{"title":"墨西哥女教师子样本中的国际体育活动问卷(IPAQ)长表的有效性和可靠性。","authors":"Catalina Medina, Adriana Monge, Edgar Denova-Gutiérrez, Ruy López-Ridaura, Simón Barquera, Isabelle Romieu, Martín Lajous","doi":"10.21149/12889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the test-retest reliability and validity of the long-form International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-long form).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A subsample of 86 teachers underwent telephone interviews and clinic visits in Mexico City. Through 22 months, physical activity (PA) levels were obtained from accelerometers (months 6 and 22) and IPAQ long-form (months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12). Minutes per week of moderate (MPA), walking (WPA), vigorous (VPA) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) were calculated for each intensity and domain. Variables were loga-rithmically transformed. Intra-class and Pearson correlations were used to determine the relationship between instru-ments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Test-retest reliability of the average IPAQs long-form varied across intensities and domains (ranged from r= 0.24 to r= 0.65). Minutes per week of VPA and MVPA ac-celerometer 1 (AC1) were fairly associated to International Physical Activity Questionnaire-long form 3 (IPAQ3) (r= 0.60 and r= 0.31, respectively) one week apart.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IPAQ long-form is fairly reliable for MVPA and valid for as-sessing MVPA and VPA in a subsample of Mexican teachers.</p>","PeriodicalId":43316,"journal":{"name":"MEDIUM AEVUM","volume":"61 1","pages":"57-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and reliability of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) long-form in a subsample of female Mexican teachers.\",\"authors\":\"Catalina Medina, Adriana Monge, Edgar Denova-Gutiérrez, Ruy López-Ridaura, Simón Barquera, Isabelle Romieu, Martín Lajous\",\"doi\":\"10.21149/12889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the test-retest reliability and validity of the long-form International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-long form).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A subsample of 86 teachers underwent telephone interviews and clinic visits in Mexico City. Through 22 months, physical activity (PA) levels were obtained from accelerometers (months 6 and 22) and IPAQ long-form (months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12). Minutes per week of moderate (MPA), walking (WPA), vigorous (VPA) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) were calculated for each intensity and domain. Variables were loga-rithmically transformed. Intra-class and Pearson correlations were used to determine the relationship between instru-ments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Test-retest reliability of the average IPAQs long-form varied across intensities and domains (ranged from r= 0.24 to r= 0.65). Minutes per week of VPA and MVPA ac-celerometer 1 (AC1) were fairly associated to International Physical Activity Questionnaire-long form 3 (IPAQ3) (r= 0.60 and r= 0.31, respectively) one week apart.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IPAQ long-form is fairly reliable for MVPA and valid for as-sessing MVPA and VPA in a subsample of Mexican teachers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MEDIUM AEVUM\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"57-65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MEDIUM AEVUM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21149/12889\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MEDIUM AEVUM","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21149/12889","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validity and reliability of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) long-form in a subsample of female Mexican teachers.
Objective: To evaluate the test-retest reliability and validity of the long-form International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-long form).
Materials and methods: A subsample of 86 teachers underwent telephone interviews and clinic visits in Mexico City. Through 22 months, physical activity (PA) levels were obtained from accelerometers (months 6 and 22) and IPAQ long-form (months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12). Minutes per week of moderate (MPA), walking (WPA), vigorous (VPA) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) were calculated for each intensity and domain. Variables were loga-rithmically transformed. Intra-class and Pearson correlations were used to determine the relationship between instru-ments.
Results: Test-retest reliability of the average IPAQs long-form varied across intensities and domains (ranged from r= 0.24 to r= 0.65). Minutes per week of VPA and MVPA ac-celerometer 1 (AC1) were fairly associated to International Physical Activity Questionnaire-long form 3 (IPAQ3) (r= 0.60 and r= 0.31, respectively) one week apart.
Conclusions: IPAQ long-form is fairly reliable for MVPA and valid for as-sessing MVPA and VPA in a subsample of Mexican teachers.
期刊介绍:
The Society of the Study of Medieval Languages and Literature are the owners and publishers of Medium Ævum. The journal, which first appeared in 1932, is one of the leading international academic periodicals in medieval studies. It is published twice yearly and its present editors are Professors Nigel F. Palmer, Sylvia Huot and Corinne Saunders.