指导方针导向的方法脂质(目标)降低质量改进国际计划

A. Langer, M. Tan, C. Spindler, O. Berwanger, Diane Camara, Khalid Al Faraidy, M. Akbar, W. Almahmeed, M. Alcocer-Gamba
{"title":"指导方针导向的方法脂质(目标)降低质量改进国际计划","authors":"A. Langer, M. Tan, C. Spindler, O. Berwanger, Diane Camara, Khalid Al Faraidy, M. Akbar, W. Almahmeed, M. Alcocer-Gamba","doi":"10.33696/cardiology.4.041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Despite practice guidelines, strategies for lowering LDL-C are often poorly adopted in clinical practice. \nMaterials and Methods: Five countries (Brazil, Kuwait, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, and UAE) enrolled 2,422 patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) with low density lipoprotein cholesterol level (LDL-C) above 1.4 mmol/L. Patients were followed at 6 ± 2 months intervals to assess LDL-C level and treatment with ezetimibe and/or proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor (PCSK9i).\nResults: 2422 patients 60.4 ± 11.7 years old and 29% women were enrolled from 87 participating cardiology sites. Overall, 91.1% of patients had coronary artery disease and FH in 12.3%. At baseline LDL-C was 2.96 ± 1.36 mmol/L and 1.87 ± 1.28 mmol/L (p<0.0001) at last available observation (n=2014). Proportion of patients achieving LDL<1.4 mmol/L (primary endpoint) increased from zero to 41.4% (p<0.0001). \nAt baseline, 99.2% of patients were on statin (81.3% high intensity statin), 34.4% on ezetimibe and its use increased significantly (62.9%, p<0.0001). PCSK9i use increased to 35.0% from baseline to last follow up (p<0.0001). Clinical outcomes such as ACS, CVA/TIA, PCI, CABG, or hospitalization for ASCVD reasons were recorded in 10.7% of patients during the follow up. Patients with no event had an overall LDL-C of 1.90 ± 1.3 mmol/L while those with an event had LDL-C significantly higher at the visit immediately prior to event (2.70 ± 1.35, p=0.0001).\nConclusion: The results indicate the feasibility of overcoming treatment inertia and improving LDL-C control which should help to achieve reduction in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in ASCVD patients.","PeriodicalId":15510,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Cardiology","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guidelines Oriented Approach to Lipid (GOAL) Lowering Quality Improvement International Program\",\"authors\":\"A. Langer, M. Tan, C. Spindler, O. Berwanger, Diane Camara, Khalid Al Faraidy, M. Akbar, W. Almahmeed, M. Alcocer-Gamba\",\"doi\":\"10.33696/cardiology.4.041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Despite practice guidelines, strategies for lowering LDL-C are often poorly adopted in clinical practice. \\nMaterials and Methods: Five countries (Brazil, Kuwait, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, and UAE) enrolled 2,422 patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) with low density lipoprotein cholesterol level (LDL-C) above 1.4 mmol/L. Patients were followed at 6 ± 2 months intervals to assess LDL-C level and treatment with ezetimibe and/or proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor (PCSK9i).