Lynn R Webster, Ernest A Kopecky, Michael D Smith, Alison B Fleming
{"title":"一项随机、双盲、双哑剂研究,旨在评估新型缓释阻断滥用制剂羟考酮的鼻内人体滥用潜力和药代动力学。","authors":"Lynn R Webster, Ernest A Kopecky, Michael D Smith, Alison B Fleming","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnv020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate the human abuse potential (HAP) of an experimental, microsphere-in-capsule formulation of extended-release oxycodone (oxycodone DETERx®) (herein \"DETERx\").</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, positive- and placebo-controlled, single-dose, four-phase, four-treatment, crossover study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Clinical research site.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>There were 39 qualifying subjects (72% male, 85% white, mean age of 27 years) with 36 completing all four Double-blind Treatment Periods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The four phases encompassed: 1) Screening; 2) Drug Discrimination; 3) Double-blind Treatment; and 4) Follow-up. Drug Discrimination tests ensured that subjects could distinguish placebo from opioid. The four Double-blind Treatments compared DETERx-administered as either a crushed intranasal (IN) or an intact oral (PO) preparation-with immediate-release oxycodone IN (OXY-IR IN) and with an intact IN and PO placebo DETERx control.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For primary pharmacokinetic (PK) assessments, abuse quotient (Cmax/Tmax) was lower with DETERx IN than DETERx PO; both treatments were substantially lower than OXY-IR IN (6.24, 8.60, and 69.6 ng/mL/h, respectively). For drug liking, the primary subjective pharmacodynamic (PD) endpoint, both DETERx IN and DETERx PO produced significantly lower scores than OXY-IR IN (P ≤ 0.0001 for each); DETERx IN was less liked than DETERx PO (P ≤ 0.05), mirroring the PK relationships. Objectively assessed pupillometry corroborated the more rapid and significantly greater effect of OXY-IR IN than either DETERx IN or DETERx PO (P ≤ 0.007 for each). Overall safety profiles of DETERx and OXY-IR were comparable and both were well tolerated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic outcomes suggest that DETERx IN has relatively low HAP; continued research in larger populations is suggested.</p>","PeriodicalId":19909,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine: The Official Journal of the American Academy of Pain Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4894244/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Study to Evaluate the Intranasal Human Abuse Potential and Pharmacokinetics of a Novel Extended-Release Abuse-Deterrent Formulation of Oxycodone.\",\"authors\":\"Lynn R Webster, Ernest A Kopecky, Michael D Smith, Alison B Fleming\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/pm/pnv020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate the human abuse potential (HAP) of an experimental, microsphere-in-capsule formulation of extended-release oxycodone (oxycodone DETERx®) (herein \\\"DETERx\\\").</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, positive- and placebo-controlled, single-dose, four-phase, four-treatment, crossover study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Clinical research site.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>There were 39 qualifying subjects (72% male, 85% white, mean age of 27 years) with 36 completing all four Double-blind Treatment Periods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The four phases encompassed: 1) Screening; 2) Drug Discrimination; 3) Double-blind Treatment; and 4) Follow-up. Drug Discrimination tests ensured that subjects could distinguish placebo from opioid. The four Double-blind Treatments compared DETERx-administered as either a crushed intranasal (IN) or an intact oral (PO) preparation-with immediate-release oxycodone IN (OXY-IR IN) and with an intact IN and PO placebo DETERx control.