民间社会部门的适应性项目管理:迈向学术研究议程

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Lena Gutheil
{"title":"民间社会部门的适应性项目管理:迈向学术研究议程","authors":"Lena Gutheil","doi":"10.3828/IDPR.2020.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to react adequately to the complex, fast-changing and politicised environments in which development projects operate, donors have started adopting more adaptive project management approaches. Projects dealing with civil society actors in particular are said to benefit from adaptive management. As adaptive management largely depends on locally led and politically smart programming, it is presented as one avenue for addressing long-standing problems of civil society organisations, such as donor dependency, lack of legitimacy and accountability issues. However, the evidence base concerning the effects of adaptive management is scarce and rather anecdotal and an overarching definition of adaptive management has not been established. In order to work towards an academic research agenda for adaptive management, the article systematically reviews twenty-one case studies to generate insights into what donors and implementers consider as adaptive practices, their perceived effects, obstacles and derived recommendations. The article thus contributes to identifying which actors are driving the adaptive agenda, which practices are considered as adaptive, what we can learn from first pilot interventions and which research gaps can be derived from this analysis.","PeriodicalId":46625,"journal":{"name":"International Development Planning Review","volume":"55 1","pages":"1-26"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adaptive project management for the civil society sector: towards an academic research agenda\",\"authors\":\"Lena Gutheil\",\"doi\":\"10.3828/IDPR.2020.17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to react adequately to the complex, fast-changing and politicised environments in which development projects operate, donors have started adopting more adaptive project management approaches. Projects dealing with civil society actors in particular are said to benefit from adaptive management. As adaptive management largely depends on locally led and politically smart programming, it is presented as one avenue for addressing long-standing problems of civil society organisations, such as donor dependency, lack of legitimacy and accountability issues. However, the evidence base concerning the effects of adaptive management is scarce and rather anecdotal and an overarching definition of adaptive management has not been established. In order to work towards an academic research agenda for adaptive management, the article systematically reviews twenty-one case studies to generate insights into what donors and implementers consider as adaptive practices, their perceived effects, obstacles and derived recommendations. The article thus contributes to identifying which actors are driving the adaptive agenda, which practices are considered as adaptive, what we can learn from first pilot interventions and which research gaps can be derived from this analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Development Planning Review\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"1-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Development Planning Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3828/IDPR.2020.17\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Development Planning Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/IDPR.2020.17","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了对发展项目所处的复杂、迅速变化和政治化的环境作出充分反应,捐助者已开始采用更有适应性的项目管理办法。据说,涉及民间社会行动者的项目尤其受益于适应性管理。由于适应性管理在很大程度上取决于地方领导和政治上明智的规划,因此它被视为解决民间社会组织长期存在的问题的一种途径,例如对捐助者的依赖、缺乏合法性和问责问题。然而,关于适应性管理的影响的证据基础是稀缺的,而且相当轶事,适应性管理的总体定义尚未建立。为了实现适应性管理的学术研究议程,本文系统地回顾了21个案例研究,以深入了解捐助者和实施者认为的适应性实践、它们的感知效果、障碍和衍生的建议。因此,本文有助于确定哪些参与者正在推动适应性议程,哪些实践被认为是适应性的,我们可以从第一次试点干预中学到什么,以及哪些研究空白可以从这一分析中得出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adaptive project management for the civil society sector: towards an academic research agenda
In order to react adequately to the complex, fast-changing and politicised environments in which development projects operate, donors have started adopting more adaptive project management approaches. Projects dealing with civil society actors in particular are said to benefit from adaptive management. As adaptive management largely depends on locally led and politically smart programming, it is presented as one avenue for addressing long-standing problems of civil society organisations, such as donor dependency, lack of legitimacy and accountability issues. However, the evidence base concerning the effects of adaptive management is scarce and rather anecdotal and an overarching definition of adaptive management has not been established. In order to work towards an academic research agenda for adaptive management, the article systematically reviews twenty-one case studies to generate insights into what donors and implementers consider as adaptive practices, their perceived effects, obstacles and derived recommendations. The article thus contributes to identifying which actors are driving the adaptive agenda, which practices are considered as adaptive, what we can learn from first pilot interventions and which research gaps can be derived from this analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: International Development Planning Review’s editorial policy is to reflect international development planning policy and practice. This includes a focus on the physical, economic and social conditions of urban and rural populations. The journal explores current national and international policy agendas, achievements and strategies in this area, offering material of interest to its established academic and professional readership as well as to a broader critical audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信