{"title":"高等教育质量保证培训:有效设计和成功交付的实践见解","authors":"Anca Greere","doi":"10.1080/13538322.2021.2020978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Derived from practical experience, this article outlines key aspects to be considered when developing a training programme focused on quality assurance in higher education and suggests possible measures of success for training delivery. Practice-based professional reflections are systematised into an applicable, duly tested, quality assurance training model that can be transferred and adapted for diverse national and international contexts. The distinction between two training types guides the analysis and allows for differentiated conclusions regarding context, content, delivery and anticipated outcomes. Advanced quality assurance professional development training for appointed quality assurance professionals is compared and contrasted to initial quality assurance capacity building for other stakeholder groups, such as academics, administrators or students. The main aim is to determine underlying principles for training design and delivery to ensure a positive experience that relevantly responds to individual training needs and determines a lasting professional impact.","PeriodicalId":46354,"journal":{"name":"Quality in Higher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Training for quality assurance in higher education: practical insights for effective design and successful delivery\",\"authors\":\"Anca Greere\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13538322.2021.2020978\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Derived from practical experience, this article outlines key aspects to be considered when developing a training programme focused on quality assurance in higher education and suggests possible measures of success for training delivery. Practice-based professional reflections are systematised into an applicable, duly tested, quality assurance training model that can be transferred and adapted for diverse national and international contexts. The distinction between two training types guides the analysis and allows for differentiated conclusions regarding context, content, delivery and anticipated outcomes. Advanced quality assurance professional development training for appointed quality assurance professionals is compared and contrasted to initial quality assurance capacity building for other stakeholder groups, such as academics, administrators or students. The main aim is to determine underlying principles for training design and delivery to ensure a positive experience that relevantly responds to individual training needs and determines a lasting professional impact.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality in Higher Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality in Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2021.2020978\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2021.2020978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Training for quality assurance in higher education: practical insights for effective design and successful delivery
Abstract Derived from practical experience, this article outlines key aspects to be considered when developing a training programme focused on quality assurance in higher education and suggests possible measures of success for training delivery. Practice-based professional reflections are systematised into an applicable, duly tested, quality assurance training model that can be transferred and adapted for diverse national and international contexts. The distinction between two training types guides the analysis and allows for differentiated conclusions regarding context, content, delivery and anticipated outcomes. Advanced quality assurance professional development training for appointed quality assurance professionals is compared and contrasted to initial quality assurance capacity building for other stakeholder groups, such as academics, administrators or students. The main aim is to determine underlying principles for training design and delivery to ensure a positive experience that relevantly responds to individual training needs and determines a lasting professional impact.
期刊介绍:
Quality in Higher Education is aimed at those interested in the theory, practice and policies relating to the control, management and improvement of quality in higher education. The journal is receptive to critical, phenomenological as well as positivistic studies. The journal would like to publish more studies that use hermeneutic, semiotic, ethnographic or dialectical research as well as the more traditional studies based on quantitative surveys and in-depth interviews and focus groups. Papers that have empirical research content are particularly welcome. The editor especially wishes to encourage papers on: reported research results, especially where these assess the impact of quality assurance systems, procedures and methodologies; theoretical analyses of quality and quality initiatives in higher education; comparative evaluation and international aspects of practice and policy with a view to identifying transportable methods, systems and good practice; quality assurance and standards monitoring of transnational higher education; the nature and impact and student feedback; improvements in learning and teaching that impact on quality and standards; links between quality assurance and employability; evaluations of the impact of quality procedures at national level, backed up by research evidence.