数字遗产的在线传播:动机、路径与效果

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Huaxiang He, Daopin Cheng, M. Mo
{"title":"数字遗产的在线传播:动机、路径与效果","authors":"Huaxiang He, Daopin Cheng, M. Mo","doi":"10.1109/DigitalHeritage.2013.6744797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the 21st century, the ecology of communication of cultural heritage has changed significantly thanks in large part to new media technology. For the existing social order and cultural ecology, new media technology has both advantages and disadvantages. The advantages are apparent, but the disadvantages are hidden and less discussed by scientists exclude a few humanists. Here are some of the facts: (1) the more complex and vivid the media symbol environment is, the more beguiling the resulting stereotypes are, and the greater the likelihood is that people will mix up the real world with the cyberworld; (2) compared with traditional media such as radio and television, ethics anomie in network communication is more serious, especially the copyright infringement, defaming and invasion of privacy. (3) network changed people's space-time concept, formed specific bias of communication which makes certain types of information can more easily spread and be accepted than other information; (4) under the action of multi factors including above three elements, the mechanism of cultural inheritance and variation is destroyed, communication effects gaps arise, which probably make the cultural heritage encounter even more serious ecological crisis on the whole. In order to enhance understanding and explore the rule of online communication of cultural heritage, this paper put forward an angle of discussing the problem from the aspects of motivation, path and effect based on the investigation into the status quo of online communication of digital heritage. The status quo of online communication of digital cultural heritage is not optimistic. Select several well-known portal sites such as MSN, AOL and Yahoo! to make a rough survey of the web content, we find that it is not easy to acquire information about cultural heritage from t","PeriodicalId":52934,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Digital Heritage","volume":"102 1","pages":"429"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Online communication of digital heritage: Motivation, path, and effect\",\"authors\":\"Huaxiang He, Daopin Cheng, M. Mo\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DigitalHeritage.2013.6744797\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the 21st century, the ecology of communication of cultural heritage has changed significantly thanks in large part to new media technology. For the existing social order and cultural ecology, new media technology has both advantages and disadvantages. The advantages are apparent, but the disadvantages are hidden and less discussed by scientists exclude a few humanists. Here are some of the facts: (1) the more complex and vivid the media symbol environment is, the more beguiling the resulting stereotypes are, and the greater the likelihood is that people will mix up the real world with the cyberworld; (2) compared with traditional media such as radio and television, ethics anomie in network communication is more serious, especially the copyright infringement, defaming and invasion of privacy. (3) network changed people's space-time concept, formed specific bias of communication which makes certain types of information can more easily spread and be accepted than other information; (4) under the action of multi factors including above three elements, the mechanism of cultural inheritance and variation is destroyed, communication effects gaps arise, which probably make the cultural heritage encounter even more serious ecological crisis on the whole. In order to enhance understanding and explore the rule of online communication of cultural heritage, this paper put forward an angle of discussing the problem from the aspects of motivation, path and effect based on the investigation into the status quo of online communication of digital heritage. The status quo of online communication of digital cultural heritage is not optimistic. Select several well-known portal sites such as MSN, AOL and Yahoo! to make a rough survey of the web content, we find that it is not easy to acquire information about cultural heritage from t\",\"PeriodicalId\":52934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Digital Heritage\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"429\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Digital Heritage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DigitalHeritage.2013.6744797\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Digital Heritage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DigitalHeritage.2013.6744797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

21世纪以来,文化遗产传播生态发生了重大变化,这在很大程度上要归功于新媒体技术。对于现有的社会秩序和文化生态来说,新媒体技术有利有弊。优点是显而易见的,但缺点是隐藏的,很少被科学家讨论,排除了一些人文主义者。以下是一些事实:(1)媒体符号环境越复杂、越生动,由此产生的刻板印象就越具有欺骗性,人们越有可能将现实世界与网络世界混淆;(2)与广播、电视等传统媒体相比,网络传播中的道德失范更为严重,尤其是侵犯版权、诽谤和侵犯隐私等行为。(3)网络改变了人们的时空观念,形成了特定的传播偏见,使得某些类型的信息比其他信息更容易传播和被接受;(4)在以上三种因素的多重作用下,文化传承与变异的机制被破坏,传播效果出现缺口,可能使文化遗产整体遭遇更为严重的生态危机。为了增进对文化遗产网络传播规律的认识和探索,本文在对数字遗产网络传播现状调查的基础上,提出了从动机、路径和效果三个方面探讨问题的角度。数字文化遗产的在线传播现状不容乐观。选择几个知名的门户网站,如MSN、AOL和Yahoo!通过对网络内容的粗略调查,我们发现从中获取有关文化遗产的信息并不容易
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Online communication of digital heritage: Motivation, path, and effect
Since the 21st century, the ecology of communication of cultural heritage has changed significantly thanks in large part to new media technology. For the existing social order and cultural ecology, new media technology has both advantages and disadvantages. The advantages are apparent, but the disadvantages are hidden and less discussed by scientists exclude a few humanists. Here are some of the facts: (1) the more complex and vivid the media symbol environment is, the more beguiling the resulting stereotypes are, and the greater the likelihood is that people will mix up the real world with the cyberworld; (2) compared with traditional media such as radio and television, ethics anomie in network communication is more serious, especially the copyright infringement, defaming and invasion of privacy. (3) network changed people's space-time concept, formed specific bias of communication which makes certain types of information can more easily spread and be accepted than other information; (4) under the action of multi factors including above three elements, the mechanism of cultural inheritance and variation is destroyed, communication effects gaps arise, which probably make the cultural heritage encounter even more serious ecological crisis on the whole. In order to enhance understanding and explore the rule of online communication of cultural heritage, this paper put forward an angle of discussing the problem from the aspects of motivation, path and effect based on the investigation into the status quo of online communication of digital heritage. The status quo of online communication of digital cultural heritage is not optimistic. Select several well-known portal sites such as MSN, AOL and Yahoo! to make a rough survey of the web content, we find that it is not easy to acquire information about cultural heritage from t
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Digital Heritage
Studies in Digital Heritage Arts and Humanities-Classics
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信