在 COVID-19 第一次大流行的高峰期和平缓期之间发生了什么变化?葡萄牙重症监护多中心队列研究。

Q2 Medicine
Rui Antunes Pereira, Marta Sousa, José Pedro Cidade, Luís Melo, Diogo Lopes, Sara Ventura, Irene Aragão, Raul Miguel de Freitas Lima Neto, Elena Molinos, Ana Marques, Nelson Cardoso, Flávio Marino, Filipa Brás Monteiro, Ana Pinho Oliveira, Rogério C Silva, André Miguel Neto Real, Bruno Sarmento Banheiro, Renato Reis, Maria Adão-Serrano, Ana Cracium, Ana Valadas, João Miguel Ribeiro, Pedro Póvoa, Camila Tapadinhas, Vítor Mendes, Luís Coelho, Raquel Maia, Paulo Telles Freitas, Isabel Amorim Ferreira, Tiago Ramires, Luís Silva Val-Flores, Mariana Cascão, Rita Alves, Simão C Rodeia, Cleide Barrigoto, Rosa Cardiga, Maria João Ferreira da Silva, Bruno Vale, Tatiana Fonseca, Ana Lúcia Rios, João Camões, Danay Pérez, Susana Cabral, Maria Inês Ribeiro, João João Mendes, João Gouveia, Susana Mendes Fernandes
{"title":"在 COVID-19 第一次大流行的高峰期和平缓期之间发生了什么变化?葡萄牙重症监护多中心队列研究。","authors":"Rui Antunes Pereira, Marta Sousa, José Pedro Cidade, Luís Melo, Diogo Lopes, Sara Ventura, Irene Aragão, Raul Miguel de Freitas Lima Neto, Elena Molinos, Ana Marques, Nelson Cardoso, Flávio Marino, Filipa Brás Monteiro, Ana Pinho Oliveira, Rogério C Silva, André Miguel Neto Real, Bruno Sarmento Banheiro, Renato Reis, Maria Adão-Serrano, Ana Cracium, Ana Valadas, João Miguel Ribeiro, Pedro Póvoa, Camila Tapadinhas, Vítor Mendes, Luís Coelho, Raquel Maia, Paulo Telles Freitas, Isabel Amorim Ferreira, Tiago Ramires, Luís Silva Val-Flores, Mariana Cascão, Rita Alves, Simão C Rodeia, Cleide Barrigoto, Rosa Cardiga, Maria João Ferreira da Silva, Bruno Vale, Tatiana Fonseca, Ana Lúcia Rios, João Camões, Danay Pérez, Susana Cabral, Maria Inês Ribeiro, João João Mendes, João Gouveia, Susana Mendes Fernandes","doi":"10.5935/0103-507X.20210037-pt","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze and compare COVID-19 patient characteristics, clinical management and outcomes between the peak and plateau periods of the first pandemic wave in Portugal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicentric ambispective cohort study including consecutive severe COVID-19 patients between March and August 2020 from 16 Portuguese intensive care units. The peak and plateau periods, respectively, weeks 10 - 16 and 17 - 34, were defined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five hundred forty-one adult patients with a median age of 65 [57 - 74] years, mostly male (71.2%), were included. There were no significant differences in median age (p = 0.3), Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (40 versus 39; p = 0.8), partial arterial oxygen pressure/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (139 versus 136; p = 0.6), antibiotic therapy (57% versus 64%; p = 0.2) at admission, or 28-day mortality (24.4% versus 22.8%; p = 0.7) between the peak and plateau periods. During the peak period, patients had fewer comorbidities (1 [0 - 3] versus 2 [0 - 5]; p = 0.002) and presented a higher use of vasopressors (47% versus 36%; p < 0.001) and invasive mechanical ventilation (58.1 versus 49.2%; p < 0.001) at admission, prone positioning (45% versus 36%; p = 0.04), and hydroxychloroquine (59% versus 10%; p < 0.001) and lopinavir/ritonavir (41% versus 10%; p < 0.001) prescriptions. However, a greater use of high-flow nasal cannulas (5% versus 16%, p < 0.001) on admission, remdesivir (0.3% versus 15%; p < 0.001) and corticosteroid (29% versus 52%, p < 0.001) therapy, and a shorter ICU length of stay (12 days versus 8, p < 0.001) were observed during the plateau.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were significant changes in patient comorbidities, intensive care unit therapies and length of stay between the peak and plateau periods of the first COVID-19 wave.</p>","PeriodicalId":53519,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva","volume":"34 4","pages":"433-442"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9987006/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What changed between the peak and plateau periods of the first COVID-19 pandemic wave? A multicentric Portuguese cohort study in intensive care.