险的2型糖尿病患者的主要复合CV结局的风险。在美国糖尿病协会(ADA)和欧洲糖尿病研究协会(EASD) 2022年共识报告中,有这样的描述:“在已确诊的动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)或ASCVD高风险人群中,GLP-1RA优先于SGLT2i”;然而,支持这种说法的证据是有限的。因此,我们从多个角度研究GLP-1RA相对于SGLT2i在预防ASCVD方面的优势。我们没有发现GLP-1RA和SGLT2i试验在三点MACE (3P-MACE)、任何原因导致的死亡率、CV原因导致的死亡率和非致死性心肌梗死的风险降低方面有显著差异。在所有五项GLP-1RA试验中,非致死性卒中的风险都降低了;然而,三分之二的SGLT2i试验显示非致命性中风的风险增加。在所有三项SGLT2i试验中,因心力衰竭(HHF)住院的风险降低,而一项GLP-1RA试验显示HHF的风险增加。与GLP-1RA试验相比,SGLT2i试验中HHF的风险降低幅度更大。这些发现与当前的系统综述和荟萃分析一致。在GLP-1RA和SGLT2i试验中,3P-MACE的风险降低与HbA1c (R = -0.861, P = 0.006)和体重(R = -0.895, P = 0.003)的变化呈显著负相关。使用SGLT2i的研究未能降低颈动脉内膜中膜厚度(cIMT),这是动脉粥样硬化的替代指标;然而,一些使用GLP-1RA的研究成功地降低了2型糖尿病患者的cIMT。与SGLT2i相比,GLP-1RA降低血清甘油三酯的可能性更高。GLP-1RA具有多种血管生物抗动脉粥样硬化特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists Versus Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.

Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists Versus Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.

Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists Versus Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.

Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists Versus Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.

Beyond improving hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in adults with type 2 diabetes, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) have been approved for reducing risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) with established cardiovascular disease (CVD) or multiple CV risk factors. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) also reduced the risk for the primary composite CV outcome in patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk for CV events. In the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and European Association of Study in Diabetes (EASD) consensus report 2022, there is the description "In people with established atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD) or with a high risk for ASCVD, GLP-1RA were prioritized over SGLT2i"; however, the evidence supporting such statement is limited. Therefore, we studied the superiority of GLP-1RA over SGLT2i for prevention of ASCVD from various viewpoints. We could not find a meaningful difference in the risk reduction in three-point MACE (3P-MACE), mortality due to any cause, mortality due to CV cause and nonfatal myocardial infarction between GLP-1RA and SGLT2i trials. The risk of nonfatal stroke decreased in all five GLP-1RA trials; however, two of three SGLT2i trials showed an increase in risk of nonfatal stroke. The risk of hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) decreased in all three SGLT2i trials, and one GLP-1RA trial showed an increase in risk of HHF. The risk reduction of HHF in SGLT2i trials was greater than that in GLP-1RA trials. These findings were consistent with current systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The risk reduction of 3P-MACE was significantly and negatively correlated with changes in HbA1c (R = -0.861, P = 0.006) and body weight (R = -0.895, P = 0.003) in GLP-1RA and SGLT2i trials. The studies using SGLT2i failed to reduce carotid intima media thickness (cIMT), the surrogate marker for atherosclerosis; however, several studies using GLP-1RA successfully reduced cIMT in patients with type 2 diabetes. Compared with SGLT2i, GLP-1RA had a higher probability of decreasing serum triglyceride. GLP-1RA have multiple vascular biological anti-atherogenic properties.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiology Research
Cardiology Research CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Cardiology Research is an open access, peer-reviewed, international journal. All submissions relating to basic research and clinical practice of cardiology and cardiovascular medicine are in this journal''s scope. This journal focuses on publishing original research and observations in all cardiovascular medicine aspects. Manuscript types include original article, review, case report, short communication, book review, letter to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信