非常规技术克服窄缘固井:马来西亚Malikai深水项目案例研究

Yijing Hoe, Anh Duong, T. Heu, Mohd Razif Radzi
{"title":"非常规技术克服窄缘固井:马来西亚Malikai深水项目案例研究","authors":"Yijing Hoe, Anh Duong, T. Heu, Mohd Razif Radzi","doi":"10.2118/191953-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n As Malaysia’s first tension leg platform, the Shell Malikai project, represents an unconventional approach towards deepwater operation in this region. In a field embedded characterized by reservoir drawdown from adjacent production wells, the lowest cementing margin is 0.65 ppg. Annular gaps between casings of as tight as 0.53 in each side further elevates the equivalent circulating density (ECD). Cementing software simulation predicts risk of heavy losses during cement placement and subsequently lack of isolation between multiple hydrocarbon-bearing zones. The loss of zonal isolation would mean crossflow between the reservoir. At worst case, some of the water injector wells may be abandoned due to inability to inject into the target reservoir and uncertainties of injection efficiency. This represents a significant loss of capital investment. A two-pronged solution has been developed to secure the long-term well integrity of the deepwater project. Implementation involved front-end design, modelling, planning, and execution.\n Two-stage cementing is a technique by which selected intervals along the casing can be cemented in separate stages. It reduces the risk of losses due to long column of cement slurry exerting high hydrostatic head towards the weak formation. In 11 3/4in liner with tight annular gap, the risk of taking losses is high. Therefore, two-stage cementing was employed, combined with specialized blended lightweight 11.5-ppg cement. First-stage cement will provide good liner shoe strength for drilling ahead, and second-stage cement will provide zonal isolation for two hydrocarbon zones near the top of the liner. For 9 5/8in liner, due to the presence of a pressure ramp at the top of the section and weak formation at the bottom, managed pressure cementing (MPC) was the chosen approach to mitigate the risk of losses. MPC is a technique that enables cementation to be conducted in a hydrostatically underbalanced condition where surface backpressure (SBP) is applied to maintain the bottomhole pressure between the highest pore pressure and the lowest fracture pressure of the well.\n The combination of MPC and two-stage cementing, together with other existing best practices, formed an integrated solution in narrow margin cementing. This has resulted in flawless cementation for two water injector wells. No losses were observed during cement displacement, there was no gas migration, and the liner top packer was successfully set, and pressure tested in MPC mode. A subsequent cement log confirmed the top of cement requirement was fulfilled. The paper will further explain on how this unconventional technique were planned and executed.","PeriodicalId":11240,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Tue, October 23, 2018","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unconventional Techniques Overcome Narrow-Margin Cementing: Case Studies from Malikai Deepwater Project, Malaysia\",\"authors\":\"Yijing Hoe, Anh Duong, T. Heu, Mohd Razif Radzi\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/191953-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n As Malaysia’s first tension leg platform, the Shell Malikai project, represents an unconventional approach towards deepwater operation in this region. In a field embedded characterized by reservoir drawdown from adjacent production wells, the lowest cementing margin is 0.65 ppg. Annular gaps between casings of as tight as 0.53 in each side further elevates the equivalent circulating density (ECD). Cementing software simulation predicts risk of heavy losses during cement placement and subsequently lack of isolation between multiple hydrocarbon-bearing zones. The loss of zonal isolation would mean crossflow between the reservoir. At worst case, some of the water injector wells may be abandoned due to inability to inject into the target reservoir and uncertainties of injection efficiency. This represents a significant loss of capital investment. A two-pronged solution has been developed to secure the long-term well integrity of the deepwater project. Implementation involved front-end design, modelling, planning, and execution.\\n Two-stage cementing is a technique by which selected intervals along the casing can be cemented in separate stages. It reduces the risk of losses due to long column of cement slurry exerting high hydrostatic head towards the weak formation. In 11 3/4in liner with tight annular gap, the risk of taking losses is high. Therefore, two-stage cementing was employed, combined with specialized blended lightweight 11.5-ppg cement. First-stage cement will provide good liner shoe strength for drilling ahead, and second-stage cement will provide zonal isolation for two hydrocarbon zones near the top of the liner. For 9 5/8in liner, due to the presence of a pressure ramp at the top of the section and weak formation at the bottom, managed pressure cementing (MPC) was the chosen approach to mitigate the risk of losses. MPC is a technique that enables cementation to be conducted in a hydrostatically underbalanced condition where surface backpressure (SBP) is applied to maintain the bottomhole pressure between the highest pore pressure and the lowest fracture pressure of the well.