评估从流离失所时代的迁移营地和文化景观,1930-1945

Q3 Social Sciences
A. Madsen, Carrie Chasteen
{"title":"评估从流离失所时代的迁移营地和文化景观,1930-1945","authors":"A. Madsen, Carrie Chasteen","doi":"10.1080/14660466.2019.1633835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The 1930s was a time of strife, uncertainty, and movement in the United States. As a result of the Great Depression and Dust Bowl, impromptu communities – both lasting and fleeting – seemingly appeared overnight in much of the country’s western and southwestern regions. Increased demand for housing forced the government to fund migratory camps for the destitute. Although some settlements were ephemeral and abandoned after this age of displacement, others continue to retain their integrity and convey their significance today. These camps stand as testaments to the thousands of migrants who sought refuge in their shelters and communities during an epoch of increased individualism. Using two Farm Security Administration (FSA) camps as case studies, this paper examines the history of the Dust Bowl migration, the proliferation of migratory camps, and the nuances of their potential eligibility. Arvin Federal Migratory Labor Camp retains integrity, conveys its significance, and has been listed in the National Register of Historic Places and California Register of Historical Resources. Contrastingly, Shafter Federal Migratory Camp has been dramatically altered over the last eight decades. The only remnants of this camp are the concrete foundations alluding to a double-hexagonal plan. The different conditions of these camps evidence the need for preservation stewardship.","PeriodicalId":45250,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Practice","volume":"117 1","pages":"121 - 131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating migratory camps and cultural landscapes from the age of displacement, 1930–1945\",\"authors\":\"A. Madsen, Carrie Chasteen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14660466.2019.1633835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The 1930s was a time of strife, uncertainty, and movement in the United States. As a result of the Great Depression and Dust Bowl, impromptu communities – both lasting and fleeting – seemingly appeared overnight in much of the country’s western and southwestern regions. Increased demand for housing forced the government to fund migratory camps for the destitute. Although some settlements were ephemeral and abandoned after this age of displacement, others continue to retain their integrity and convey their significance today. These camps stand as testaments to the thousands of migrants who sought refuge in their shelters and communities during an epoch of increased individualism. Using two Farm Security Administration (FSA) camps as case studies, this paper examines the history of the Dust Bowl migration, the proliferation of migratory camps, and the nuances of their potential eligibility. Arvin Federal Migratory Labor Camp retains integrity, conveys its significance, and has been listed in the National Register of Historic Places and California Register of Historical Resources. Contrastingly, Shafter Federal Migratory Camp has been dramatically altered over the last eight decades. The only remnants of this camp are the concrete foundations alluding to a double-hexagonal plan. The different conditions of these camps evidence the need for preservation stewardship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Practice\",\"volume\":\"117 1\",\"pages\":\"121 - 131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14660466.2019.1633835\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14660466.2019.1633835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

20世纪30年代是美国一个充满冲突、不确定性和运动的时期。由于大萧条和沙尘暴的影响,临时社区——无论是持久的还是短暂的——似乎一夜之间在美国西部和西南地区出现了。住房需求的增加迫使政府为贫困人口的迁移营地提供资金。虽然有些定居点是短暂的,在这一流离失所的时代之后被遗弃,但其他定居点继续保持其完整性,并在今天传达其意义。这些营地是成千上万的移民在个人主义日益抬头的时代在他们的避难所和社区寻求庇护的见证。本文以两个农场安全管理局(FSA)营地作为案例研究,考察了沙尘暴迁移的历史,迁移营地的扩散,以及他们潜在资格的细微差别。阿尔文联邦移民劳动营保持了完整性,传达了它的重要性,并已被列入国家史迹名录和加州历史资源名录。相比之下,谢夫特联邦移民营在过去的八十年里发生了巨大的变化。这个营地唯一的遗迹是混凝土基础,暗示了一个双六角形的计划。这些营地的不同条件证明了保护管理的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating migratory camps and cultural landscapes from the age of displacement, 1930–1945
ABSTRACT The 1930s was a time of strife, uncertainty, and movement in the United States. As a result of the Great Depression and Dust Bowl, impromptu communities – both lasting and fleeting – seemingly appeared overnight in much of the country’s western and southwestern regions. Increased demand for housing forced the government to fund migratory camps for the destitute. Although some settlements were ephemeral and abandoned after this age of displacement, others continue to retain their integrity and convey their significance today. These camps stand as testaments to the thousands of migrants who sought refuge in their shelters and communities during an epoch of increased individualism. Using two Farm Security Administration (FSA) camps as case studies, this paper examines the history of the Dust Bowl migration, the proliferation of migratory camps, and the nuances of their potential eligibility. Arvin Federal Migratory Labor Camp retains integrity, conveys its significance, and has been listed in the National Register of Historic Places and California Register of Historical Resources. Contrastingly, Shafter Federal Migratory Camp has been dramatically altered over the last eight decades. The only remnants of this camp are the concrete foundations alluding to a double-hexagonal plan. The different conditions of these camps evidence the need for preservation stewardship.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Practice
Environmental Practice ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Environmental Practice provides a multidisciplinary forum for authoritative discussion and analysis of issues of wide interest to the international community of environmental professionals, with the intent of developing innovative solutions to environmental problems for public policy implementation, professional practice, or both. Peer-reviewed original research papers, environmental reviews, and commentaries, along with news articles, book reviews, and points of view, link findings in science and technology with issues of public policy, health, environmental quality, law, political economy, management, and the appropriate standards for expertise. Published for the National Association of Environmental Professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信