将水平井眼尺寸从8.5减小到6.75,非常规井建设成本降低25%

Eric David Schumacker, Philip Vogelsberg
{"title":"将水平井眼尺寸从8.5减小到6.75,非常规井建设成本降低25%","authors":"Eric David Schumacker, Philip Vogelsberg","doi":"10.2118/192953-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Slim hole well design can reduce well construction cost through a reduction in steel, fluids, and disposal costs. In the industry, there has been a misconception that slim hole size possesses the tradeoff of slower ROP and less efficient fracture treatment. Improvements in downhole tools, drill strings, rig capability, and drilling fluid design have been implemented to improve ROP in slim holes. Completions designs were refined for slimmer holes to avoid any significant loss in stimulation effectiveness and maintain well value. Through systematic replication of learnings and designs across basins, slim hole well design has advanced. Slim hole well design (transition from 8.5\" / 7.875\" hole and 5.5\" production casing to 6.75\" hole and 5.5\" / 4.5\" production casing) can reduce Unconventional well cost by over 25% which reduces well unit development cost (UDC).","PeriodicalId":11208,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, November 13, 2018","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reducing Horizontal Hole Size from 8.5 to 6.75 Reduces Unconventional Well Construction Cost by 25%\",\"authors\":\"Eric David Schumacker, Philip Vogelsberg\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/192953-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Slim hole well design can reduce well construction cost through a reduction in steel, fluids, and disposal costs. In the industry, there has been a misconception that slim hole size possesses the tradeoff of slower ROP and less efficient fracture treatment. Improvements in downhole tools, drill strings, rig capability, and drilling fluid design have been implemented to improve ROP in slim holes. Completions designs were refined for slimmer holes to avoid any significant loss in stimulation effectiveness and maintain well value. Through systematic replication of learnings and designs across basins, slim hole well design has advanced. Slim hole well design (transition from 8.5\\\" / 7.875\\\" hole and 5.5\\\" production casing to 6.75\\\" hole and 5.5\\\" / 4.5\\\" production casing) can reduce Unconventional well cost by over 25% which reduces well unit development cost (UDC).\",\"PeriodicalId\":11208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Tue, November 13, 2018\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Tue, November 13, 2018\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/192953-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, November 13, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/192953-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

小井眼设计可以通过减少钢材、流体和处理成本来降低建井成本。业内一直存在一种误解,认为小井眼尺寸会降低机械钻速和压裂效率。为了提高小井眼的ROP,井下工具、钻柱、钻机性能和钻井液设计都得到了改进。为了避免增产效果的显著损失,并保持井的价值,我们对小井眼的完井设计进行了改进。通过系统地复制各盆地的经验和设计,小井眼井设计取得了进步。小井眼设计(从8.5”/ 7.875”井眼和5.5”生产套管过渡到6.75”井眼和5.5”/ 4.5”生产套管)可以降低非常规井成本25%以上,降低单井开发成本(UDC)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reducing Horizontal Hole Size from 8.5 to 6.75 Reduces Unconventional Well Construction Cost by 25%
Slim hole well design can reduce well construction cost through a reduction in steel, fluids, and disposal costs. In the industry, there has been a misconception that slim hole size possesses the tradeoff of slower ROP and less efficient fracture treatment. Improvements in downhole tools, drill strings, rig capability, and drilling fluid design have been implemented to improve ROP in slim holes. Completions designs were refined for slimmer holes to avoid any significant loss in stimulation effectiveness and maintain well value. Through systematic replication of learnings and designs across basins, slim hole well design has advanced. Slim hole well design (transition from 8.5" / 7.875" hole and 5.5" production casing to 6.75" hole and 5.5" / 4.5" production casing) can reduce Unconventional well cost by over 25% which reduces well unit development cost (UDC).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信