大流行期间饮酒动机的检查:饮酒动机在冲动和酒精使用之间关系中的中介作用

IF 1.3 Q4 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
L. Dinc, Jemma Marzetti
{"title":"大流行期间饮酒动机的检查:饮酒动机在冲动和酒精使用之间关系中的中介作用","authors":"L. Dinc, Jemma Marzetti","doi":"10.1108/dhs-03-2022-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nPrevious research have shown that individuals with high trait impulsivity are at high risk of engaging in problem alcohol use and that drinking motives differentially predicted alcohol use and problems. This study aimed to investigate whether these previously shown associations still existed during the global outbreak of the pandemic, COVID-19, which resulted in a long period of lockdown and raised concerns about the effects of alcohol.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe data was collected from 185 adults between ages of 18 and 35 during the lockdown period (November 20–May 21) through an online survey. Participants completed an impulsivity questionnaire, drinking motives and alcohol use measures.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results revealed that enhancement and coping motives mediated the effects of positive and negative urgency, respectively, and lack of premeditation facet of impulsivity was directly linked to alcohol use. These findings are partially in line with the previous studies before the lockdown.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nOverall, individuals with particularly high urgency and premeditation maybe at high risk for problem alcohol use and may require tailored support for regulating emotions, particularly during stressful life events such as a global pandemic.\n\n\nPractical implications\nFindings may inform prevention and intervention strategies. Individuals with high trait urgency may benefit from more adaptive coping strategies such as learning specific emotion regulation strategies to minimise engaging in risk behaviours in stressful situations.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nFindings suggest that traits positive and negative urgency are risk factors for alcohol use through enhancement and coping motives respectively, and these associations are particularly strong during stressful life events.\n","PeriodicalId":72849,"journal":{"name":"Drugs, habits and social policy","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examination of drinking motives during the pandemic: mediating effects of drinking motives in the relationship between impulsivity and alcohol use\",\"authors\":\"L. Dinc, Jemma Marzetti\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/dhs-03-2022-0014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nPrevious research have shown that individuals with high trait impulsivity are at high risk of engaging in problem alcohol use and that drinking motives differentially predicted alcohol use and problems. This study aimed to investigate whether these previously shown associations still existed during the global outbreak of the pandemic, COVID-19, which resulted in a long period of lockdown and raised concerns about the effects of alcohol.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe data was collected from 185 adults between ages of 18 and 35 during the lockdown period (November 20–May 21) through an online survey. Participants completed an impulsivity questionnaire, drinking motives and alcohol use measures.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe results revealed that enhancement and coping motives mediated the effects of positive and negative urgency, respectively, and lack of premeditation facet of impulsivity was directly linked to alcohol use. These findings are partially in line with the previous studies before the lockdown.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nOverall, individuals with particularly high urgency and premeditation maybe at high risk for problem alcohol use and may require tailored support for regulating emotions, particularly during stressful life events such as a global pandemic.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nFindings may inform prevention and intervention strategies. Individuals with high trait urgency may benefit from more adaptive coping strategies such as learning specific emotion regulation strategies to minimise engaging in risk behaviours in stressful situations.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nFindings suggest that traits positive and negative urgency are risk factors for alcohol use through enhancement and coping motives respectively, and these associations are particularly strong during stressful life events.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":72849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drugs, habits and social policy\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drugs, habits and social policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/dhs-03-2022-0014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs, habits and social policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dhs-03-2022-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的以往的研究表明,高特质冲动性的个体有较高的问题酒精使用风险,饮酒动机对酒精使用和问题的预测存在差异。这项研究旨在调查这些先前显示的关联在全球大流行COVID-19爆发期间是否仍然存在,这导致了长时间的封锁,并引发了对酒精影响的担忧。设计/方法/方法通过在线调查收集了封锁期间(11月20日至5月21日)185名18至35岁的成年人的数据。参与者完成了冲动调查问卷、饮酒动机和酒精使用测量。研究结果表明,增强动机和应对动机分别介导了积极和消极紧迫性的影响,而冲动中缺乏预先考虑的方面与酒精使用直接相关。这些发现与封锁前的研究结果部分一致。总体而言,具有特别高度紧迫感和预谋的个人可能存在问题酒精使用的高风险,可能需要量身定制的情绪调节支持,特别是在全球大流行等压力生活事件期间。研究结果可能为预防和干预策略提供信息。具有高特质急迫性的个体可能受益于更具适应性的应对策略,例如学习特定的情绪调节策略,以最大限度地减少在压力情况下的风险行为。独创性/价值研究结果表明,积极和消极的紧迫性特征分别通过增强动机和应对动机成为酒精使用的危险因素,并且这些关联在压力生活事件中尤为强烈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examination of drinking motives during the pandemic: mediating effects of drinking motives in the relationship between impulsivity and alcohol use
Purpose Previous research have shown that individuals with high trait impulsivity are at high risk of engaging in problem alcohol use and that drinking motives differentially predicted alcohol use and problems. This study aimed to investigate whether these previously shown associations still existed during the global outbreak of the pandemic, COVID-19, which resulted in a long period of lockdown and raised concerns about the effects of alcohol. Design/methodology/approach The data was collected from 185 adults between ages of 18 and 35 during the lockdown period (November 20–May 21) through an online survey. Participants completed an impulsivity questionnaire, drinking motives and alcohol use measures. Findings The results revealed that enhancement and coping motives mediated the effects of positive and negative urgency, respectively, and lack of premeditation facet of impulsivity was directly linked to alcohol use. These findings are partially in line with the previous studies before the lockdown. Research limitations/implications Overall, individuals with particularly high urgency and premeditation maybe at high risk for problem alcohol use and may require tailored support for regulating emotions, particularly during stressful life events such as a global pandemic. Practical implications Findings may inform prevention and intervention strategies. Individuals with high trait urgency may benefit from more adaptive coping strategies such as learning specific emotion regulation strategies to minimise engaging in risk behaviours in stressful situations. Originality/value Findings suggest that traits positive and negative urgency are risk factors for alcohol use through enhancement and coping motives respectively, and these associations are particularly strong during stressful life events.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信