锆合金包覆U-Mo单片燃料板的热力学性能评价

IF 0.5 Q4 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
H. Ozaltun, J. Cole, B. Rabin
{"title":"锆合金包覆U-Mo单片燃料板的热力学性能评价","authors":"H. Ozaltun, J. Cole, B. Rabin","doi":"10.1115/1.4063163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Performance of two distinct fuel systems, U-7Mo fuel in zircaloy cladding and U-10Mo fuel in aluminum cladding was studied. First, a mini plate with zircaloy cladding from a previous experiment was evaluated via finite element analysis. By using the same plate geometry and irradiation conditions, another plate consisting of U-10Mo fuel and Al6061-O cladding was simulated. The results were then comparatively evaluated to explore the feasibility of employing zircaloy as an alternative cladding. Simulations indicated the zircaloy cladding plate would operate roughly 50°C hotter as compared with the Al alloy cladding plate. Larger deformations in the thickness direction for the plate with zircaloy cladding were noted. It was observed that the post-fabrication stresses in the fuel would be relieved quickly in the reactor, regardless of cladding type. Although the fuel stresses would still develop at reactor shutdown, the fuel would be stress-free during the irradiation for both cladding types. At shutdown, the plate with zircaloy cladding would have higher stresses due to higher operating temperatures. Similarly, the stresses after shutdown are higher in the foil core for the plates with zircaloy cladding. The Al cladding plate would have higher plastic strains as compared with the zircaloy cladding plate. The zircaloy cladding plate is significantly stiffer, causing higher stresses in the fuel and at the interface. Overall, employing zircaloy as an alternate cladding is not expected to produce a more favorable thermomechanical performance as compared to the performance of an Al alloy cladding plate.","PeriodicalId":16756,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thermomechanical Performance Assessment of U-Mo Monolithic Fuel Plates with Zircaloy Cladding\",\"authors\":\"H. Ozaltun, J. Cole, B. Rabin\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4063163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Performance of two distinct fuel systems, U-7Mo fuel in zircaloy cladding and U-10Mo fuel in aluminum cladding was studied. First, a mini plate with zircaloy cladding from a previous experiment was evaluated via finite element analysis. By using the same plate geometry and irradiation conditions, another plate consisting of U-10Mo fuel and Al6061-O cladding was simulated. The results were then comparatively evaluated to explore the feasibility of employing zircaloy as an alternative cladding. Simulations indicated the zircaloy cladding plate would operate roughly 50°C hotter as compared with the Al alloy cladding plate. Larger deformations in the thickness direction for the plate with zircaloy cladding were noted. It was observed that the post-fabrication stresses in the fuel would be relieved quickly in the reactor, regardless of cladding type. Although the fuel stresses would still develop at reactor shutdown, the fuel would be stress-free during the irradiation for both cladding types. At shutdown, the plate with zircaloy cladding would have higher stresses due to higher operating temperatures. Similarly, the stresses after shutdown are higher in the foil core for the plates with zircaloy cladding. The Al cladding plate would have higher plastic strains as compared with the zircaloy cladding plate. The zircaloy cladding plate is significantly stiffer, causing higher stresses in the fuel and at the interface. Overall, employing zircaloy as an alternate cladding is not expected to produce a more favorable thermomechanical performance as compared to the performance of an Al alloy cladding plate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063163\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究了锆合金包壳中铀- 7mo燃料和铝包壳中铀- 10mo燃料两种不同燃料系统的性能。首先,通过有限元分析对先前实验中锆合金包层的微型板进行了评估。采用相同的板形和辐照条件,模拟了另一个由U-10Mo燃料和Al6061-O包层组成的板。然后对结果进行了比较评价,以探索采用锆合金作为替代包层的可行性。模拟结果表明,锆合金复板比铝合金复板工作温度高50℃左右。锆合金包层板在厚度方向上有较大的变形。观察到,无论包层类型如何,燃料中的制造后应力都会在反应堆中迅速缓解。尽管在反应堆关闭时燃料应力仍然会产生,但在辐照期间,两种包层类型的燃料都是无应力的。在停机时,由于较高的工作温度,锆合金包层板将具有较高的应力。同样,锆合金包覆板的箔芯在关闭后的应力也较高。与锆合金复板相比,铝复板具有更高的塑性应变。锆合金复板明显变硬,在燃料和界面处造成更高的应力。总的来说,与铝合金包层相比,采用锆合金作为替代包层并不会产生更有利的热机械性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thermomechanical Performance Assessment of U-Mo Monolithic Fuel Plates with Zircaloy Cladding
Performance of two distinct fuel systems, U-7Mo fuel in zircaloy cladding and U-10Mo fuel in aluminum cladding was studied. First, a mini plate with zircaloy cladding from a previous experiment was evaluated via finite element analysis. By using the same plate geometry and irradiation conditions, another plate consisting of U-10Mo fuel and Al6061-O cladding was simulated. The results were then comparatively evaluated to explore the feasibility of employing zircaloy as an alternative cladding. Simulations indicated the zircaloy cladding plate would operate roughly 50°C hotter as compared with the Al alloy cladding plate. Larger deformations in the thickness direction for the plate with zircaloy cladding were noted. It was observed that the post-fabrication stresses in the fuel would be relieved quickly in the reactor, regardless of cladding type. Although the fuel stresses would still develop at reactor shutdown, the fuel would be stress-free during the irradiation for both cladding types. At shutdown, the plate with zircaloy cladding would have higher stresses due to higher operating temperatures. Similarly, the stresses after shutdown are higher in the foil core for the plates with zircaloy cladding. The Al cladding plate would have higher plastic strains as compared with the zircaloy cladding plate. The zircaloy cladding plate is significantly stiffer, causing higher stresses in the fuel and at the interface. Overall, employing zircaloy as an alternate cladding is not expected to produce a more favorable thermomechanical performance as compared to the performance of an Al alloy cladding plate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science is ASME’s latest title within the energy sector. The publication is for specialists in the nuclear/power engineering areas of industry, academia, and government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信