支撑与剪力墙加固钢结构性能对比研究

Khairullah Yusuf, F. Fasdarsyah, Nura Usrina, M. Fauzan, Rahmi Nurahim
{"title":"支撑与剪力墙加固钢结构性能对比研究","authors":"Khairullah Yusuf, F. Fasdarsyah, Nura Usrina, M. Fauzan, Rahmi Nurahim","doi":"10.52088/ijesty.v3i2.456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multi-storey buildings are very susceptible to lateral forces, so reinforcement is needed to stiffen the building by adding a system of stiffeners to the building structure. In steel building structures, the system of stiffeners bracing and confessor shearwall can provide rigidity and strength by limiting the movement of the structure. In addition, the placement of stiffener systems in the right locations can also increase the rigidity of the building structure. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of structural behavior using a stiffener system based on the value of the fundamental period (T), the base shear force (V), the drift between stories (?x). In this research using a steel structure model that functions as an office building with a height of 10 levels, one variation of the model without stiffeners and four models with stiffeners, with two variations of the position of the stiffeners, namely in the middle and on the edge of the structure. The results of this study indicate that the addition of a stiffener system can increase the rigidity of the structure. The most effective structural model is found in the structural model with stiffeners shearwall the stiffener position in the middle which has a fundamental period value in the X and Y directions of 17.67% and 18.32% is better than the other models. For the base shear force values in the X and Y directions are 0.95% and 0.95% smaller than the other models. The deviation values between floor levels in the X and Y directions are 9.67% and 34.17% better than the other models. Meanwhile, the inefficient structural model is found in the structural model with stiffeners bracing on the edge which has a fundamental period value in the X and Y directions of 8.96% and 9.32% which is no better than the other models. For the base shear force values in the X and Y directions are 18.02% and 18.02% greater than the other models. The deviation values between floor levels in the X and Y directions are 1.69% and 13.15%, not better than the other models. So in this study it can be concluded that the stiffener system with a position in the middle is better than the position on the edge.","PeriodicalId":14149,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engineering, Science and Information Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of Strengthened Steel Structure Behavior Using Bracing and Shearwall\",\"authors\":\"Khairullah Yusuf, F. Fasdarsyah, Nura Usrina, M. Fauzan, Rahmi Nurahim\",\"doi\":\"10.52088/ijesty.v3i2.456\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Multi-storey buildings are very susceptible to lateral forces, so reinforcement is needed to stiffen the building by adding a system of stiffeners to the building structure. In steel building structures, the system of stiffeners bracing and confessor shearwall can provide rigidity and strength by limiting the movement of the structure. In addition, the placement of stiffener systems in the right locations can also increase the rigidity of the building structure. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of structural behavior using a stiffener system based on the value of the fundamental period (T), the base shear force (V), the drift between stories (?x). In this research using a steel structure model that functions as an office building with a height of 10 levels, one variation of the model without stiffeners and four models with stiffeners, with two variations of the position of the stiffeners, namely in the middle and on the edge of the structure. The results of this study indicate that the addition of a stiffener system can increase the rigidity of the structure. The most effective structural model is found in the structural model with stiffeners shearwall the stiffener position in the middle which has a fundamental period value in the X and Y directions of 17.67% and 18.32% is better than the other models. For the base shear force values in the X and Y directions are 0.95% and 0.95% smaller than the other models. The deviation values between floor levels in the X and Y directions are 9.67% and 34.17% better than the other models. Meanwhile, the inefficient structural model is found in the structural model with stiffeners bracing on the edge which has a fundamental period value in the X and Y directions of 8.96% and 9.32% which is no better than the other models. For the base shear force values in the X and Y directions are 18.02% and 18.02% greater than the other models. The deviation values between floor levels in the X and Y directions are 1.69% and 13.15%, not better than the other models. So in this study it can be concluded that the stiffener system with a position in the middle is better than the position on the edge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Engineering, Science and Information Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Engineering, Science and Information Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52088/ijesty.v3i2.456\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Engineering, Science and Information Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52088/ijesty.v3i2.456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多层建筑非常容易受到侧向力的影响,因此需要通过在建筑结构上添加加强筋系统来加强建筑物的刚度。在钢结构中,加强筋、支撑和剪力墙系统可以通过限制结构的运动来提供刚度和强度。此外,在正确的位置放置加劲系统也可以增加建筑结构的刚度。本研究旨在比较基于基本周期(T)值、基础剪力(V)、层间位移(?x)的加劲系统的结构性能的有效性。本研究采用10层楼高的办公楼钢结构模型,不加筋的模型有1种变化,加筋的模型有4种变化,加筋的位置有2种变化,即在结构的中间和边缘。研究结果表明,加筋系统可以提高结构的刚度。加筋剪力墙结构模型最有效,加筋位置在中间,X、Y方向的基本周期值分别为17.67%和18.32%,优于其他模型。对于基底,X和Y方向的剪力值分别比其他模型小0.95%和0.95%。X、Y方向楼层间偏差值分别比其他模型好9.67%和34.17%。边缘加筋支撑的结构模型为低效结构模型,其X、Y方向基本周期值分别为8.96%和9.32%,与其他模型相差无几。在X和Y方向上,基底剪力值分别比其他模型大18.02%和18.02%。X、Y方向楼层间偏差值分别为1.69%和13.15%,均不优于其他模型。因此,在本研究中,可以得出在中间位置的加劲肋体系优于在边缘位置的加劲肋体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Study of Strengthened Steel Structure Behavior Using Bracing and Shearwall
Multi-storey buildings are very susceptible to lateral forces, so reinforcement is needed to stiffen the building by adding a system of stiffeners to the building structure. In steel building structures, the system of stiffeners bracing and confessor shearwall can provide rigidity and strength by limiting the movement of the structure. In addition, the placement of stiffener systems in the right locations can also increase the rigidity of the building structure. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of structural behavior using a stiffener system based on the value of the fundamental period (T), the base shear force (V), the drift between stories (?x). In this research using a steel structure model that functions as an office building with a height of 10 levels, one variation of the model without stiffeners and four models with stiffeners, with two variations of the position of the stiffeners, namely in the middle and on the edge of the structure. The results of this study indicate that the addition of a stiffener system can increase the rigidity of the structure. The most effective structural model is found in the structural model with stiffeners shearwall the stiffener position in the middle which has a fundamental period value in the X and Y directions of 17.67% and 18.32% is better than the other models. For the base shear force values in the X and Y directions are 0.95% and 0.95% smaller than the other models. The deviation values between floor levels in the X and Y directions are 9.67% and 34.17% better than the other models. Meanwhile, the inefficient structural model is found in the structural model with stiffeners bracing on the edge which has a fundamental period value in the X and Y directions of 8.96% and 9.32% which is no better than the other models. For the base shear force values in the X and Y directions are 18.02% and 18.02% greater than the other models. The deviation values between floor levels in the X and Y directions are 1.69% and 13.15%, not better than the other models. So in this study it can be concluded that the stiffener system with a position in the middle is better than the position on the edge.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信