{"title":"评估从流离失所时代的迁移营地和文化景观,1930-1945","authors":"A. Madsen, Carrie Chasteen","doi":"10.1080/14660466.2019.1633835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The 1930s was a time of strife, uncertainty, and movement in the United States. As a result of the Great Depression and Dust Bowl, impromptu communities – both lasting and fleeting – seemingly appeared overnight in much of the country’s western and southwestern regions. Increased demand for housing forced the government to fund migratory camps for the destitute. Although some settlements were ephemeral and abandoned after this age of displacement, others continue to retain their integrity and convey their significance today. These camps stand as testaments to the thousands of migrants who sought refuge in their shelters and communities during an epoch of increased individualism. Using two Farm Security Administration (FSA) camps as case studies, this paper examines the history of the Dust Bowl migration, the proliferation of migratory camps, and the nuances of their potential eligibility. Arvin Federal Migratory Labor Camp retains integrity, conveys its significance, and has been listed in the National Register of Historic Places and California Register of Historical Resources. Contrastingly, Shafter Federal Migratory Camp has been dramatically altered over the last eight decades. The only remnants of this camp are the concrete foundations alluding to a double-hexagonal plan. The different conditions of these camps evidence the need for preservation stewardship.","PeriodicalId":45250,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Practice","volume":"117 1","pages":"121 - 131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating migratory camps and cultural landscapes from the age of displacement, 1930–1945\",\"authors\":\"A. Madsen, Carrie Chasteen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14660466.2019.1633835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The 1930s was a time of strife, uncertainty, and movement in the United States. As a result of the Great Depression and Dust Bowl, impromptu communities – both lasting and fleeting – seemingly appeared overnight in much of the country’s western and southwestern regions. Increased demand for housing forced the government to fund migratory camps for the destitute. Although some settlements were ephemeral and abandoned after this age of displacement, others continue to retain their integrity and convey their significance today. These camps stand as testaments to the thousands of migrants who sought refuge in their shelters and communities during an epoch of increased individualism. Using two Farm Security Administration (FSA) camps as case studies, this paper examines the history of the Dust Bowl migration, the proliferation of migratory camps, and the nuances of their potential eligibility. Arvin Federal Migratory Labor Camp retains integrity, conveys its significance, and has been listed in the National Register of Historic Places and California Register of Historical Resources. Contrastingly, Shafter Federal Migratory Camp has been dramatically altered over the last eight decades. The only remnants of this camp are the concrete foundations alluding to a double-hexagonal plan. The different conditions of these camps evidence the need for preservation stewardship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Practice\",\"volume\":\"117 1\",\"pages\":\"121 - 131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14660466.2019.1633835\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14660466.2019.1633835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating migratory camps and cultural landscapes from the age of displacement, 1930–1945
ABSTRACT The 1930s was a time of strife, uncertainty, and movement in the United States. As a result of the Great Depression and Dust Bowl, impromptu communities – both lasting and fleeting – seemingly appeared overnight in much of the country’s western and southwestern regions. Increased demand for housing forced the government to fund migratory camps for the destitute. Although some settlements were ephemeral and abandoned after this age of displacement, others continue to retain their integrity and convey their significance today. These camps stand as testaments to the thousands of migrants who sought refuge in their shelters and communities during an epoch of increased individualism. Using two Farm Security Administration (FSA) camps as case studies, this paper examines the history of the Dust Bowl migration, the proliferation of migratory camps, and the nuances of their potential eligibility. Arvin Federal Migratory Labor Camp retains integrity, conveys its significance, and has been listed in the National Register of Historic Places and California Register of Historical Resources. Contrastingly, Shafter Federal Migratory Camp has been dramatically altered over the last eight decades. The only remnants of this camp are the concrete foundations alluding to a double-hexagonal plan. The different conditions of these camps evidence the need for preservation stewardship.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Practice provides a multidisciplinary forum for authoritative discussion and analysis of issues of wide interest to the international community of environmental professionals, with the intent of developing innovative solutions to environmental problems for public policy implementation, professional practice, or both. Peer-reviewed original research papers, environmental reviews, and commentaries, along with news articles, book reviews, and points of view, link findings in science and technology with issues of public policy, health, environmental quality, law, political economy, management, and the appropriate standards for expertise. Published for the National Association of Environmental Professionals