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For primary pharmacokinetic (PK) assessments, abuse quotient (Cmax/Tmax) was lower with DETERx IN than DETERx PO; both treatments were substantially lower than OXY-IR IN (6.24, 8.60, and 69.6 ng/mL/h, respectively). For drug liking, the primary subjective pharmacodynamic (PD) endpoint, both DETERx IN and DETERx PO produced significantly lower scores than OXY-IR IN (P ≤ 0.0001 for each); DETERx IN was less liked than DETERx PO (P ≤ 0.05), mirroring the PK relationships. Objectively assessed pupillometry corroborated the more rapid and significantly greater effect of OXY-IR IN than either DETERx IN or DETERx PO (P ≤ 0.007 for each). Overall safety profiles of DETERx and OXY-IR were comparable and both were well tolerated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic outcomes suggest that DETERx IN has relatively low HAP; continued research in larger populations is suggested.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Medicine: The Official Journal of the American Academy of Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4894244/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Medicine: The Official Journal of the American Academy of Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnv020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2015/12/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Medicine: The Official Journal of the American Academy of Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnv020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/12/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评估缓释羟考酮(羟考酮 DETERx®)(以下简称 "DETERx")实验性微球胶囊制剂的人体滥用潜力(HAP):随机、双盲、双假、阳性和安慰剂对照、单剂量、四阶段、四疗程、交叉研究:受试者共有 39 名合格受试者(72% 为男性,85% 为白人,平均年龄为 27 岁),其中 36 人完成了全部四个双盲治疗期:四个阶段包括1)筛选;2)药物辨别;3)双盲治疗;4)随访。药物鉴别测试确保受试者能够区分安慰剂和阿片类药物。四次双盲治疗将 DETERx(以压碎的鼻内(IN)或完整的口服(PO)制剂给药)与速释羟考酮 IN(OXY-IR IN)以及完整的 IN 和口服安慰剂 DETERx 对照组进行了比较:在主要药代动力学(PK)评估中,DETERx IN 的滥用商数(Cmax/Tmax)低于 DETERx PO;两种疗法的滥用商数(Cmax/Tmax)均大大低于 OXY-IR IN(分别为 6.24、8.60 和 69.6 纳克/毫升/小时)。在药物喜欢度(主要的主观药效学终点)方面,DETERx IN 和 DETERx PO 的得分均显著低于 OXY-IR IN(各 P ≤ 0.0001);DETERx IN 的喜欢度低于 DETERx PO(P ≤ 0.05),反映了 PK 关系。客观评估的瞳孔测量法证实,OXY-IR IN 比 DETERx IN 或 DETERx PO 的作用更迅速且明显更大(P 均≤ 0.007)。DETERx 和 OXY-IR 的总体安全性相当,耐受性良好:结论:药代动力学和药效学结果表明,DETERx IN 的 HAP 相对较低;建议继续在更大的人群中进行研究。
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Study to Evaluate the Intranasal Human Abuse Potential and Pharmacokinetics of a Novel Extended-Release Abuse-Deterrent Formulation of Oxycodone.
Objective: Evaluate the human abuse potential (HAP) of an experimental, microsphere-in-capsule formulation of extended-release oxycodone (oxycodone DETERx®) (herein "DETERx").
Subjects: There were 39 qualifying subjects (72% male, 85% white, mean age of 27 years) with 36 completing all four Double-blind Treatment Periods.
Methods: The four phases encompassed: 1) Screening; 2) Drug Discrimination; 3) Double-blind Treatment; and 4) Follow-up. Drug Discrimination tests ensured that subjects could distinguish placebo from opioid. The four Double-blind Treatments compared DETERx-administered as either a crushed intranasal (IN) or an intact oral (PO) preparation-with immediate-release oxycodone IN (OXY-IR IN) and with an intact IN and PO placebo DETERx control.
Results: For primary pharmacokinetic (PK) assessments, abuse quotient (Cmax/Tmax) was lower with DETERx IN than DETERx PO; both treatments were substantially lower than OXY-IR IN (6.24, 8.60, and 69.6 ng/mL/h, respectively). For drug liking, the primary subjective pharmacodynamic (PD) endpoint, both DETERx IN and DETERx PO produced significantly lower scores than OXY-IR IN (P ≤ 0.0001 for each); DETERx IN was less liked than DETERx PO (P ≤ 0.05), mirroring the PK relationships. Objectively assessed pupillometry corroborated the more rapid and significantly greater effect of OXY-IR IN than either DETERx IN or DETERx PO (P ≤ 0.007 for each). Overall safety profiles of DETERx and OXY-IR were comparable and both were well tolerated.
Conclusions: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic outcomes suggest that DETERx IN has relatively low HAP; continued research in larger populations is suggested.