{"title":"ἔγραψέ μοι γάρ ... τὰ νῦν οὖν γράφω σοι. οὖν and γάρ as inferential and elaborative discourse markers in Greek papyrus letters (I – IV AD)","authors":"Klaas Bentein","doi":"10.3406/RBPH.2016.8875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I analyse the use of the particles οὖν and γάρ in a corpus of documentary texts ranging from the first to the fourth century AD. I attempt to answer three main research questions: (i) with what frequency are οὖν and γάρ used; was one of these particles used more frequently than the other?; (ii) what are the functional/syntactic similarities and differences between the two particles; (iii) are there signs of functional development? My observations are framed within ‘discourse marker theory’, whereby οὖν and γάρ are viewed as ‘inferential’ and ‘elaborative’ discourse markers.","PeriodicalId":44528,"journal":{"name":"REVUE BELGE DE PHILOLOGIE ET D HISTOIRE","volume":"32 1","pages":"67-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVUE BELGE DE PHILOLOGIE ET D HISTOIRE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3406/RBPH.2016.8875","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我分析了从公元一世纪到公元四世纪的文献文本语料库中ο ο ν和γ α ρ的用法。我试图回答三个主要的研究问题:(I) ο ν和γ α ρ的使用频率是多少;其中一个粒子比另一个使用得更频繁吗?(ii)这两个词在功能/句法上有什么异同;(iii)是否有功能发展的迹象?我的观察是在“话语标记理论”框架内进行的,即ο ο ν和γ α ρ被视为“推理的”和“阐述的”话语标记。
ἔγραψέ μοι γάρ ... τὰ νῦν οὖν γράφω σοι. οὖν and γάρ as inferential and elaborative discourse markers in Greek papyrus letters (I – IV AD)
I analyse the use of the particles οὖν and γάρ in a corpus of documentary texts ranging from the first to the fourth century AD. I attempt to answer three main research questions: (i) with what frequency are οὖν and γάρ used; was one of these particles used more frequently than the other?; (ii) what are the functional/syntactic similarities and differences between the two particles; (iii) are there signs of functional development? My observations are framed within ‘discourse marker theory’, whereby οὖν and γάρ are viewed as ‘inferential’ and ‘elaborative’ discourse markers.