加纳南部花生(Arachis hypogaea L.)杂草和病害管理实践的经济回报

S. Arthur, G. Bolfrey-Arku, J. Sarkodie-Addo, R. Akroma, M. Mochiah, D. D. Jordan, R. Brandenburg, G. MacDonald, A. Dankyi, B. Bravo-Ureta, D. Hoisington, J. Rhoads
{"title":"加纳南部花生(Arachis hypogaea L.)杂草和病害管理实践的经济回报","authors":"S. Arthur, G. Bolfrey-Arku, J. Sarkodie-Addo, R. Akroma, M. Mochiah, D. D. Jordan, R. Brandenburg, G. MacDonald, A. Dankyi, B. Bravo-Ureta, D. Hoisington, J. Rhoads","doi":"10.3146/0095-3679-491-ps21-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) yield and financial return can be negatively affected by weeds and the combination of early leaf spot disease [ Passalora arachidicola (Hori) U. Braun] and late leaf spot disease [ Nothopassalora personata (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) U. Braun, C. Nakash., Videira & Crous] in Ghana. Research was conducted in southern Ghana to evaluate hand-weeding, herbicide applied preemergence (PRE) or herbicide applied postemergence (POST), a combination of PRE and POST herbicides, and PRE or POST herbicides supplemented with hand-weeding and disease management practices (i.e., no fungicide or a two sequential fungicide applications 45 and 60 days after planting). Although some differences in leaf spot severity were observed based on weed management, peanut pod yield and financial return based on yield and cost of pest management practices were affected by weed management and disease management practices individually but not the interaction of these treatment factors. The weed management practices with the highest financial return included a POST herbicide with or without hand weeding and a PRE herbicide followed by hand-weeding or a POST herbicide.","PeriodicalId":19823,"journal":{"name":"Peanut Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Financial Return from Weed and Disease Management Practices in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Southern Ghana\",\"authors\":\"S. Arthur, G. Bolfrey-Arku, J. Sarkodie-Addo, R. Akroma, M. Mochiah, D. D. Jordan, R. Brandenburg, G. MacDonald, A. Dankyi, B. Bravo-Ureta, D. Hoisington, J. Rhoads\",\"doi\":\"10.3146/0095-3679-491-ps21-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) yield and financial return can be negatively affected by weeds and the combination of early leaf spot disease [ Passalora arachidicola (Hori) U. Braun] and late leaf spot disease [ Nothopassalora personata (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) U. Braun, C. Nakash., Videira & Crous] in Ghana. Research was conducted in southern Ghana to evaluate hand-weeding, herbicide applied preemergence (PRE) or herbicide applied postemergence (POST), a combination of PRE and POST herbicides, and PRE or POST herbicides supplemented with hand-weeding and disease management practices (i.e., no fungicide or a two sequential fungicide applications 45 and 60 days after planting). Although some differences in leaf spot severity were observed based on weed management, peanut pod yield and financial return based on yield and cost of pest management practices were affected by weed management and disease management practices individually but not the interaction of these treatment factors. The weed management practices with the highest financial return included a POST herbicide with or without hand weeding and a PRE herbicide followed by hand-weeding or a POST herbicide.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Peanut Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Peanut Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3146/0095-3679-491-ps21-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peanut Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3146/0095-3679-491-ps21-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

杂草和早期叶斑病[Passalora arachidicola (Hori) U. Braun]和晚期叶斑病[Nothopassalora personata (Berk.)]的组合会对花生(arachhis hypogaea L.)的产量和经济回报产生负面影响。U.布劳恩,C.纳卡什。(在加纳的Videira & Crous)。在加纳南部进行了研究,以评估手工除草、出苗前施用除草剂(PRE)或出苗后施用除草剂(POST)、前除草剂和后除草剂联合使用,以及前除草剂或后除草剂辅以手工除草和病害管理措施(即不施用杀菌剂或在种植后45天和60天连续两次施用杀菌剂)。尽管不同杂草管理方式在叶斑病严重程度上存在一定差异,但花生豆荚产量和以病虫害管理方式的产量和成本为基础的经济回报仅受杂草管理和病害管理方式的单独影响,而不受这些处理因素的相互作用影响。具有最高经济回报的杂草管理措施包括:先使用后除草,再使用手除草或不使用手除草;先使用前除草,再使用手除草或后使用除草剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Financial Return from Weed and Disease Management Practices in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Southern Ghana
Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) yield and financial return can be negatively affected by weeds and the combination of early leaf spot disease [ Passalora arachidicola (Hori) U. Braun] and late leaf spot disease [ Nothopassalora personata (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) U. Braun, C. Nakash., Videira & Crous] in Ghana. Research was conducted in southern Ghana to evaluate hand-weeding, herbicide applied preemergence (PRE) or herbicide applied postemergence (POST), a combination of PRE and POST herbicides, and PRE or POST herbicides supplemented with hand-weeding and disease management practices (i.e., no fungicide or a two sequential fungicide applications 45 and 60 days after planting). Although some differences in leaf spot severity were observed based on weed management, peanut pod yield and financial return based on yield and cost of pest management practices were affected by weed management and disease management practices individually but not the interaction of these treatment factors. The weed management practices with the highest financial return included a POST herbicide with or without hand weeding and a PRE herbicide followed by hand-weeding or a POST herbicide.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信