Ocuton-S自我血压计与Goldmann血压计;一项每日比较研究。

P. Kóthy, P. Vargha, G. Holló
{"title":"Ocuton-S自我血压计与Goldmann血压计;一项每日比较研究。","authors":"P. Kóthy, P. Vargha, G. Holló","doi":"10.1034/J.1600-0420.2001.790317.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nTo compare 24-hour diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained using the Ocuton-S applanation self tonometer and the Goldmann tonometer.\n\n\nMETHODS\n24-hour diurnal IOP curves were obtained on 14 eyes of 7 trained patients suffering from medically controlled primary open angle glaucoma. IOP was measured every third hour starting at 9 a.m. with a calibrated Goldmann tonometer; one week later, a similar set of measurements was obtained with Ocuton-S self tonometry by the patients. One week later still, ultrasound corneal pachymetry was performed at the same hours.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOverall IOP (24-hour mean) did not differ significantly between the different measuring techniques (ANOVA, p = 0.74), but the IOP differed in a statistically significant manner around the clock (ANOVA, p = 0.00006). The mean Goldmann tonometric readings were up to 2.8 mmHg lower than the Ocuton-S values during the daytime (9 a.m. to 9 p.m.), however, during the night (12 midnight to 6 a.m.) mean IOP measured with Goldmann tonometry was 2.2 to 3.3 mmHg higher than the corresponding average of the self tonometry readings. There was a statistically significant interaction between the type of tonometry and the time of the measurement (p = 0.0007). Central corneal thickness (CCT) showed a significant change during the 24-hour period (p = 0.000001).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nIOP shows a different diurnal curve when measured with the Goldmann tonometer and with the Ocuton-S applanation self tonometer. The instruments' readings might be influenced in different ways by the diurnal changes of the corneal thickness. Since Ocuton-S self tonometry underestimates the IOP in the early morning period, a careful evaluation is necessary when nocturnal and early morning IOP elevation is investigated with this technique.","PeriodicalId":7152,"journal":{"name":"Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ocuton-S self tonometry vs. Goldmann tonometry; a diurnal comparison study.\",\"authors\":\"P. Kóthy, P. Vargha, G. Holló\",\"doi\":\"10.1034/J.1600-0420.2001.790317.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE\\nTo compare 24-hour diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained using the Ocuton-S applanation self tonometer and the Goldmann tonometer.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\n24-hour diurnal IOP curves were obtained on 14 eyes of 7 trained patients suffering from medically controlled primary open angle glaucoma. IOP was measured every third hour starting at 9 a.m. with a calibrated Goldmann tonometer; one week later, a similar set of measurements was obtained with Ocuton-S self tonometry by the patients. One week later still, ultrasound corneal pachymetry was performed at the same hours.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nOverall IOP (24-hour mean) did not differ significantly between the different measuring techniques (ANOVA, p = 0.74), but the IOP differed in a statistically significant manner around the clock (ANOVA, p = 0.00006). The mean Goldmann tonometric readings were up to 2.8 mmHg lower than the Ocuton-S values during the daytime (9 a.m. to 9 p.m.), however, during the night (12 midnight to 6 a.m.) mean IOP measured with Goldmann tonometry was 2.2 to 3.3 mmHg higher than the corresponding average of the self tonometry readings. There was a statistically significant interaction between the type of tonometry and the time of the measurement (p = 0.0007). Central corneal thickness (CCT) showed a significant change during the 24-hour period (p = 0.000001).\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nIOP shows a different diurnal curve when measured with the Goldmann tonometer and with the Ocuton-S applanation self tonometer. The instruments' readings might be influenced in different ways by the diurnal changes of the corneal thickness. Since Ocuton-S self tonometry underestimates the IOP in the early morning period, a careful evaluation is necessary when nocturnal and early morning IOP elevation is investigated with this technique.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"32\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1034/J.1600-0420.2001.790317.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1034/J.1600-0420.2001.790317.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

摘要

目的比较Ocuton-S眼压仪和Goldmann眼压仪24小时的眼压测量值。方法对7例经训练的药物控制型原发性开角型青光眼患者14只眼进行24小时眼内压曲线测定。从上午9点开始,每隔3个小时用经校准的Goldmann眼压计测量眼压;一周后,患者用Ocuton-S自测血压计获得一组类似的测量结果。一周后,在同一时间进行超声角膜厚度测量。结果不同测量方法的总IOP(24小时平均值)差异无统计学意义(方差分析,p = 0.74),但IOP在24小时内差异有统计学意义(方差分析,p = 0.00006)。白天(上午9点至晚上9点),Goldmann血压计测量的平均IOP比Ocuton-S值低2.8 mmHg,然而,在夜间(午夜12点至早上6点),Goldmann血压计测量的平均IOP比自测血压计读数的相应平均值高2.2至3.3 mmHg。血压计类型与测量时间之间存在统计学上显著的交互作用(p = 0.0007)。角膜中央厚度(CCT)在24小时内发生显著变化(p = 0.000001)。结论Goldmann眼压仪与Ocuton-S眼压仪测量眼压的日变化曲线不同。角膜厚度的日变化可能以不同的方式影响仪器的读数。由于Ocuton-S自测眼压低估了清晨的眼压,因此在夜间和清晨使用该技术检查眼压升高时,需要仔细评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ocuton-S self tonometry vs. Goldmann tonometry; a diurnal comparison study.
PURPOSE To compare 24-hour diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained using the Ocuton-S applanation self tonometer and the Goldmann tonometer. METHODS 24-hour diurnal IOP curves were obtained on 14 eyes of 7 trained patients suffering from medically controlled primary open angle glaucoma. IOP was measured every third hour starting at 9 a.m. with a calibrated Goldmann tonometer; one week later, a similar set of measurements was obtained with Ocuton-S self tonometry by the patients. One week later still, ultrasound corneal pachymetry was performed at the same hours. RESULTS Overall IOP (24-hour mean) did not differ significantly between the different measuring techniques (ANOVA, p = 0.74), but the IOP differed in a statistically significant manner around the clock (ANOVA, p = 0.00006). The mean Goldmann tonometric readings were up to 2.8 mmHg lower than the Ocuton-S values during the daytime (9 a.m. to 9 p.m.), however, during the night (12 midnight to 6 a.m.) mean IOP measured with Goldmann tonometry was 2.2 to 3.3 mmHg higher than the corresponding average of the self tonometry readings. There was a statistically significant interaction between the type of tonometry and the time of the measurement (p = 0.0007). Central corneal thickness (CCT) showed a significant change during the 24-hour period (p = 0.000001). CONCLUSION IOP shows a different diurnal curve when measured with the Goldmann tonometer and with the Ocuton-S applanation self tonometer. The instruments' readings might be influenced in different ways by the diurnal changes of the corneal thickness. Since Ocuton-S self tonometry underestimates the IOP in the early morning period, a careful evaluation is necessary when nocturnal and early morning IOP elevation is investigated with this technique.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信