\\n The combination of MPC and two-stage cementing, together with other existing best practices, formed an integrated solution in narrow margin cementing. This has resulted in flawless cementation for two water injector wells. No losses were observed during cement displacement, there was no gas migration, and the liner top packer was successfully set, and pressure tested in MPC mode. A subsequent cement log confirmed the top of cement requirement was fulfilled. The paper will further explain on how this unconventional technique were planned and executed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 1 Tue, October 23, 2018\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 1 Tue, October 23, 2018\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/191953-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Tue, October 23, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/191953-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

作为马来西亚首个张力腿平台,壳牌Malikai项目代表了该地区深水作业的非常规方法。在邻近生产井的油藏下降的情况下,最低的固井裕度为0.65 ppg。套管之间的环空间隙每侧紧密度可达0.53,进一步提高了等效循环密度(ECD)。固井软件模拟预测了在固井过程中严重漏失的风险,以及随后多个含油气层之间缺乏隔离。层间隔离的丧失将意味着储层之间的横流。在最坏的情况下,由于无法注入目标储层和注入效率的不确定性,一些注水井可能会被放弃。这意味着资本投资的重大损失。为了确保深水项目的长期油井完整性,开发了一种双管齐下的解决方案。实现涉及前端设计、建模、计划和执行。两段固井是一种沿套管选定段进行分段固井的技术。它降低了由于长柱水泥浆对脆弱地层施加高静水压头而造成的损失风险。在11 3/4英寸的尾管中,环空间隙很紧,漏失的风险很高。因此,采用了两级固井,并结合了11.5 ppg的专用轻质水泥。第一级固井将为后续钻井提供良好的尾管鞋强度,第二级固井将为尾管顶部附近的两个油气层提供层间隔离。对于9 - 5/8in尾管,由于上部存在压力坡道,底部地层较弱,因此选择控压固井(MPC)来降低漏失风险。MPC是一种能够在静水不平衡条件下进行固井的技术,在这种情况下,地面背压(SBP)可以使井底压力保持在最高孔隙压力和最低破裂压力之间。MPC和两级固井的结合,再加上其他现有的最佳实践,形成了窄缘固井的综合解决方案。这使得两口注水井的固井完美无缺。在顶替水泥过程中没有观察到漏失,没有气体运移,尾管顶部封隔器成功坐封,并在MPC模式下进行了压力测试。随后的水泥测井证实了水泥的最高要求。本文将进一步解释这种非常规技术是如何计划和执行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unconventional Techniques Overcome Narrow-Margin Cementing: Case Studies from Malikai Deepwater Project, Malaysia
As Malaysia’s first tension leg platform, the Shell Malikai project, represents an unconventional approach towards deepwater operation in this region. In a field embedded characterized by reservoir drawdown from adjacent production wells, the lowest cementing margin is 0.65 ppg. Annular gaps between casings of as tight as 0.53 in each side further elevates the equivalent circulating density (ECD). Cementing software simulation predicts risk of heavy losses during cement placement and subsequently lack of isolation between multiple hydrocarbon-bearing zones. The loss of zonal isolation would mean crossflow between the reservoir. At worst case, some of the water injector wells may be abandoned due to inability to inject into the target reservoir and uncertainties of injection efficiency. This represents a significant loss of capital investment. A two-pronged solution has been developed to secure the long-term well integrity of the deepwater project. Implementation involved front-end design, modelling, planning, and execution. Two-stage cementing is a technique by which selected intervals along the casing can be cemented in separate stages. It reduces the risk of losses due to long column of cement slurry exerting high hydrostatic head towards the weak formation. In 11 3/4in liner with tight annular gap, the risk of taking losses is high. Therefore, two-stage cementing was employed, combined with specialized blended lightweight 11.5-ppg cement. First-stage cement will provide good liner shoe strength for drilling ahead, and second-stage cement will provide zonal isolation for two hydrocarbon zones near the top of the liner. For 9 5/8in liner, due to the presence of a pressure ramp at the top of the section and weak formation at the bottom, managed pressure cementing (MPC) was the chosen approach to mitigate the risk of losses. MPC is a technique that enables cementation to be conducted in a hydrostatically underbalanced condition where surface backpressure (SBP) is applied to maintain the bottomhole pressure between the highest pore pressure and the lowest fracture pressure of the well. The combination of MPC and two-stage cementing, together with other existing best practices, formed an integrated solution in narrow margin cementing. This has resulted in flawless cementation for two water injector wells. No losses were observed during cement displacement, there was no gas migration, and the liner top packer was successfully set, and pressure tested in MPC mode. A subsequent cement log confirmed the top of cement requirement was fulfilled. The paper will further explain on how this unconventional technique were planned and executed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信