从混合模态逻辑到匹配逻辑再回来

I. Leustean, Natalia Moanga, Traian-Florin Serbanuta
{"title":"从混合模态逻辑到匹配逻辑再回来","authors":"I. Leustean, Natalia Moanga, Traian-Florin Serbanuta","doi":"10.4204/EPTCS.303.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Building on our previous work on hybrid polyadic modal logic we identify modal logic equivalents for Matching Logic, a logic for program specification and verification. This provides a rigorous way to transfer results between the two approaches, which should benefit both systems.","PeriodicalId":9644,"journal":{"name":"Catalysis Surveys from Japan","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Hybrid Modal Logic to Matching Logic and back\",\"authors\":\"I. Leustean, Natalia Moanga, Traian-Florin Serbanuta\",\"doi\":\"10.4204/EPTCS.303.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Building on our previous work on hybrid polyadic modal logic we identify modal logic equivalents for Matching Logic, a logic for program specification and verification. This provides a rigorous way to transfer results between the two approaches, which should benefit both systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catalysis Surveys from Japan\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catalysis Surveys from Japan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.303.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catalysis Surveys from Japan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.303.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在我们之前关于混合多进模态逻辑的工作的基础上,我们确定了匹配逻辑的模态逻辑等价,这是一种用于程序规范和验证的逻辑。这提供了一种在两种方法之间传递结果的严格方法,这将使两个系统都受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From Hybrid Modal Logic to Matching Logic and back
Building on our previous work on hybrid polyadic modal logic we identify modal logic equivalents for Matching Logic, a logic for program specification and verification. This provides a rigorous way to transfer results between the two approaches, which should benefit both systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信