多语、多语能力与语言系统互动(局限

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Teanga Pub Date : 2018-11-15 DOI:10.35903/TEANGA.V25I0.46
D. Singleton
{"title":"多语、多语能力与语言系统互动(局限","authors":"D. Singleton","doi":"10.35903/TEANGA.V25I0.46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article addresses the proposition that all talk whatsoever of bounds between language-varieties in the mind should be abandoned. This abandonment of boundaries is a standard view in respect of the semantic or conceptual dimensions of language. The tendency does not, however, stop there; being called into question is the whole notion that languages in the mind are bounded entities in any of their aspects. The response offered here to such a position is that language knowledge in the mind is all its aspects, in fact, highly differentiated, and that this differentiation broadly follows the lines recognized by the traditional conception which draws (always, of course, permeable) lines between languages. Evidence is adduced in favour of this latter view from a number of areas, including language loss and recovery, bilingual/multilingual development and communication and the affective dimension of language differentiation.","PeriodicalId":36036,"journal":{"name":"Teanga","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multilingualism, Multi-competence and (Limits to) the Interaction Between Language Systems\",\"authors\":\"D. Singleton\",\"doi\":\"10.35903/TEANGA.V25I0.46\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article addresses the proposition that all talk whatsoever of bounds between language-varieties in the mind should be abandoned. This abandonment of boundaries is a standard view in respect of the semantic or conceptual dimensions of language. The tendency does not, however, stop there; being called into question is the whole notion that languages in the mind are bounded entities in any of their aspects. The response offered here to such a position is that language knowledge in the mind is all its aspects, in fact, highly differentiated, and that this differentiation broadly follows the lines recognized by the traditional conception which draws (always, of course, permeable) lines between languages. Evidence is adduced in favour of this latter view from a number of areas, including language loss and recovery, bilingual/multilingual development and communication and the affective dimension of language differentiation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teanga\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teanga\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35903/TEANGA.V25I0.46\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teanga","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35903/TEANGA.V25I0.46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

这篇文章讨论了一个命题,即所有关于语言变体之间的界限的讨论都应该在头脑中被抛弃。放弃边界是语言的语义或概念维度的标准观点。然而,这种趋势并没有就此停止;人们质疑的是,思维中的语言在任何方面都是有界限的实体。对于这种观点,这里给出的回应是,大脑中的语言知识实际上是高度分化的,这种分化大体上遵循传统观念所认可的界限,即在语言之间划清界限(当然,总是可渗透的)。支持后一种观点的证据来自许多领域,包括语言丧失和恢复、双语/多语发展和交流以及语言分化的情感层面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multilingualism, Multi-competence and (Limits to) the Interaction Between Language Systems
This article addresses the proposition that all talk whatsoever of bounds between language-varieties in the mind should be abandoned. This abandonment of boundaries is a standard view in respect of the semantic or conceptual dimensions of language. The tendency does not, however, stop there; being called into question is the whole notion that languages in the mind are bounded entities in any of their aspects. The response offered here to such a position is that language knowledge in the mind is all its aspects, in fact, highly differentiated, and that this differentiation broadly follows the lines recognized by the traditional conception which draws (always, of course, permeable) lines between languages. Evidence is adduced in favour of this latter view from a number of areas, including language loss and recovery, bilingual/multilingual development and communication and the affective dimension of language differentiation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Teanga
Teanga Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信