图书可得性作为图书馆的绩效指标:健康科学图书馆的有效性分析

H. Rashid
{"title":"图书可得性作为图书馆的绩效指标:健康科学图书馆的有效性分析","authors":"H. Rashid","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199010)41:7%3C501::AID-ASI4%3E3.0.CO;2-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"User satisfaction as a measure of library effectiveness has been studied by using Kantor's branching technique. Cleveland Health Sciences Library, Cleveland, Ohio, was used as the center of this study. The study measured independently the user bibliographic information performance, collection development policy performance, acquisition policy performance, user catalog performance, circulation performance, library operation/functioning performance, and the user search performance. Each of these categories represented one or more of the factors of library performance that could account for the possibility of users' failure. The sample size consisted of 1000 requests for book titles. The book availability rates were 59.60% without the help of the librarian and 63.50% with the help of the librarian. The results indicate that a dynamic study of library policies at regular intervals by using the Kantor's method, which is easily reproducible, can maximize library resources for the most effective fulfillment of user demand.","PeriodicalId":79676,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science. American Society for Information Science","volume":"6 1","pages":"501-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book availability as a performance measure of a library: An analysis of the effectiveness of a health sciences library\",\"authors\":\"H. Rashid\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199010)41:7%3C501::AID-ASI4%3E3.0.CO;2-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"User satisfaction as a measure of library effectiveness has been studied by using Kantor's branching technique. Cleveland Health Sciences Library, Cleveland, Ohio, was used as the center of this study. The study measured independently the user bibliographic information performance, collection development policy performance, acquisition policy performance, user catalog performance, circulation performance, library operation/functioning performance, and the user search performance. Each of these categories represented one or more of the factors of library performance that could account for the possibility of users' failure. The sample size consisted of 1000 requests for book titles. The book availability rates were 59.60% without the help of the librarian and 63.50% with the help of the librarian. The results indicate that a dynamic study of library policies at regular intervals by using the Kantor's method, which is easily reproducible, can maximize library resources for the most effective fulfillment of user demand.\",\"PeriodicalId\":79676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Society for Information Science. American Society for Information Science\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"501-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Society for Information Science. American Society for Information Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199010)41:7%3C501::AID-ASI4%3E3.0.CO;2-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science. American Society for Information Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199010)41:7%3C501::AID-ASI4%3E3.0.CO;2-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

用户满意度作为衡量图书馆有效性的一个指标,已经通过使用坎特的分支技术进行了研究。本研究以俄亥俄州克利夫兰市克利夫兰健康科学图书馆为研究中心。本研究独立测量了用户书目信息绩效、馆藏发展政策绩效、采办政策绩效、用户目录绩效、流通绩效、图书馆运营/功能绩效和用户搜索绩效。这些类别中的每一个都代表了可能导致用户失败的库性能的一个或多个因素。样本大小包括1000个对书名的请求。无图书馆员帮助的图书可得率为59.60%,有图书馆员帮助的图书可得率为63.50%。结果表明,利用Kantor方法对图书馆政策进行定期动态研究,可以最大限度地利用图书馆资源,最有效地满足用户需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Book availability as a performance measure of a library: An analysis of the effectiveness of a health sciences library
User satisfaction as a measure of library effectiveness has been studied by using Kantor's branching technique. Cleveland Health Sciences Library, Cleveland, Ohio, was used as the center of this study. The study measured independently the user bibliographic information performance, collection development policy performance, acquisition policy performance, user catalog performance, circulation performance, library operation/functioning performance, and the user search performance. Each of these categories represented one or more of the factors of library performance that could account for the possibility of users' failure. The sample size consisted of 1000 requests for book titles. The book availability rates were 59.60% without the help of the librarian and 63.50% with the help of the librarian. The results indicate that a dynamic study of library policies at regular intervals by using the Kantor's method, which is easily reproducible, can maximize library resources for the most effective fulfillment of user demand.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信