髋关节和膝关节置换术的监管概述

Anmol Wadhwa, S. Talegaonkar, H. Popli
{"title":"髋关节和膝关节置换术的监管概述","authors":"Anmol Wadhwa, S. Talegaonkar, H. Popli","doi":"10.2174/2213476X06666190823142403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nMedical device acceptance of patients has grown considerably in recent\nyears. This has question the effectiveness of the current regulatory frameworks to ensure the performance,\nsafety, and quality of new devices. This article focuses on the methodical overview on\nhip and knee joint replacement medical devices evaluating the procedure and proper analysis of\nmedical device regulation in three jurisdictions i.e. the United States of America (USA), EUROPE\nand INDIA, exploring reforms been laid to stabilize and meet the requirements of existing systems,\nand further analyse the additional actions which should be employed to fully meet this ultimate\ngoal.\n\n\n\n We analysed the hip and knee joint replacement medical device regulation system\nthrough a secondary research in United States, Europe and India in compliance with the updated\nnational regulatory authority’s legislative documents and requirements.\n\n\n\nThese three regulatory systems vary in their working, organization, acceptance for their\nspecific pre- and post-market evidence requirements, and transparency of process. The most challenging\nfactor remains the same for the countries which are to make sure safety and effectiveness\nof devices, proper monitoring of its use and important compliance information readiness employing\nquality management system towards new findings and acceptance for the users. A case study\nof Johnson & Johnson ASR Implant was also studied, highlighting the major reforms required and\nthe reforms introduced in the United States, Europe and India. Thus, quality and safety reforms\nare made to strengthen the premarket compliance requirements, enhancing the need of post-market\nregulation through proper traceability and monitoring of devices by employing the functioning\nmedical device registry.\n\n\n\nRecent reforms address the major challenges in device regulation, highlighting the\nneed to create connecting points between the device identifier system and existing data collection\ntools, such as electronic health records, and maintaining effective and up to date use of registries\nto ensure post-market use of new and existing devices.\n","PeriodicalId":8525,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Research, Clinical Trials and Regulatory Affairs","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Regulatory Overview of Hip And Knee Joint Replacement Devices\",\"authors\":\"Anmol Wadhwa, S. Talegaonkar, H. Popli\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/2213476X06666190823142403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nMedical device acceptance of patients has grown considerably in recent\\nyears. This has question the effectiveness of the current regulatory frameworks to ensure the performance,\\nsafety, and quality of new devices. This article focuses on the methodical overview on\\nhip and knee joint replacement medical devices evaluating the procedure and proper analysis of\\nmedical device regulation in three jurisdictions i.e. the United States of America (USA), EUROPE\\nand INDIA, exploring reforms been laid to stabilize and meet the requirements of existing systems,\\nand further analyse the additional actions which should be employed to fully meet this ultimate\\ngoal.\\n\\n\\n\\n We analysed the hip and knee joint replacement medical device regulation system\\nthrough a secondary research in United States, Europe and India in compliance with the updated\\nnational regulatory authority’s legislative documents and requirements.\\n\\n\\n\\nThese three regulatory systems vary in their working, organization, acceptance for their\\nspecific pre- and post-market evidence requirements, and transparency of process. The most challenging\\nfactor remains the same for the countries which are to make sure safety and effectiveness\\nof devices, proper monitoring of its use and important compliance information readiness employing\\nquality management system towards new findings and acceptance for the users. A case study\\nof Johnson & Johnson ASR Implant was also studied, highlighting the major reforms required and\\nthe reforms introduced in the United States, Europe and India. Thus, quality and safety reforms\\nare made to strengthen the premarket compliance requirements, enhancing the need of post-market\\nregulation through proper traceability and monitoring of devices by employing the functioning\\nmedical device registry.\\n\\n\\n\\nRecent reforms address the major challenges in device regulation, highlighting the\\nneed to create connecting points between the device identifier system and existing data collection\\ntools, such as electronic health records, and maintaining effective and up to date use of registries\\nto ensure post-market use of new and existing devices.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":8525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Clinical Research, Clinical Trials and Regulatory Affairs\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Clinical Research, Clinical Trials and Regulatory Affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/2213476X06666190823142403\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Research, Clinical Trials and Regulatory Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2213476X06666190823142403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

近年来,患者对医疗器械的接受程度有了显著提高。这对当前监管框架确保新器械性能、安全性和质量的有效性提出了质疑。本文着重于对髋关节和膝关节置换医疗器械的系统概述,评估美利坚合众国(美国),欧洲和印度三个司法管辖区的医疗器械监管程序和适当分析,探索为稳定和满足现有系统要求而制定的改革,并进一步分析应采取的额外行动,以充分实现这一最终目标。我们根据最新的国家监管机构的立法文件和要求,通过对美国、欧洲和印度的髋关节和膝关节置换医疗器械监管体系的二次研究,对其进行了分析。这三个监管体系在工作、组织、对其具体上市前和上市后证据要求的接受程度以及过程的透明度方面各不相同。对于国家来说,最具挑战性的因素仍然是相同的,即确保器械的安全性和有效性,对其使用进行适当的监控,并准备好重要的合规信息,采用质量管理体系来获得新的发现和用户的接受。还研究了强生ASR植入物的案例研究,突出了美国,欧洲和印度所需要的主要改革和改革。因此,进行了质量和安全改革,以加强上市前合规要求,通过使用有效的医疗器械注册表对器械进行适当的可追溯性和监测,加强上市后监管的需求。最近的改革解决了器械监管中的主要挑战,强调需要在器械标识系统和现有数据收集工具(如电子健康记录)之间创建连接点,并保持注册的有效和最新使用,以确保新设备和现有设备的上市后使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Regulatory Overview of Hip And Knee Joint Replacement Devices
Medical device acceptance of patients has grown considerably in recent years. This has question the effectiveness of the current regulatory frameworks to ensure the performance, safety, and quality of new devices. This article focuses on the methodical overview on hip and knee joint replacement medical devices evaluating the procedure and proper analysis of medical device regulation in three jurisdictions i.e. the United States of America (USA), EUROPE and INDIA, exploring reforms been laid to stabilize and meet the requirements of existing systems, and further analyse the additional actions which should be employed to fully meet this ultimate goal. We analysed the hip and knee joint replacement medical device regulation system through a secondary research in United States, Europe and India in compliance with the updated national regulatory authority’s legislative documents and requirements. These three regulatory systems vary in their working, organization, acceptance for their specific pre- and post-market evidence requirements, and transparency of process. The most challenging factor remains the same for the countries which are to make sure safety and effectiveness of devices, proper monitoring of its use and important compliance information readiness employing quality management system towards new findings and acceptance for the users. A case study of Johnson & Johnson ASR Implant was also studied, highlighting the major reforms required and the reforms introduced in the United States, Europe and India. Thus, quality and safety reforms are made to strengthen the premarket compliance requirements, enhancing the need of post-market regulation through proper traceability and monitoring of devices by employing the functioning medical device registry. Recent reforms address the major challenges in device regulation, highlighting the need to create connecting points between the device identifier system and existing data collection tools, such as electronic health records, and maintaining effective and up to date use of registries to ensure post-market use of new and existing devices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信