编辑距离不能在强次二次时间内计算(除非SETH为假)

A. Backurs, P. Indyk
{"title":"编辑距离不能在强次二次时间内计算(除非SETH为假)","authors":"A. Backurs, P. Indyk","doi":"10.1145/2746539.2746612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The edit distance (a.k.a. the Levenshtein distance) between two strings is defined as the minimum number of insertions, deletions or substitutions of symbols needed to transform one string into another. The problem of computing the edit distance between two strings is a classical computational task, with a well-known algorithm based on dynamic programming. Unfortunately, all known algorithms for this problem run in nearly quadratic time. In this paper we provide evidence that the near-quadratic running time bounds known for the problem of computing edit distance might be {tight}. Specifically, we show that, if the edit distance can be computed in time O(n2-δ) for some constant δ>0, then the satisfiability of conjunctive normal form formulas with N variables and M clauses can be solved in time MO(1) 2(1-ε)N for a constant ε>0. The latter result would violate the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis, which postulates that such algorithms do not exist.","PeriodicalId":20566,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the forty-seventh annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"379","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Edit Distance Cannot Be Computed in Strongly Subquadratic Time (unless SETH is false)\",\"authors\":\"A. Backurs, P. Indyk\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2746539.2746612\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The edit distance (a.k.a. the Levenshtein distance) between two strings is defined as the minimum number of insertions, deletions or substitutions of symbols needed to transform one string into another. The problem of computing the edit distance between two strings is a classical computational task, with a well-known algorithm based on dynamic programming. Unfortunately, all known algorithms for this problem run in nearly quadratic time. In this paper we provide evidence that the near-quadratic running time bounds known for the problem of computing edit distance might be {tight}. Specifically, we show that, if the edit distance can be computed in time O(n2-δ) for some constant δ>0, then the satisfiability of conjunctive normal form formulas with N variables and M clauses can be solved in time MO(1) 2(1-ε)N for a constant ε>0. The latter result would violate the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis, which postulates that such algorithms do not exist.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the forty-seventh annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"379\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the forty-seventh annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2746539.2746612\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the forty-seventh annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2746539.2746612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 379

摘要

两个字符串之间的编辑距离(又称Levenshtein距离)定义为将一个字符串转换为另一个字符串所需的符号插入、删除或替换的最小数量。计算两个字符串之间的编辑距离问题是一个经典的计算任务,采用了一种著名的基于动态规划的算法。不幸的是,所有已知的解决这个问题的算法都在接近二次的时间内运行。在本文中,我们提供的证据表明,已知的计算编辑距离问题的近二次运行时间界限可能是{紧}的。具体地说,我们证明了如果对于某个常数δ>0,编辑距离可以在O(n2-δ)时间内计算,那么对于一个常数ε>0,具有N个变量和M个子句的合取范式公式的可满足性可以在MO(1) 2(1-ε)N时间内求解。后一种结果将违反强指数时间假设,该假设假定这种算法不存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Edit Distance Cannot Be Computed in Strongly Subquadratic Time (unless SETH is false)
The edit distance (a.k.a. the Levenshtein distance) between two strings is defined as the minimum number of insertions, deletions or substitutions of symbols needed to transform one string into another. The problem of computing the edit distance between two strings is a classical computational task, with a well-known algorithm based on dynamic programming. Unfortunately, all known algorithms for this problem run in nearly quadratic time. In this paper we provide evidence that the near-quadratic running time bounds known for the problem of computing edit distance might be {tight}. Specifically, we show that, if the edit distance can be computed in time O(n2-δ) for some constant δ>0, then the satisfiability of conjunctive normal form formulas with N variables and M clauses can be solved in time MO(1) 2(1-ε)N for a constant ε>0. The latter result would violate the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis, which postulates that such algorithms do not exist.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信