\",\"authors\":\"Rui Antunes Pereira, Marta Sousa, José Pedro Cidade, Luís Melo, Diogo Lopes, Sara Ventura, Irene Aragão, Raul Miguel de Freitas Lima Neto, Elena Molinos, Ana Marques, Nelson Cardoso, Flávio Marino, Filipa Brás Monteiro, Ana Pinho Oliveira, Rogério C Silva, André Miguel Neto Real, Bruno Sarmento Banheiro, Renato Reis, Maria Adão-Serrano, Ana Cracium, Ana Valadas, João Miguel Ribeiro, Pedro Póvoa, Camila Tapadinhas, Vítor Mendes, Luís Coelho, Raquel Maia, Paulo Telles Freitas, Isabel Amorim Ferreira, Tiago Ramires, Luís Silva Val-Flores, Mariana Cascão, Rita Alves, Simão C Rodeia, Cleide Barrigoto, Rosa Cardiga, Maria João Ferreira da Silva, Bruno Vale, Tatiana Fonseca, Ana Lúcia Rios, João Camões, Danay Pérez, Susana Cabral, Maria Inês Ribeiro, João João Mendes, João Gouveia, Susana Mendes Fernandes\",\"doi\":\"10.5935/0103-507X.20210037-pt\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze and compare COVID-19 patient characteristics, clinical management and outcomes between the peak and plateau periods of the first pandemic wave in Portugal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicentric ambispective cohort study including consecutive severe COVID-19 patients between March and August 2020 from 16 Portuguese intensive care units. The peak and plateau periods, respectively, weeks 10 - 16 and 17 - 34, were defined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five hundred forty-one adult patients with a median age of 65 [57 - 74] years, mostly male (71.2%), were included. There were no significant differences in median age (p = 0.3), Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (40 versus 39; p = 0.8), partial arterial oxygen pressure/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (139 versus 136; p = 0.6), antibiotic therapy (57% versus 64%; p = 0.2) at admission, or 28-day mortality (24.4% versus 22.8%; p = 0.7) between the peak and plateau periods. During the peak period, patients had fewer comorbidities (1 [0 - 3] versus 2 [0 - 5]; p = 0.002) and presented a higher use of vasopressors (47% versus 36%; p < 0.001) and invasive mechanical ventilation (58.1 versus 49.2%; p < 0.001) at admission, prone positioning (45% versus 36%; p = 0.04), and hydroxychloroquine (59% versus 10%; p < 0.001) and lopinavir/ritonavir (41% versus 10%; p < 0.001) prescriptions. However, a greater use of high-flow nasal cannulas (5% versus 16%, p < 0.001) on admission, remdesivir (0.3% versus 15%; p < 0.001) and corticosteroid (29% versus 52%, p < 0.001) therapy, and a shorter ICU length of stay (12 days versus 8, p < 0.001) were observed during the plateau.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were significant changes in patient comorbidities, intensive care unit therapies and length of stay between the peak and plateau periods of the first COVID-19 wave.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"433-442\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9987006/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20210037-pt\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20210037-pt","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的分析和比较葡萄牙第一次大流行高峰期和高原期的 COVID-19 患者特征、临床管理和预后:这是一项多中心前瞻性队列研究,包括 2020 年 3 月至 8 月期间葡萄牙 16 家重症监护病房的连续重症 COVID-19 患者。研究界定了高峰期和高原期,分别为第 10 - 16 周和第 17 - 34 周:共纳入 541 名成年患者,中位年龄为 65 [57 - 74] 岁,大部分为男性(71.2%)。入院时的中位年龄(p = 0.3)、简化急性生理学评分 II(40 对 39;p = 0.8)、动脉血氧分压/吸入氧分压比值(139 对 136;p = 0.6)、抗生素治疗(57% 对 64%;p = 0.2)或 28 天死亡率(24.4% 对 22.8%;p = 0.7)在高峰期和高原期之间没有明显差异。在高峰期,患者的合并症较少(1 [0 - 3] 对 2 [0 - 5];p = 0.002),使用血管加压剂(47% 对 36%;p < 0.001)和有创机械通气(58.1% 对 49.2%;p = 0.001)的比例较高。1 对 49.2%;p < 0.001)、俯卧位(45% 对 36%;p = 0.04)、羟氯喹(59% 对 10%;p < 0.001)和洛匹那韦/利托那韦(41% 对 10%;p < 0.001)处方。然而,在高原期观察到更多患者在入院时使用高流量鼻插管(5%对16%,P<0.001)、雷米替韦(0.3%对15%;P<0.001)和皮质类固醇(29%对52%,P<0.001)治疗,以及更短的ICU住院时间(12天对8天,P<0.001):结论:在第一轮 COVID-19 高峰期和高原期之间,患者的合并症、重症监护室疗法和住院时间都发生了重大变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

