什么是运动机能学期刊?1：

Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology Pub Date : 2014-01-01 DOI:10.2466/03.CP.3.20

D. Knudson

{"title":"什么是运动机能学期刊?1：","authors":"D. Knudson","doi":"10.2466/03.CP.3.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper responds to the issues raised by Cardinal, Schary, and Kim (2014) regarding a recent study published in Comprehensive Psychology (Knudson, 2013a). The issues raised by Cardinal and coworkers are important and related to the misuse of bibliometrics like the impact factor, but are also consistent with the data and interpretation in the Knudson (2013a) article. Both these articles correctly point out problems with the misuse of bibliometric variables in evaluating journals and the adverse consequences this has for research in Kinesiology and other fields. More research documenting the limitations and appropriate use of bibliometrics in evaluating Kinesiology-related journals, integrated with surveys of scholars defining the field of Kinesiology and its journals, are important solutions to the problems of Kinesiology identity and impact factor obsession.","PeriodicalId":37202,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is a Kinesiology Journal?1:\",\"authors\":\"D. Knudson\",\"doi\":\"10.2466/03.CP.3.20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper responds to the issues raised by Cardinal, Schary, and Kim (2014) regarding a recent study published in Comprehensive Psychology (Knudson, 2013a). The issues raised by Cardinal and coworkers are important and related to the misuse of bibliometrics like the impact factor, but are also consistent with the data and interpretation in the Knudson (2013a) article. Both these articles correctly point out problems with the misuse of bibliometric variables in evaluating journals and the adverse consequences this has for research in Kinesiology and other fields. More research documenting the limitations and appropriate use of bibliometrics in evaluating Kinesiology-related journals, integrated with surveys of scholars defining the field of Kinesiology and its journals, are important solutions to the problems of Kinesiology identity and impact factor obsession.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2466/03.CP.3.20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2466/03.CP.3.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

本文回应了Cardinal, Schary, and Kim(2014)对最近发表在《综合心理学》(Comprehensive Psychology)上的一项研究提出的问题(Knudson, 2013)。Cardinal和同事提出的问题很重要，与影响因子等文献计量学的滥用有关，但也与Knudson (2013a)文章中的数据和解释一致。这两篇文章都正确地指出了在评估期刊时误用文献计量变量的问题，以及这对运动机能学和其他领域的研究造成的不良后果。更多关于文献计量学在评估运动机能学相关期刊中的局限性和适当使用的研究，以及对定义运动机能学领域及其期刊的学者的调查，是解决运动机能学认同和影响因子困扰问题的重要方法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

What is a Kinesiology Journal?1:

Abstract This paper responds to the issues raised by Cardinal, Schary, and Kim (2014) regarding a recent study published in Comprehensive Psychology (Knudson, 2013a). The issues raised by Cardinal and coworkers are important and related to the misuse of bibliometrics like the impact factor, but are also consistent with the data and interpretation in the Knudson (2013a) article. Both these articles correctly point out problems with the misuse of bibliometric variables in evaluating journals and the adverse consequences this has for research in Kinesiology and other fields. More research documenting the limitations and appropriate use of bibliometrics in evaluating Kinesiology-related journals, integrated with surveys of scholars defining the field of Kinesiology and its journals, are important solutions to the problems of Kinesiology identity and impact factor obsession.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology Psychology-Social Psychology

CiteScore

3.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量