\\nResults: 2422 patients 60.4 ± 11.7 years old and 29% women were enrolled from 87 participating cardiology sites. Overall, 91.1% of patients had coronary artery disease and FH in 12.3%. At baseline LDL-C was 2.96 ± 1.36 mmol/L and 1.87 ± 1.28 mmol/L (p<0.0001) at last available observation (n=2014). Proportion of patients achieving LDL<1.4 mmol/L (primary endpoint) increased from zero to 41.4% (p<0.0001). \\nAt baseline, 99.2% of patients were on statin (81.3% high intensity statin), 34.4% on ezetimibe and its use increased significantly (62.9%, p<0.0001). PCSK9i use increased to 35.0% from baseline to last follow up (p<0.0001). Clinical outcomes such as ACS, CVA/TIA, PCI, CABG, or hospitalization for ASCVD reasons were recorded in 10.7% of patients during the follow up. Patients with no event had an overall LDL-C of 1.90 ± 1.3 mmol/L while those with an event had LDL-C significantly higher at the visit immediately prior to event (2.70 ± 1.35, p=0.0001).\\nConclusion: The results indicate the feasibility of overcoming treatment inertia and improving LDL-C control which should help to achieve reduction in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in ASCVD patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33696/cardiology.4.041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33696/cardiology.4.041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管有实践指南,降低LDL-C的策略在临床实践中往往很少被采用。材料与方法:5个国家(巴西、科威特、墨西哥、沙特阿拉伯和阿联酋)纳入2422例低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平(LDL-C)高于1.4 mmol/L的动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)或家族性高胆固醇血症(FH)患者。每隔6±2个月对患者进行随访,评估LDL-C水平和依折麦比和/或蛋白转化酶枯草菌素/ keexin 9型抑制剂(PCSK9i)的治疗情况。结果:来自87个心脏病中心的2422例患者(60.4±11.7岁),其中29%为女性。总体而言,91.1%的患者有冠状动脉疾病,12.3%的患者有FH。基线LDL-C分别为2.96±1.36 mmol/L和1.87±1.28 mmol/L (p<0.0001) (n=2014)。LDL<1.4 mmol/L(主要终点)的患者比例从0增加到41.4% (p<0.0001)。在基线时,99.2%的患者使用他汀类药物(81.3%为高强度他汀类药物),34.4%的患者使用依zetimibe,其使用显著增加(62.9%,p<0.0001)。从基线到最后一次随访,PCSK9i的使用率增加到35.0% (p<0.0001)。在随访期间,10.7%的患者记录了ACS、CVA/TIA、PCI、CABG或因ASCVD原因住院等临床结果。无事件的患者总体LDL-C为1.90±1.3 mmol/L,而有事件的患者在事件发生前就诊时LDL-C显著升高(2.70±1.35,p=0.0001)。结论:克服治疗惰性,提高LDL-C控制水平是可行的,有助于降低ASCVD患者心血管疾病的发病率和死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Guidelines Oriented Approach to Lipid (GOAL) Lowering Quality Improvement International Program
Background: Despite practice guidelines, strategies for lowering LDL-C are often poorly adopted in clinical practice. Materials and Methods: Five countries (Brazil, Kuwait, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, and UAE) enrolled 2,422 patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) with low density lipoprotein cholesterol level (LDL-C) above 1.4 mmol/L. Patients were followed at 6 ± 2 months intervals to assess LDL-C level and treatment with ezetimibe and/or proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor (PCSK9i). Results: 2422 patients 60.4 ± 11.7 years old and 29% women were enrolled from 87 participating cardiology sites. Overall, 91.1% of patients had coronary artery disease and FH in 12.3%. At baseline LDL-C was 2.96 ± 1.36 mmol/L and 1.87 ± 1.28 mmol/L (p<0.0001) at last available observation (n=2014). Proportion of patients achieving LDL<1.4 mmol/L (primary endpoint) increased from zero to 41.4% (p<0.0001). At baseline, 99.2% of patients were on statin (81.3% high intensity statin), 34.4% on ezetimibe and its use increased significantly (62.9%, p<0.0001). PCSK9i use increased to 35.0% from baseline to last follow up (p<0.0001). Clinical outcomes such as ACS, CVA/TIA, PCI, CABG, or hospitalization for ASCVD reasons were recorded in 10.7% of patients during the follow up. Patients with no event had an overall LDL-C of 1.90 ± 1.3 mmol/L while those with an event had LDL-C significantly higher at the visit immediately prior to event (2.70 ± 1.35, p=0.0001). Conclusion: The results indicate the feasibility of overcoming treatment inertia and improving LDL-C control which should help to achieve reduction in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in ASCVD patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信