What changed between the peak and plateau periods of the first COVID-19 pandemic wave? A multicentric Portuguese cohort study in intensive care.

What changed between the peak and plateau periods of the first COVID-19 pandemic wave? A multicentric Portuguese cohort study in intensive care.

What changed between the peak and plateau periods of the first COVID-19 pandemic wave? A multicentric Portuguese cohort study in intensive care.

Objective: To analyze and compare COVID-19 patient characteristics, clinical management and outcomes between the peak and plateau periods of the first pandemic wave in Portugal.

Methods: This was a multicentric ambispective cohort study including consecutive severe COVID-19 patients between March and August 2020 from 16 Portuguese intensive care units. The peak and plateau periods, respectively, weeks 10 - 16 and 17 - 34, were defined.

Results: Five hundred forty-one adult patients with a median age of 65 [57 - 74] years, mostly male (71.2%), were included. There were no significant differences in median age (p = 0.3), Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (40 versus 39; p = 0.8), partial arterial oxygen pressure/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (139 versus 136; p = 0.6), antibiotic therapy (57% versus 64%; p = 0.2) at admission, or 28-day mortality (24.4% versus 22.8%; p = 0.7) between the peak and plateau periods. During the peak period, patients had fewer comorbidities (1 [0 - 3] versus 2 [0 - 5]; p = 0.002) and presented a higher use of vasopressors (47% versus 36%; p < 0.001) and invasive mechanical ventilation (58.1 versus 49.2%; p < 0.001) at admission, prone positioning (45% versus 36%; p = 0.04), and hydroxychloroquine (59% versus 10%; p < 0.001) and lopinavir/ritonavir (41% versus 10%; p < 0.001) prescriptions. However, a greater use of high-flow nasal cannulas (5% versus 16%, p < 0.001) on admission, remdesivir (0.3% versus 15%; p < 0.001) and corticosteroid (29% versus 52%, p < 0.001) therapy, and a shorter ICU length of stay (12 days versus 8, p < 0.001) were observed during the plateau.

Conclusion: There were significant changes in patient comorbidities, intensive care unit therapies and length of stay between the peak and plateau periods of the first COVID-19 wave.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信