择期眼科手术患者喉罩气道尺寸选择的颈部特征评估横断面研究

O. Aghadavoudi, H. Shetabi, H. Saryazdi, Susan Babayi
{"title":"择期眼科手术患者喉罩气道尺寸选择的颈部特征评估横断面研究","authors":"O. Aghadavoudi, H. Shetabi, H. Saryazdi, Susan Babayi","doi":"10.30476/BEAT.2022.94356.1338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To investigate the neck features for laryngeal mask airway (LMA) size selection. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 160 patients referred for elective surgeries to Feiz Hospital affiliated with Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran (April 2016 to September 2018). Patients underwent ventilation using LMA whose size was determined through a weighted-based approach. All of the patients’ neck characteristics including circumference, thyromental distance, and opening mouth were measured. Ventilation factors were recorded including numbers of attempts for successful LMA insertion, quality of ventilation, and sealing. Results: Neck circumference and thyromental distance were significantly different with the size of LMA (p<0.0001 and p=0.005, respectively), but not mouth opening (p=0.21). Neck circumference, thyromental distance, and mouth opening were not significantly different with the times of insertion attempts (p>0.05 for all comparisons). However, the thyromental distance was significantly different with the quality ventilation status (p<0.0001). The total assessment of insertion attempts, ventilation efficacy and sealing was significantly different with the neck circumference (p<0.001), but thyromental distance did not show a significant difference (p>0.05). Conclusion: Findings demonstrated that neck circumference might be considered as an appropriate indicator for the selection of LMA size but neither the thyromental distance nor mouth opening. Further studies with a larger sample size are strongly recommended.","PeriodicalId":9328,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Emergency & Trauma","volume":"87 1","pages":"77 - 82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Neck Characteristics for Laryngeal Mask Airway Size Selection in Patients Who Underwent an Elective Ocular Surgery; A Cross-Sectional Study\",\"authors\":\"O. Aghadavoudi, H. Shetabi, H. Saryazdi, Susan Babayi\",\"doi\":\"10.30476/BEAT.2022.94356.1338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To investigate the neck features for laryngeal mask airway (LMA) size selection. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 160 patients referred for elective surgeries to Feiz Hospital affiliated with Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran (April 2016 to September 2018). Patients underwent ventilation using LMA whose size was determined through a weighted-based approach. All of the patients’ neck characteristics including circumference, thyromental distance, and opening mouth were measured. Ventilation factors were recorded including numbers of attempts for successful LMA insertion, quality of ventilation, and sealing. Results: Neck circumference and thyromental distance were significantly different with the size of LMA (p<0.0001 and p=0.005, respectively), but not mouth opening (p=0.21). Neck circumference, thyromental distance, and mouth opening were not significantly different with the times of insertion attempts (p>0.05 for all comparisons). However, the thyromental distance was significantly different with the quality ventilation status (p<0.0001). The total assessment of insertion attempts, ventilation efficacy and sealing was significantly different with the neck circumference (p<0.001), but thyromental distance did not show a significant difference (p>0.05). Conclusion: Findings demonstrated that neck circumference might be considered as an appropriate indicator for the selection of LMA size but neither the thyromental distance nor mouth opening. Further studies with a larger sample size are strongly recommended.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Emergency & Trauma\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"77 - 82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Emergency & Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30476/BEAT.2022.94356.1338\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Emergency & Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/BEAT.2022.94356.1338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨喉罩气道(LMA)尺寸选择的颈部特征。方法:对2016年4月至2018年9月在伊朗伊斯法罕医科大学附属菲兹医院转诊的160例择期手术患者进行横断面研究。患者使用LMA进行通气,LMA的大小通过加权方法确定。测量所有患者的颈部特征,包括围度、甲状腺距离和开口。记录通气因素,包括成功插入LMA的次数、通气质量和密封。结果:颈围、甲状腺距离与LMA大小差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。然而,甲状腺距离与通气质量有显著性差异(p0.05)。结论:颈围可作为选择LMA大小的合适指标,而甲状腺距离和开口均不能作为选择LMA大小的合适指标。强烈建议进行更大样本量的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Neck Characteristics for Laryngeal Mask Airway Size Selection in Patients Who Underwent an Elective Ocular Surgery; A Cross-Sectional Study
Objective: To investigate the neck features for laryngeal mask airway (LMA) size selection. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 160 patients referred for elective surgeries to Feiz Hospital affiliated with Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran (April 2016 to September 2018). Patients underwent ventilation using LMA whose size was determined through a weighted-based approach. All of the patients’ neck characteristics including circumference, thyromental distance, and opening mouth were measured. Ventilation factors were recorded including numbers of attempts for successful LMA insertion, quality of ventilation, and sealing. Results: Neck circumference and thyromental distance were significantly different with the size of LMA (p<0.0001 and p=0.005, respectively), but not mouth opening (p=0.21). Neck circumference, thyromental distance, and mouth opening were not significantly different with the times of insertion attempts (p>0.05 for all comparisons). However, the thyromental distance was significantly different with the quality ventilation status (p<0.0001). The total assessment of insertion attempts, ventilation efficacy and sealing was significantly different with the neck circumference (p<0.001), but thyromental distance did not show a significant difference (p>0.05). Conclusion: Findings demonstrated that neck circumference might be considered as an appropriate indicator for the selection of LMA size but neither the thyromental distance nor mouth opening. Further studies with a larger sample size are strongly recommended.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信