最小二乘有限元法、混合伽辽金有限元法和隐式FDM在声散射中的应用比较

Carlos E. Cadenas, Vianey Villamizar
{"title":"最小二乘有限元法、混合伽辽金有限元法和隐式FDM在声散射中的应用比较","authors":"Carlos E. Cadenas,&nbsp;Vianey Villamizar","doi":"10.1002/anac.200310011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper compares the performances of a least squares finite element method (LSFEM), a mixed Galerkin finite element method (MGFEM), and an implicit finite difference method (IFDM), when they are applied to an acoustic scattering problem modelled by the one-dimensional Helmholtz equation. First, the boundary value problem is written as a first order system of differential equations, and variational formulations for the LSFEM and MGFEM are derived. Then, by using appropriate basis functions, the stiffness matrices and load vectors which define the corresponding linear algebraic systems are obtained. In all cases, the stiffness matrix is banded and for the LSFEM it is also Hermitian. Numerical tests show that all these methods have quadratic convergence to the exact solution. However, their efficiency assessed in terms of the number of nodes and computing time required to reach quadratic convergence varies. It is observed that LSFEM requires many more nodes and employs much more time than MGFEM and IFDM to reach the quadratic convergence for high frequencies. It is also found that MGFEM has less numerical dispersion and, as a consequence, performs better than IFDM and LSFEM for high frequencies. (© 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim)</p>","PeriodicalId":100108,"journal":{"name":"Applied Numerical Analysis & Computational Mathematics","volume":"1 1","pages":"128-139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/anac.200310011","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Least Squares FEM, Mixed Galerkin FEM and an Implicit FDM Applied to Acoustic Scattering\",\"authors\":\"Carlos E. Cadenas,&nbsp;Vianey Villamizar\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/anac.200310011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper compares the performances of a least squares finite element method (LSFEM), a mixed Galerkin finite element method (MGFEM), and an implicit finite difference method (IFDM), when they are applied to an acoustic scattering problem modelled by the one-dimensional Helmholtz equation. First, the boundary value problem is written as a first order system of differential equations, and variational formulations for the LSFEM and MGFEM are derived. Then, by using appropriate basis functions, the stiffness matrices and load vectors which define the corresponding linear algebraic systems are obtained. In all cases, the stiffness matrix is banded and for the LSFEM it is also Hermitian. Numerical tests show that all these methods have quadratic convergence to the exact solution. However, their efficiency assessed in terms of the number of nodes and computing time required to reach quadratic convergence varies. It is observed that LSFEM requires many more nodes and employs much more time than MGFEM and IFDM to reach the quadratic convergence for high frequencies. It is also found that MGFEM has less numerical dispersion and, as a consequence, performs better than IFDM and LSFEM for high frequencies. (© 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim)</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Numerical Analysis & Computational Mathematics\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"128-139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/anac.200310011\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Numerical Analysis & Computational Mathematics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anac.200310011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Numerical Analysis & Computational Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anac.200310011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

比较了最小二乘有限元法(LSFEM)、混合伽辽金有限元法(MGFEM)和隐式有限差分法(IFDM)在求解一维亥姆霍兹方程声散射问题时的性能。首先,将边值问题写成一阶微分方程组,推导出LSFEM和MGFEM的变分公式。然后,通过适当的基函数,得到定义相应线性代数系统的刚度矩阵和载荷向量。在所有情况下,刚度矩阵都是带状的,对于LSFEM,它也是厄米矩阵。数值试验表明,这些方法都具有二次收敛性。然而,根据节点数量和达到二次收敛所需的计算时间来评估它们的效率是不同的。在高频情况下,LSFEM比MGFEM和IFDM需要更多的节点和更长的时间才能达到二次收敛。MGFEM具有较小的数值色散,因此在高频率下比IFDM和LSFEM表现得更好。(©2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH &KGaA公司,Weinheim)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Least Squares FEM, Mixed Galerkin FEM and an Implicit FDM Applied to Acoustic Scattering

This paper compares the performances of a least squares finite element method (LSFEM), a mixed Galerkin finite element method (MGFEM), and an implicit finite difference method (IFDM), when they are applied to an acoustic scattering problem modelled by the one-dimensional Helmholtz equation. First, the boundary value problem is written as a first order system of differential equations, and variational formulations for the LSFEM and MGFEM are derived. Then, by using appropriate basis functions, the stiffness matrices and load vectors which define the corresponding linear algebraic systems are obtained. In all cases, the stiffness matrix is banded and for the LSFEM it is also Hermitian. Numerical tests show that all these methods have quadratic convergence to the exact solution. However, their efficiency assessed in terms of the number of nodes and computing time required to reach quadratic convergence varies. It is observed that LSFEM requires many more nodes and employs much more time than MGFEM and IFDM to reach the quadratic convergence for high frequencies. It is also found that MGFEM has less numerical dispersion and, as a consequence, performs better than IFDM and LSFEM for high frequencies. (© 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信