IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, SLAVIC
Alojzija Zupan Sosič
{"title":"Pripovedna empatija ter Cankarjeva romana Hiša Marije Pomočnice in Križ na gori","authors":"Alojzija Zupan Sosič","doi":"10.3986/PKN.V43.I1.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores narrative empathy associated with the novels The Ward of Mary Help of Christians and The Cross on the Mountain (both from 1904) by Ivan Cankar (1876–1918) in order to find out why the former, upon its publication, exceeded the readers’ horizon of expectation, thereby achieving less narrative empathy in readers, while the latter met their expectations to a greater degree at the receptive level, thus evoking more narrative empathy. I consider three paths, i.e. autobiographical representation, a high level of author’s empathy, aesthetics of production and the two possibilities for the readers to empathize – identification with the character and the narrative situation. The empathizing is also analyzed according to the three modes, so-called bounded, ambassadorial, and broadcast empathy. The disharmony between the empathy of the author and the reader shows that the novel The Ward of Mary Help of Christians received less empathy not because of the defectiveness of the empathy in the author but because of the defectiveness of the empathy in the readers of the novel. At the beginning of the twentieth century, Slovenian readers were unable to share the emotions and perspectives of this innovative novel, which is why they preferred The Cross on the Mountain. To explain the disharmony between the empathy of the author and the reader, the distinction between literary and trivial empathy also had to be taken into account; this difference again proves that the novel The Cross on the Mountain was suitable for the average reader open to trivial empathy, while The Ward of Mary Help of Christians required more demanding literary readers and their orientation towards literary empathy.","PeriodicalId":52032,"journal":{"name":"Primerjalna Knjizevnost","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primerjalna Knjizevnost","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3986/PKN.V43.I1.13","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, SLAVIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文通过对伊万·坎卡尔(1876-1918)1904年创作的小说《圣母的庇护》和《山上的十字架》的叙事共情进行探讨,探究为什么前者在出版时超出了读者的预期视野,从而使读者的叙事共情减少,而后者在接受层面上更符合读者的期望,从而引起更多的叙事共情。我考虑了三种路径,即自传体再现、作者高度的共情、生产美学和读者共情的两种可能性——对人物的认同和叙事情境的认同。共情分为有限共情、大使共情和广播共情三种模式。作者与读者共情的不协调表明,小说《基督教徒的玛利亚的庇护所》的共情少,不是因为作者的共情不足,而是因为小说读者的共情不足。在二十世纪初,斯洛文尼亚的读者无法分享这部创新小说的情感和观点,这就是为什么他们更喜欢《山上的十字架》。为了解释作者和读者的移情之间的不和谐,还必须考虑到文学移情和琐碎移情之间的区别;这种差异再次证明了小说《山上的十字架》适合普通读者,他们对琐碎的同理心开放,而《基督教徒的玛利亚的庇护》需要更苛刻的文学读者和他们对文学同理心的取向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pripovedna empatija ter Cankarjeva romana Hiša Marije Pomočnice in Križ na gori
This article explores narrative empathy associated with the novels The Ward of Mary Help of Christians and The Cross on the Mountain (both from 1904) by Ivan Cankar (1876–1918) in order to find out why the former, upon its publication, exceeded the readers’ horizon of expectation, thereby achieving less narrative empathy in readers, while the latter met their expectations to a greater degree at the receptive level, thus evoking more narrative empathy. I consider three paths, i.e. autobiographical representation, a high level of author’s empathy, aesthetics of production and the two possibilities for the readers to empathize – identification with the character and the narrative situation. The empathizing is also analyzed according to the three modes, so-called bounded, ambassadorial, and broadcast empathy. The disharmony between the empathy of the author and the reader shows that the novel The Ward of Mary Help of Christians received less empathy not because of the defectiveness of the empathy in the author but because of the defectiveness of the empathy in the readers of the novel. At the beginning of the twentieth century, Slovenian readers were unable to share the emotions and perspectives of this innovative novel, which is why they preferred The Cross on the Mountain. To explain the disharmony between the empathy of the author and the reader, the distinction between literary and trivial empathy also had to be taken into account; this difference again proves that the novel The Cross on the Mountain was suitable for the average reader open to trivial empathy, while The Ward of Mary Help of Christians required more demanding literary readers and their orientation towards literary empathy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Primerjalna Knjizevnost
Primerjalna Knjizevnost LITERATURE, SLAVIC-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信