O. Suwarsa, F. A. Khairani, Syawalika Ulya Isneny, E. Avriyanti, H. Dharmadji, Miranti Pangastuti, E. Sutedja, H. Gunawan
{"title":"甲氨蝶呤和环孢素联合治疗印度尼西亚万隆寻常型银屑病患者的效果","authors":"O. Suwarsa, F. A. Khairani, Syawalika Ulya Isneny, E. Avriyanti, H. Dharmadji, Miranti Pangastuti, E. Sutedja, H. Gunawan","doi":"10.20473/bikk.v33.3.2021.200-204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Methotrexate (MTX) and cyclosporine have been used as effective systemic mono-therapy for psoriasis. Several factors are considered to switch monotherapy to combination therapy because monotherapy is no longer effective and has higher side effects. Hence,clinicians have avoided systemic therapy combinations due to its toxicity. However, some studies showed that this combination therapy could be usedeffectively for psoriasis patients. Purpose: This study aimed to analyze the efficacy and adverse effects of systemic MTX and cyclosporine combination therapy in Indonesian psoriasis vulgaris patients. Methods: The retrospective study assessed the effectiveness of 3 monthsmono-therapyand combination therapy of systemic MTX and cyclosporine in psoriasisvulgaris patients from 2016–2017 in Dermatology Clinic, Dr. Hasan Sadikin Hospital, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia. Result: Psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score 90 were achieved in the group MTX (50%) and cyclosporine group (50%), while none in the combination group.However, eight patients (50%) in group MTX and cyclosporine reached the primary endpoint of PASI 50. One patient in cyclosporine group had adverse effects on kidney profiles. Nonetheless, other patients had no biochemical changes. But, there was no significant difference in the change of PASI between each group (p=0.102). Conclusion: We propose that combination therapy of MTX and cyclosporine is relatively safe and efficacious in treating Indonesian psoriasis vulgaris patients. This combination treatment isas effective as MTX or cyclosporinemono-therapy.","PeriodicalId":8792,"journal":{"name":"Berkala Ilmu Kesehatan Kulit dan Kelamin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Systemic Methotrexate and Cyclosporine Combination Therapy inPsoriasis Vulgaris Patients in Bandung, Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"O. Suwarsa, F. A. Khairani, Syawalika Ulya Isneny, E. Avriyanti, H. Dharmadji, Miranti Pangastuti, E. Sutedja, H. Gunawan\",\"doi\":\"10.20473/bikk.v33.3.2021.200-204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Methotrexate (MTX) and cyclosporine have been used as effective systemic mono-therapy for psoriasis. Several factors are considered to switch monotherapy to combination therapy because monotherapy is no longer effective and has higher side effects. Hence,clinicians have avoided systemic therapy combinations due to its toxicity. However, some studies showed that this combination therapy could be usedeffectively for psoriasis patients. Purpose: This study aimed to analyze the efficacy and adverse effects of systemic MTX and cyclosporine combination therapy in Indonesian psoriasis vulgaris patients. Methods: The retrospective study assessed the effectiveness of 3 monthsmono-therapyand combination therapy of systemic MTX and cyclosporine in psoriasisvulgaris patients from 2016–2017 in Dermatology Clinic, Dr. Hasan Sadikin Hospital, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia. Result: Psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score 90 were achieved in the group MTX (50%) and cyclosporine group (50%), while none in the combination group.However, eight patients (50%) in group MTX and cyclosporine reached the primary endpoint of PASI 50. One patient in cyclosporine group had adverse effects on kidney profiles. Nonetheless, other patients had no biochemical changes. But, there was no significant difference in the change of PASI between each group (p=0.102). Conclusion: We propose that combination therapy of MTX and cyclosporine is relatively safe and efficacious in treating Indonesian psoriasis vulgaris patients. This combination treatment isas effective as MTX or cyclosporinemono-therapy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Berkala Ilmu Kesehatan Kulit dan Kelamin\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Berkala Ilmu Kesehatan Kulit dan Kelamin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20473/bikk.v33.3.2021.200-204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkala Ilmu Kesehatan Kulit dan Kelamin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/bikk.v33.3.2021.200-204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
背景:甲氨蝶呤(MTX)和环孢素已被用作治疗银屑病的有效系统性单一疗法。由于单一疗法不再有效且副作用更高,因此将单一疗法转换为联合疗法需要考虑几个因素。因此,临床医生因其毒性而避免全身联合治疗。然而,一些研究表明,这种联合治疗可以有效地用于牛皮癣患者。目的:分析甲氨蝶呤联合环孢素治疗印尼寻常型银屑病的疗效及不良反应。方法:回顾性研究评估印度尼西亚西爪哇万隆Dr. Hasan Sadikin医院皮肤科诊所2016-2017年3个月系统性MTX和环孢素联合治疗寻常型银屑病患者的疗效。结果:甲氨蝶呤组(50%)和环孢素组(50%)患者的银屑病面积和严重程度指数(PASI)均达到90分,联合用药组均无。然而,MTX和环孢素组有8例患者(50%)达到了PASI 50的主要终点。环孢素组1例患者出现肾侧不良反应。然而,其他患者没有生化变化。但两组间PASI变化差异无统计学意义(p=0.102)。结论:甲氨蝶呤联合环孢素治疗印尼寻常型银屑病是一种相对安全有效的治疗方法。这种联合治疗与甲氨蝶呤或环孢素治疗一样有效。
The Effect of Systemic Methotrexate and Cyclosporine Combination Therapy inPsoriasis Vulgaris Patients in Bandung, Indonesia
Background: Methotrexate (MTX) and cyclosporine have been used as effective systemic mono-therapy for psoriasis. Several factors are considered to switch monotherapy to combination therapy because monotherapy is no longer effective and has higher side effects. Hence,clinicians have avoided systemic therapy combinations due to its toxicity. However, some studies showed that this combination therapy could be usedeffectively for psoriasis patients. Purpose: This study aimed to analyze the efficacy and adverse effects of systemic MTX and cyclosporine combination therapy in Indonesian psoriasis vulgaris patients. Methods: The retrospective study assessed the effectiveness of 3 monthsmono-therapyand combination therapy of systemic MTX and cyclosporine in psoriasisvulgaris patients from 2016–2017 in Dermatology Clinic, Dr. Hasan Sadikin Hospital, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia. Result: Psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score 90 were achieved in the group MTX (50%) and cyclosporine group (50%), while none in the combination group.However, eight patients (50%) in group MTX and cyclosporine reached the primary endpoint of PASI 50. One patient in cyclosporine group had adverse effects on kidney profiles. Nonetheless, other patients had no biochemical changes. But, there was no significant difference in the change of PASI between each group (p=0.102). Conclusion: We propose that combination therapy of MTX and cyclosporine is relatively safe and efficacious in treating Indonesian psoriasis vulgaris patients. This combination treatment isas effective as MTX or cyclosporinemono-therapy.