保罗·利科尔阐释视角下的《古兰经教育解释》文献分析及其作为伊斯兰教育来源的关联

Suhuf Pub Date : 2022-10-11 DOI:10.22548/shf.v15i1.705
Rosidin Rosidin, Fenty Andriani
{"title":"保罗·利科尔阐释视角下的《古兰经教育解释》文献分析及其作为伊斯兰教育来源的关联","authors":"Rosidin Rosidin, Fenty Andriani","doi":"10.22548/shf.v15i1.705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzes nine tafsīr tarbawiy (Quranic educational interpretation) literatures in Indonesia from Ricoeur’s hermeneutics perspective. There are two main research findings. First, as objective pole, tafsīr tarbawiy terminology meaning structure as Qur’anic educational interpretation written by Islamic experts for pragmatic and idealistic purposes. As subjective pole, tafsīr tarbawiy literature discussing Islamic education by quoting educational verses through the thematic interpretation (mauḍūʻī) method using various references, according to the author’s subjectivity. There are strengths and limitations of tafsīr tarbawiy literature. The strength is it opens the way for construction of tafsīr tarbawiy literature which is solutive and realistic. The limitation is its interpretation is ideological and utopian. Second, tafsīr tarbawiy literature is relevant as a source of Islamic education theory and practice since it is prepared for pragmatic purposes as a reference for tafsīr tarbawiy course, written by the Islamic education theorists and practitioners, and contains a thick discussion on issues of Islamic education, though the quality and validity are graded, based on the competence level which is the author’s appropriation.","PeriodicalId":32680,"journal":{"name":"Suhuf","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Literature Analysis of Tafsīr Tarbawiy (Qur’anic Educational Interpretation) from Paul Ricoeur’s Hermeneutic Perspective and Its Relevance as A Source of Islamic Education\",\"authors\":\"Rosidin Rosidin, Fenty Andriani\",\"doi\":\"10.22548/shf.v15i1.705\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper analyzes nine tafsīr tarbawiy (Quranic educational interpretation) literatures in Indonesia from Ricoeur’s hermeneutics perspective. There are two main research findings. First, as objective pole, tafsīr tarbawiy terminology meaning structure as Qur’anic educational interpretation written by Islamic experts for pragmatic and idealistic purposes. As subjective pole, tafsīr tarbawiy literature discussing Islamic education by quoting educational verses through the thematic interpretation (mauḍūʻī) method using various references, according to the author’s subjectivity. There are strengths and limitations of tafsīr tarbawiy literature. The strength is it opens the way for construction of tafsīr tarbawiy literature which is solutive and realistic. The limitation is its interpretation is ideological and utopian. Second, tafsīr tarbawiy literature is relevant as a source of Islamic education theory and practice since it is prepared for pragmatic purposes as a reference for tafsīr tarbawiy course, written by the Islamic education theorists and practitioners, and contains a thick discussion on issues of Islamic education, though the quality and validity are graded, based on the competence level which is the author’s appropriation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Suhuf\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Suhuf\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22548/shf.v15i1.705\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suhuf","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22548/shf.v15i1.705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从利科尔的解释学视角分析了印尼的九篇《古兰经》教育解释文献。主要有两项研究发现。首先,作为客观极点,塔夫斯基·塔伯维术语的意义结构是伊斯兰教专家出于实用主义和理想主义目的而编写的古兰经教育解释。作为主体性极点的塔夫斯基·塔尔巴维文学,根据作者的主体性,通过主题解释(mauḍū ā ā ā)的方法,运用各种参照物,引用教育经文来讨论伊斯兰教育。塔夫斯基文学既有优势也有局限。其优点是为建构具有解决性和现实性的当代文学开辟了道路。其局限性在于它的解释是意识形态的和乌托邦的。其次,塔布尔文献作为伊斯兰教育理论和实践的来源是相关的,因为它是为实用目的而准备的,作为塔布尔·塔布尔课程的参考,由伊斯兰教育理论家和实践者撰写,并包含了对伊斯兰教育问题的大量讨论,尽管质量和有效性是根据作者的能力水平进行分级的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Literature Analysis of Tafsīr Tarbawiy (Qur’anic Educational Interpretation) from Paul Ricoeur’s Hermeneutic Perspective and Its Relevance as A Source of Islamic Education
This paper analyzes nine tafsīr tarbawiy (Quranic educational interpretation) literatures in Indonesia from Ricoeur’s hermeneutics perspective. There are two main research findings. First, as objective pole, tafsīr tarbawiy terminology meaning structure as Qur’anic educational interpretation written by Islamic experts for pragmatic and idealistic purposes. As subjective pole, tafsīr tarbawiy literature discussing Islamic education by quoting educational verses through the thematic interpretation (mauḍūʻī) method using various references, according to the author’s subjectivity. There are strengths and limitations of tafsīr tarbawiy literature. The strength is it opens the way for construction of tafsīr tarbawiy literature which is solutive and realistic. The limitation is its interpretation is ideological and utopian. Second, tafsīr tarbawiy literature is relevant as a source of Islamic education theory and practice since it is prepared for pragmatic purposes as a reference for tafsīr tarbawiy course, written by the Islamic education theorists and practitioners, and contains a thick discussion on issues of Islamic education, though the quality and validity are graded, based on the competence level which is the author’s appropriation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信