{"title":"论人的本质与身体的复活","authors":"S. Goetz","doi":"10.12978/JAT.2018-6.181919061425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I respond to Joshua Mugg and James T. Turner, Jr's claim that the doctrine of the resurrection requires the numerical sameness of ante- and post-mortem bodies. I argue that they have not shown that Scripture teaches this view and, therefore, that animalism, as opposed to substance dualism, does not offer a superior explanation for the necessity of the resurrection .","PeriodicalId":14947,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Analytic Theology","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Nature of Human Persons and the Resurrection of the Body\",\"authors\":\"S. Goetz\",\"doi\":\"10.12978/JAT.2018-6.181919061425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, I respond to Joshua Mugg and James T. Turner, Jr's claim that the doctrine of the resurrection requires the numerical sameness of ante- and post-mortem bodies. I argue that they have not shown that Scripture teaches this view and, therefore, that animalism, as opposed to substance dualism, does not offer a superior explanation for the necessity of the resurrection .\",\"PeriodicalId\":14947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Analytic Theology\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Analytic Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12978/JAT.2018-6.181919061425\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Analytic Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12978/JAT.2018-6.181919061425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在这篇论文中，我回应了Joshua Mugg和James T. Turner, Jr的说法，即复活的教义要求死前和死后身体的数量相同。我认为他们没有证明圣经教导了这种观点，因此，与物质二元论相反的动物论，并没有为复活的必要性提供一个更好的解释。
On the Nature of Human Persons and the Resurrection of the Body
In this paper, I respond to Joshua Mugg and James T. Turner, Jr's claim that the doctrine of the resurrection requires the numerical sameness of ante- and post-mortem bodies. I argue that they have not shown that Scripture teaches this view and, therefore, that animalism, as opposed to substance dualism, does not offer a superior explanation for the necessity of the resurrection .
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
