Cornellius Hendra Purnama Aria Sumantrie, B. Semedi, B. Purwanto
{"title":"水压计法测定远、中、近端管腔中心静脉压力的比较","authors":"Cornellius Hendra Purnama Aria Sumantrie, B. Semedi, B. Purwanto","doi":"10.30651/JQM.V5I2.5356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Catheter Vein Pressure in ward-cared patients is rarely measured and considered invalid. The two catheter vein pressure postulates contradict, making confusion among health workers. Dr Russo said the distal-medial-proximal Catheter Vein Pressure has no difference but were denied by Susan S. Scott. Proof of postulate is needed as a solution to inward care. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the central vein pressure between distal, medial, and proximal lumens with the water manometer method. Forty-nine samples retrospective study were taken from the distal - medial - proximal Catheter Vein Pressure of the \"zero\" until fifth days. The differences are analyzed with Statistical Paired t Test with p-Value < 0.05 from SPSS ver. 26 to prove the right postulate. 49 samples were concluded to represent of population. Catheter Vein Pressure from day \"zero\" becomes zero difference, the fifth day 91.8% are no difference while the rest have difference of 0.2 - 1.0 cm H2O and the conclusion are no significant difference with 95% CI. The correlation scale of 0.998 and 0.999 proves that the three lumens tend to produce no differences. In conclusion, the distal - medial - proximal Catheter Vein Pressure values in this study have no significant differences and consistent from \"zero\" until fifth days. This is formulated as P distal = P medial = P proximal (cm H2O). Keywords : Central Vein Pressure, Pressure, distal - medial - proximal, no differences, ward patient. Correspondence : sumantrie_medicalgp@yahoo.com","PeriodicalId":31682,"journal":{"name":"Qanun Medika Jurnal Kedokteran Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of central vein pressure between distal, medial, and proximal lumens with water manometer method\",\"authors\":\"Cornellius Hendra Purnama Aria Sumantrie, B. Semedi, B. Purwanto\",\"doi\":\"10.30651/JQM.V5I2.5356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Catheter Vein Pressure in ward-cared patients is rarely measured and considered invalid. The two catheter vein pressure postulates contradict, making confusion among health workers. Dr Russo said the distal-medial-proximal Catheter Vein Pressure has no difference but were denied by Susan S. Scott. Proof of postulate is needed as a solution to inward care. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the central vein pressure between distal, medial, and proximal lumens with the water manometer method. Forty-nine samples retrospective study were taken from the distal - medial - proximal Catheter Vein Pressure of the \\\"zero\\\" until fifth days. The differences are analyzed with Statistical Paired t Test with p-Value < 0.05 from SPSS ver. 26 to prove the right postulate. 49 samples were concluded to represent of population. Catheter Vein Pressure from day \\\"zero\\\" becomes zero difference, the fifth day 91.8% are no difference while the rest have difference of 0.2 - 1.0 cm H2O and the conclusion are no significant difference with 95% CI. The correlation scale of 0.998 and 0.999 proves that the three lumens tend to produce no differences. In conclusion, the distal - medial - proximal Catheter Vein Pressure values in this study have no significant differences and consistent from \\\"zero\\\" until fifth days. This is formulated as P distal = P medial = P proximal (cm H2O). Keywords : Central Vein Pressure, Pressure, distal - medial - proximal, no differences, ward patient. Correspondence : sumantrie_medicalgp@yahoo.com\",\"PeriodicalId\":31682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Qanun Medika Jurnal Kedokteran Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Qanun Medika Jurnal Kedokteran Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30651/JQM.V5I2.5356\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qanun Medika Jurnal Kedokteran Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30651/JQM.V5I2.5356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在病房监护的患者中,很少测量导管静脉压力,并认为其无效。两种导管静脉压力假设相互矛盾,使卫生工作者感到困惑。Russo医生说远端-中端-近端导管静脉压力没有区别,但被Susan S. Scott否认。为了解决内心的忧虑,需要假设的证明。因此,本研究旨在用水压计法比较远端、中端和近端管腔之间的中心静脉压力。回顾性研究49个样本从远端-中端-近端取导管静脉压为“零”直至第五天。采用SPSS统计软件的配对t检验,p值< 0.05。证明正确的假设。49个样本代表总体。导管静脉压从“0”天开始变为零差,第5天91.8%无差异,其余相差0.2 ~ 1.0 cm H2O,结论差异无统计学意义,95% CI。0.998和0.999的相关尺度证明三个流明趋向于不产生差异。综上所述,本研究中远端、内端和近端导管静脉压力值无显著差异,从“零”一直持续到第5天。公式为P远端= P内侧= P近端(cm H2O)。关键词:中心静脉压力,压力,远端-中端-近端,无差异,病房病人。通信:sumantrie_medicalgp@yahoo.com
Comparison of central vein pressure between distal, medial, and proximal lumens with water manometer method
ABSTRACT Catheter Vein Pressure in ward-cared patients is rarely measured and considered invalid. The two catheter vein pressure postulates contradict, making confusion among health workers. Dr Russo said the distal-medial-proximal Catheter Vein Pressure has no difference but were denied by Susan S. Scott. Proof of postulate is needed as a solution to inward care. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the central vein pressure between distal, medial, and proximal lumens with the water manometer method. Forty-nine samples retrospective study were taken from the distal - medial - proximal Catheter Vein Pressure of the "zero" until fifth days. The differences are analyzed with Statistical Paired t Test with p-Value < 0.05 from SPSS ver. 26 to prove the right postulate. 49 samples were concluded to represent of population. Catheter Vein Pressure from day "zero" becomes zero difference, the fifth day 91.8% are no difference while the rest have difference of 0.2 - 1.0 cm H2O and the conclusion are no significant difference with 95% CI. The correlation scale of 0.998 and 0.999 proves that the three lumens tend to produce no differences. In conclusion, the distal - medial - proximal Catheter Vein Pressure values in this study have no significant differences and consistent from "zero" until fifth days. This is formulated as P distal = P medial = P proximal (cm H2O). Keywords : Central Vein Pressure, Pressure, distal - medial - proximal, no differences, ward patient. Correspondence : sumantrie_medicalgp@yahoo.com