脑动静脉畸形血管内治疗的风险

A. Hartmann, J. Pile-Spellman, C. Stapf, R. Sciacca, A. Faulstich, J. Mohr, H. Schumacher, H. Mast
{"title":"脑动静脉畸形血管内治疗的风险","authors":"A. Hartmann, J. Pile-Spellman, C. Stapf, R. Sciacca, A. Faulstich, J. Mohr, H. Schumacher, H. Mast","doi":"10.1161/01.STR.0000020123.80940.B2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Purpose— Independently assessed data on frequency, severity, and determinants of neurological deficits after endovascular treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are scarce. Methods— From the prospective Columbia AVM Study Project, 233 consecutive patients with brain AVM receiving ≥1 endovascular treatments were analyzed. Neurological impairment was assessed by a neurologist using the Rankin Scale before and after completed endovascular therapy. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify demographic, clinical, and morphological predictors of treatment-related neurological deficits. The analysis included the components used in the Spetzler-Martin risk score for AVM surgery (AVM size, venous drainage pattern, and eloquence of AVM location). Results— The 233 patients were treated with 545 endovascular procedures. Mean follow-up time was 9.6 months (SD, 18.1 months). Two hundred patients (86%) experienced no change in neurological status after treatment, and 33 patients (14%) showed treatment-related neurological deficits. Of the latter, 5 (2%) had persistent disabling deficits (Rankin score >2), and 2 (1%) died. Increasing patient age [odds ratio (OR), 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01 to 1.08], number of embolizations (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.70), and absence of a pretreatment neurological deficit (OR, 4.55; 95% CI, 1.03 to 20.0) were associated with new neurological deficits. None of the morphological AVM characteristics tested predicted treatment complications. Conclusions— From independent neurological assessment and prospective data collection, our findings suggest a low rate of disabling treatment complications in this center for endovascular brain AVM treatment. Risk predictors for endovascular treatment differ from those for AVM surgery.","PeriodicalId":22274,"journal":{"name":"Stroke: Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":"23 1","pages":"1816-1820"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"206","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk of Endovascular Treatment of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations\",\"authors\":\"A. Hartmann, J. Pile-Spellman, C. Stapf, R. Sciacca, A. Faulstich, J. Mohr, H. Schumacher, H. Mast\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/01.STR.0000020123.80940.B2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Purpose— Independently assessed data on frequency, severity, and determinants of neurological deficits after endovascular treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are scarce. Methods— From the prospective Columbia AVM Study Project, 233 consecutive patients with brain AVM receiving ≥1 endovascular treatments were analyzed. Neurological impairment was assessed by a neurologist using the Rankin Scale before and after completed endovascular therapy. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify demographic, clinical, and morphological predictors of treatment-related neurological deficits. The analysis included the components used in the Spetzler-Martin risk score for AVM surgery (AVM size, venous drainage pattern, and eloquence of AVM location). Results— The 233 patients were treated with 545 endovascular procedures. Mean follow-up time was 9.6 months (SD, 18.1 months). Two hundred patients (86%) experienced no change in neurological status after treatment, and 33 patients (14%) showed treatment-related neurological deficits. Of the latter, 5 (2%) had persistent disabling deficits (Rankin score >2), and 2 (1%) died. Increasing patient age [odds ratio (OR), 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01 to 1.08], number of embolizations (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.70), and absence of a pretreatment neurological deficit (OR, 4.55; 95% CI, 1.03 to 20.0) were associated with new neurological deficits. None of the morphological AVM characteristics tested predicted treatment complications. Conclusions— From independent neurological assessment and prospective data collection, our findings suggest a low rate of disabling treatment complications in this center for endovascular brain AVM treatment. Risk predictors for endovascular treatment differ from those for AVM surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stroke: Journal of the American Heart Association\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"1816-1820\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"206\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stroke: Journal of the American Heart Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000020123.80940.B2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke: Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000020123.80940.B2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 206

摘要

背景和目的:关于脑动静脉畸形(AVMs)血管内治疗后神经功能缺损的频率、严重程度和决定因素的独立评估数据很少。方法:来自前瞻性哥伦比亚AVM研究项目,对233例连续接受≥1种血管内治疗的脑AVM患者进行分析。在完成血管内治疗前后,由神经科医生使用兰金量表评估神经功能损害。使用多变量逻辑回归模型来确定治疗相关神经功能障碍的人口学、临床和形态学预测因素。分析包括用于AVM手术的Spetzler-Martin风险评分的组成部分(AVM大小,静脉引流模式和AVM位置的清晰度)。结果:233例患者接受了545次血管内手术。平均随访时间9.6个月(SD, 18.1个月)。200名患者(86%)在治疗后神经状态没有改变,33名患者(14%)出现治疗相关的神经功能缺损。在后者中,5例(2%)有持续的残疾缺陷(Rankin评分>2),2例(1%)死亡。增加患者年龄[优势比(OR), 1.04;95%可信区间(CI, 1.01 ~ 1.08),栓塞次数(OR, 1.41;95% CI, 1.16 - 1.70),并且没有预处理神经功能缺陷(OR, 4.55;95% CI, 1.03 ~ 20.0)与新的神经功能障碍相关。AVM的形态学特征均不能预测治疗并发症。结论:通过独立的神经学评估和前瞻性数据收集,我们的研究结果表明,在该中心进行血管内脑动静脉畸形治疗的致残并发症发生率低。血管内治疗的风险预测因素不同于动静脉畸形手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk of Endovascular Treatment of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations
Background and Purpose— Independently assessed data on frequency, severity, and determinants of neurological deficits after endovascular treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are scarce. Methods— From the prospective Columbia AVM Study Project, 233 consecutive patients with brain AVM receiving ≥1 endovascular treatments were analyzed. Neurological impairment was assessed by a neurologist using the Rankin Scale before and after completed endovascular therapy. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify demographic, clinical, and morphological predictors of treatment-related neurological deficits. The analysis included the components used in the Spetzler-Martin risk score for AVM surgery (AVM size, venous drainage pattern, and eloquence of AVM location). Results— The 233 patients were treated with 545 endovascular procedures. Mean follow-up time was 9.6 months (SD, 18.1 months). Two hundred patients (86%) experienced no change in neurological status after treatment, and 33 patients (14%) showed treatment-related neurological deficits. Of the latter, 5 (2%) had persistent disabling deficits (Rankin score >2), and 2 (1%) died. Increasing patient age [odds ratio (OR), 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01 to 1.08], number of embolizations (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.70), and absence of a pretreatment neurological deficit (OR, 4.55; 95% CI, 1.03 to 20.0) were associated with new neurological deficits. None of the morphological AVM characteristics tested predicted treatment complications. Conclusions— From independent neurological assessment and prospective data collection, our findings suggest a low rate of disabling treatment complications in this center for endovascular brain AVM treatment. Risk predictors for endovascular treatment differ from those for AVM surgery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信