联邦检察官统一道德规范

IF 5.2 1区社会学 Q1 LAW

Yale Law Journal Pub Date : 2010-04-20 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.1593212

Bradley T. Tennis

{"title":"联邦检察官统一道德规范","authors":"Bradley T. Tennis","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1593212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Federal prosecutors are subject to a bewildering array of ethical regulations ranging from state ethical codes to local rules adopted by federal courts to the internal policies of the Department of Justice. The inconsistent and overlapping application of these ethical rules has led to regulatory confusion that has inhibited the development of clear ethical expectations for federal prosecutors. A uniform system of ethical regulation, dividing regulatory authority amongst the Courts, the Department of Justice, and a to-be-created independent ethical review commission should be adopted to ensure the consistent enforcement of federal criminal law.","PeriodicalId":48293,"journal":{"name":"Yale Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uniform Ethical Regulation of Federal Prosecutors\",\"authors\":\"Bradley T. Tennis\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1593212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Federal prosecutors are subject to a bewildering array of ethical regulations ranging from state ethical codes to local rules adopted by federal courts to the internal policies of the Department of Justice. The inconsistent and overlapping application of these ethical rules has led to regulatory confusion that has inhibited the development of clear ethical expectations for federal prosecutors. A uniform system of ethical regulation, dividing regulatory authority amongst the Courts, the Department of Justice, and a to-be-created independent ethical review commission should be adopted to ensure the consistent enforcement of federal criminal law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48293,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yale Law Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yale Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1593212\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yale Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1593212","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

联邦检察官要遵守一系列令人眼花缭乱的道德规范，从州道德准则到联邦法院采用的地方规则，再到司法部的内部政策。这些道德规则的不一致和重叠应用导致了监管混乱，阻碍了联邦检察官明确道德期望的发展。应该采用统一的道德监管体系，将监管权力划分为法院、司法部和即将成立的独立道德审查委员会，以确保联邦刑法的一致执行。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Uniform Ethical Regulation of Federal Prosecutors

Federal prosecutors are subject to a bewildering array of ethical regulations ranging from state ethical codes to local rules adopted by federal courts to the internal policies of the Department of Justice. The inconsistent and overlapping application of these ethical rules has led to regulatory confusion that has inhibited the development of clear ethical expectations for federal prosecutors. A uniform system of ethical regulation, dividing regulatory authority amongst the Courts, the Department of Justice, and a to-be-created independent ethical review commission should be adopted to ensure the consistent enforcement of federal criminal law.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Yale Law Journal LAW-

CiteScore

4.50

自引率

6.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Yale Law Journal Online is the online companion to The Yale Law Journal. It replaces The Pocket Part, which was the first such companion to be published by a leading law review. YLJ Online will continue The Pocket Part"s mission of augmenting the scholarship printed in The Yale Law Journal by providing original Essays, legal commentaries, responses to articles printed in the Journal, podcast and iTunes University recordings of various pieces, and other works by both established and emerging academics and practitioners.