商品运输:用期权对冲价格、需求和运费风险

IF 0.1 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
T. Soltani, A. Chockalingam, J. Fransoo, Chung-Yee Lee
{"title":"商品运输:用期权对冲价格、需求和运费风险","authors":"T. Soltani, A. Chockalingam, J. Fransoo, Chung-Yee Lee","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2661571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Like options on stocks, options on commodities provide firms with protection against adverse price movements. Many firms procure commodity at an offshore location and transport it via ocean freight. Increased globalization and increased demand for ocean-based transportation has resulted in ocean freight itself becoming a volatile commodity. We consider a commodity processor and develop models to determine the firm’s optimal hedging policy. The models allow for three sources of uncertainty; demand, commodity spot price and freight rate. The scenarios differ based on assumptions on independence between the uncertainties, and also assumptions on market competitiveness. The optimal hedging policies are variants of the classical newsvendor critical fractile. We show that partially procuring the commodity and its freight through option contracts, rather than entirely on the volatile spot market creates value, even for a risk-neutral firm. We then perform extensive numerical experiments to study the influence of the underlying parameters on the optimal hedging policies and value creation.","PeriodicalId":49886,"journal":{"name":"Manufacturing Engineering","volume":"79 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transporting Commodities: Hedging Against Price, Demand and Freight Rate Risk with Options\",\"authors\":\"T. Soltani, A. Chockalingam, J. Fransoo, Chung-Yee Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2661571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Like options on stocks, options on commodities provide firms with protection against adverse price movements. Many firms procure commodity at an offshore location and transport it via ocean freight. Increased globalization and increased demand for ocean-based transportation has resulted in ocean freight itself becoming a volatile commodity. We consider a commodity processor and develop models to determine the firm’s optimal hedging policy. The models allow for three sources of uncertainty; demand, commodity spot price and freight rate. The scenarios differ based on assumptions on independence between the uncertainties, and also assumptions on market competitiveness. The optimal hedging policies are variants of the classical newsvendor critical fractile. We show that partially procuring the commodity and its freight through option contracts, rather than entirely on the volatile spot market creates value, even for a risk-neutral firm. We then perform extensive numerical experiments to study the influence of the underlying parameters on the optimal hedging policies and value creation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Manufacturing Engineering\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Manufacturing Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2661571\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manufacturing Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2661571","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

与股票期权一样,大宗商品期权为公司提供了抵御不利价格变动的保护。许多公司在离岸地点采购商品,然后通过海运运输。全球化程度的提高和对海洋运输需求的增加导致海洋货运本身成为一种不稳定的商品。我们考虑一个商品加工商,并开发模型来确定该公司的最优对冲政策。这些模型考虑到三个不确定性来源;需求、商品现货价格及运价。基于对不确定性之间的独立性的假设,以及对市场竞争力的假设,这些情景有所不同。最优套期保值策略是经典报摊临界分形的变体。我们证明,即使对风险中性的公司来说,通过期权合约部分采购商品及其运费,而不是完全在波动的现货市场上采购,也能创造价值。然后,我们进行了广泛的数值实验,以研究基础参数对最优对冲政策和价值创造的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transporting Commodities: Hedging Against Price, Demand and Freight Rate Risk with Options
Like options on stocks, options on commodities provide firms with protection against adverse price movements. Many firms procure commodity at an offshore location and transport it via ocean freight. Increased globalization and increased demand for ocean-based transportation has resulted in ocean freight itself becoming a volatile commodity. We consider a commodity processor and develop models to determine the firm’s optimal hedging policy. The models allow for three sources of uncertainty; demand, commodity spot price and freight rate. The scenarios differ based on assumptions on independence between the uncertainties, and also assumptions on market competitiveness. The optimal hedging policies are variants of the classical newsvendor critical fractile. We show that partially procuring the commodity and its freight through option contracts, rather than entirely on the volatile spot market creates value, even for a risk-neutral firm. We then perform extensive numerical experiments to study the influence of the underlying parameters on the optimal hedging policies and value creation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Manufacturing Engineering
Manufacturing Engineering 工程技术-工程:制造
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信