E. Woodley, S. Barr, P. Stott, Pierrette Thomet, Sally Flint, Fiona Lovell, Evelyn O’Malley, D. Plews, C. Rapley, C. Robbins, Rebecca Pearce, Rebecca Sandover
{"title":"气候故事:在气候科学传播中启用和维持艺术干预","authors":"E. Woodley, S. Barr, P. Stott, Pierrette Thomet, Sally Flint, Fiona Lovell, Evelyn O’Malley, D. Plews, C. Rapley, C. Robbins, Rebecca Pearce, Rebecca Sandover","doi":"10.5194/gc-5-339-2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The climate science community faces a major challenge with respect to communicating the\nrisks associated with climate change within a heavily politicised landscape that is\ncharacterised by varying degrees of denial, scepticism, distrust in\nscientific enterprise, and an increased prevalence of misinformation (“fake\nnews”). This issue is particularly significant given the reliance on\nconventional “deficit” communication approaches, which are based on the\nassumption that scientific information provision will necessarily lead to\ndesired behavioural changes. Indeed, the constrained orthodoxy of scientific practices in seeking to maintain strict objectivity and political separation imposes very tangible limits on the potential effectiveness of climate\nscientists for communicating risk in many contemporary settings. To address\nthese challenges, this paper uses insights from a collaboration between UK\nclimate scientists and artist researchers to argue for a more creative and\nemotionally attentive approach to climate science engagement and advocacy.\nIn so doing, the paper highlights innovative ways in which climate change\ncommunication can be reimagined through different art forms to enable\ncomplex concepts to become knowable. We suggest that in learning to express\ntheir work through forms of art, including print-making, theatre and\nperformance, song-writing, and creative writing, researchers experienced not\nonly a sense of liberation from the rigid communicative framework operating\nin their familiar scientific environment but also a growing self-confidence in their ability and willingness to engage in new ways of expressing their work. As such, we argue that scientific institutions and funding bodies should recognise the potential value of climate scientists engaging in advocacy through art–science collaborations and that these personal investments and contributions to science engagement by individuals should be rewarded and valued alongside conventional scientific outputs.\n","PeriodicalId":52877,"journal":{"name":"Geoscience Communication","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Climate Stories: enabling and sustaining arts interventions in climate science communication\",\"authors\":\"E. Woodley, S. Barr, P. Stott, Pierrette Thomet, Sally Flint, Fiona Lovell, Evelyn O’Malley, D. Plews, C. Rapley, C. Robbins, Rebecca Pearce, Rebecca Sandover\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/gc-5-339-2022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. The climate science community faces a major challenge with respect to communicating the\\nrisks associated with climate change within a heavily politicised landscape that is\\ncharacterised by varying degrees of denial, scepticism, distrust in\\nscientific enterprise, and an increased prevalence of misinformation (“fake\\nnews”). This issue is particularly significant given the reliance on\\nconventional “deficit” communication approaches, which are based on the\\nassumption that scientific information provision will necessarily lead to\\ndesired behavioural changes. Indeed, the constrained orthodoxy of scientific practices in seeking to maintain strict objectivity and political separation imposes very tangible limits on the potential effectiveness of climate\\nscientists for communicating risk in many contemporary settings. To address\\nthese challenges, this paper uses insights from a collaboration between UK\\nclimate scientists and artist researchers to argue for a more creative and\\nemotionally attentive approach to climate science engagement and advocacy.\\nIn so doing, the paper highlights innovative ways in which climate change\\ncommunication can be reimagined through different art forms to enable\\ncomplex concepts to become knowable. We suggest that in learning to express\\ntheir work through forms of art, including print-making, theatre and\\nperformance, song-writing, and creative writing, researchers experienced not\\nonly a sense of liberation from the rigid communicative framework operating\\nin their familiar scientific environment but also a growing self-confidence in their ability and willingness to engage in new ways of expressing their work. As such, we argue that scientific institutions and funding bodies should recognise the potential value of climate scientists engaging in advocacy through art–science collaborations and that these personal investments and contributions to science engagement by individuals should be rewarded and valued alongside conventional scientific outputs.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":52877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoscience Communication\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoscience Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-339-2022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoscience Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-339-2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Climate Stories: enabling and sustaining arts interventions in climate science communication
Abstract. The climate science community faces a major challenge with respect to communicating the
risks associated with climate change within a heavily politicised landscape that is
characterised by varying degrees of denial, scepticism, distrust in
scientific enterprise, and an increased prevalence of misinformation (“fake
news”). This issue is particularly significant given the reliance on
conventional “deficit” communication approaches, which are based on the
assumption that scientific information provision will necessarily lead to
desired behavioural changes. Indeed, the constrained orthodoxy of scientific practices in seeking to maintain strict objectivity and political separation imposes very tangible limits on the potential effectiveness of climate
scientists for communicating risk in many contemporary settings. To address
these challenges, this paper uses insights from a collaboration between UK
climate scientists and artist researchers to argue for a more creative and
emotionally attentive approach to climate science engagement and advocacy.
In so doing, the paper highlights innovative ways in which climate change
communication can be reimagined through different art forms to enable
complex concepts to become knowable. We suggest that in learning to express
their work through forms of art, including print-making, theatre and
performance, song-writing, and creative writing, researchers experienced not
only a sense of liberation from the rigid communicative framework operating
in their familiar scientific environment but also a growing self-confidence in their ability and willingness to engage in new ways of expressing their work. As such, we argue that scientific institutions and funding bodies should recognise the potential value of climate scientists engaging in advocacy through art–science collaborations and that these personal investments and contributions to science engagement by individuals should be rewarded and valued alongside conventional scientific outputs.