鼻呼吸刺激器联合口腔器械治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的发展与效果

Arisa Sawa, Hiroshi Suzuki, H. Niwa, Tatsuo Yagi, S. Oguchi, Y. Makiyama, C. Chow, O. Komiyama
{"title":"鼻呼吸刺激器联合口腔器械治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的发展与效果","authors":"Arisa Sawa, Hiroshi Suzuki, H. Niwa, Tatsuo Yagi, S. Oguchi, Y. Makiyama, C. Chow, O. Komiyama","doi":"10.5466/IJOMS.19.232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Many obstructive sleep apnea(OSA)patients have nasal obstruction. Further, most patients discontinue wearing an oral appliance(OA)for improving respiration due to nasal obstruction. We aimed to develop a nasal breathing stimulator(NBS)for use in combination with an OA to promote nasal breathing. Methods: Thirteen OSA patients wore a NBS, Max-Air Nose Corns ® , Mute with hole ® , which expands the nasal cavity from the inside, and Breathe Right ® , which expands the nasal cavity from the outside, and compared the resultant changes in respiratory measures with those when a device was not used. The inspiratory flow rate(peak nasal inspiratory flow: PNIF)and visual analogue scale(VAS)scores were measured under five conditions. Furthermore, PNIF was measured under four conditions: OA(-)NBS(-), OA(+)NBS(-), OA(-)NBS(+), and OA(+)NBS(+), and a sleep test was performed. Results: PNIF was significantly higher when wearing an NBS compared with the other four devices(p < 0.001). In addition, PNIF was significantly higher in OA(+)NBS(+) than that in the other three conditions(p < 0.001), and OA(+)NBS(+)improved the respiratory disturbance index(p < 0.001), lowest SpO 2( p < 0.001), and Epworth sleepiness scale(ESS)score(p < 0.001)on the sleep test. Discussion: Wearing the NBS improved breathing in patients who did not benefit from OA treatment alone and in those who discontinued OA use due to nasal obstruction.","PeriodicalId":14196,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Oral-Medical Sciences","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and the Effectiveness of a Nasal Breathing Stimulator Combined with an Oral Appliance for Treating Obstructive Sleep Apnea\",\"authors\":\"Arisa Sawa, Hiroshi Suzuki, H. Niwa, Tatsuo Yagi, S. Oguchi, Y. Makiyama, C. Chow, O. Komiyama\",\"doi\":\"10.5466/IJOMS.19.232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Many obstructive sleep apnea(OSA)patients have nasal obstruction. Further, most patients discontinue wearing an oral appliance(OA)for improving respiration due to nasal obstruction. We aimed to develop a nasal breathing stimulator(NBS)for use in combination with an OA to promote nasal breathing. Methods: Thirteen OSA patients wore a NBS, Max-Air Nose Corns ® , Mute with hole ® , which expands the nasal cavity from the inside, and Breathe Right ® , which expands the nasal cavity from the outside, and compared the resultant changes in respiratory measures with those when a device was not used. The inspiratory flow rate(peak nasal inspiratory flow: PNIF)and visual analogue scale(VAS)scores were measured under five conditions. Furthermore, PNIF was measured under four conditions: OA(-)NBS(-), OA(+)NBS(-), OA(-)NBS(+), and OA(+)NBS(+), and a sleep test was performed. Results: PNIF was significantly higher when wearing an NBS compared with the other four devices(p < 0.001). In addition, PNIF was significantly higher in OA(+)NBS(+) than that in the other three conditions(p < 0.001), and OA(+)NBS(+)improved the respiratory disturbance index(p < 0.001), lowest SpO 2( p < 0.001), and Epworth sleepiness scale(ESS)score(p < 0.001)on the sleep test. Discussion: Wearing the NBS improved breathing in patients who did not benefit from OA treatment alone and in those who discontinued OA use due to nasal obstruction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Oral-Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Oral-Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5466/IJOMS.19.232\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Oral-Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5466/IJOMS.19.232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:许多阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者存在鼻塞。此外,大多数患者由于鼻塞而停止佩戴口腔矫治器(OA)以改善呼吸。我们的目标是开发一种鼻呼吸刺激器(NBS),用于与OA结合使用,以促进鼻腔呼吸。方法:13例OSA患者佩戴NBS、Max-Air鼻镜®、Mute with hole®(从内扩张鼻腔)和Breathe Right®(从外扩张鼻腔),比较其与未使用设备时呼吸测量的变化。测量5种情况下的吸气流量(峰值鼻吸气流量:PNIF)和视觉模拟评分(VAS)。此外,在OA(-)NBS(-)、OA(+)NBS(-)、OA(-)NBS(+)和OA(+)NBS(+)四种情况下测量PNIF,并进行睡眠测试。结果:与其他四种设备相比,佩戴NBS时PNIF明显更高(p < 0.001)。此外,OA(+)NBS(+)组的PNIF显著高于其他三种情况(p < 0.001), OA(+)NBS(+)组改善了睡眠测试的呼吸障碍指数(p < 0.001)、最低SpO 2(p < 0.001)和Epworth嗜睡量表(ESS)评分(p < 0.001)。讨论:佩戴NBS改善了没有从单独OA治疗中获益的患者以及因鼻塞而停止OA治疗的患者的呼吸。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and the Effectiveness of a Nasal Breathing Stimulator Combined with an Oral Appliance for Treating Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Objective: Many obstructive sleep apnea(OSA)patients have nasal obstruction. Further, most patients discontinue wearing an oral appliance(OA)for improving respiration due to nasal obstruction. We aimed to develop a nasal breathing stimulator(NBS)for use in combination with an OA to promote nasal breathing. Methods: Thirteen OSA patients wore a NBS, Max-Air Nose Corns ® , Mute with hole ® , which expands the nasal cavity from the inside, and Breathe Right ® , which expands the nasal cavity from the outside, and compared the resultant changes in respiratory measures with those when a device was not used. The inspiratory flow rate(peak nasal inspiratory flow: PNIF)and visual analogue scale(VAS)scores were measured under five conditions. Furthermore, PNIF was measured under four conditions: OA(-)NBS(-), OA(+)NBS(-), OA(-)NBS(+), and OA(+)NBS(+), and a sleep test was performed. Results: PNIF was significantly higher when wearing an NBS compared with the other four devices(p < 0.001). In addition, PNIF was significantly higher in OA(+)NBS(+) than that in the other three conditions(p < 0.001), and OA(+)NBS(+)improved the respiratory disturbance index(p < 0.001), lowest SpO 2( p < 0.001), and Epworth sleepiness scale(ESS)score(p < 0.001)on the sleep test. Discussion: Wearing the NBS improved breathing in patients who did not benefit from OA treatment alone and in those who discontinued OA use due to nasal obstruction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信