"致命性":是否可以作为一个独立的医学和法律范畴引入科学界。死亡率(医学和法律研究)

V. M. Redkous
{"title":"\"致命性\":是否可以作为一个独立的医学和法律范畴引入科学界。死亡率(医学和法律研究)","authors":"V. M. Redkous","doi":"10.31857/s102694520026806-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The review not only draws attention to the results of the first monographic medical and legal study of the patterns of lethality development, but also evaluates them from the standpoint of the development of jurisprudence in the Russian Federation. The monograph makes a not unsuccessful attempt to correlate several terms: “lethality”, “vitality”, “mortality”, “mortality”. At the same time, a fundamentally important provision is substantiated: the inadmissibility of identifying the terms “lethality” and “mortality”. This made it possible to avoid the traditional approach in covering mortality. In addition, the use of the term “vitality” presupposes the presence of thanatological education of people in educational institutions in the universities of the country, to which clearly insufficient attention is paid","PeriodicalId":82769,"journal":{"name":"Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Lethality”: is it permissible to introduce into scientific circulation as an independent medical and legal category V.N. Galuzo. Lethality (medical and legal research)\",\"authors\":\"V. M. Redkous\",\"doi\":\"10.31857/s102694520026806-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The review not only draws attention to the results of the first monographic medical and legal study of the patterns of lethality development, but also evaluates them from the standpoint of the development of jurisprudence in the Russian Federation. The monograph makes a not unsuccessful attempt to correlate several terms: “lethality”, “vitality”, “mortality”, “mortality”. At the same time, a fundamentally important provision is substantiated: the inadmissibility of identifying the terms “lethality” and “mortality”. This made it possible to avoid the traditional approach in covering mortality. In addition, the use of the term “vitality” presupposes the presence of thanatological education of people in educational institutions in the universities of the country, to which clearly insufficient attention is paid\",\"PeriodicalId\":82769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31857/s102694520026806-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31857/s102694520026806-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

审查报告不仅提请注意对致命性发展模式进行的第一次医学和法律专题研究的结果,而且还从俄罗斯联邦法学发展的角度对这些结果进行了评价。该专著试图将几个术语联系起来:“致命性”,“活力”,“死亡率”,“死亡率”。与此同时,一项根本重要的规定得到了证实:不能承认“致命性”和“死亡率”这两个词。这样就可以避免采用传统的方法来报道死亡率。此外,使用“活力”一词的先决条件是在该国大学的教育机构中对人们进行死亡教育,而这显然没有得到足够的重视
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Lethality”: is it permissible to introduce into scientific circulation as an independent medical and legal category V.N. Galuzo. Lethality (medical and legal research)
The review not only draws attention to the results of the first monographic medical and legal study of the patterns of lethality development, but also evaluates them from the standpoint of the development of jurisprudence in the Russian Federation. The monograph makes a not unsuccessful attempt to correlate several terms: “lethality”, “vitality”, “mortality”, “mortality”. At the same time, a fundamentally important provision is substantiated: the inadmissibility of identifying the terms “lethality” and “mortality”. This made it possible to avoid the traditional approach in covering mortality. In addition, the use of the term “vitality” presupposes the presence of thanatological education of people in educational institutions in the universities of the country, to which clearly insufficient attention is paid
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信