荷兰白兔和新西兰白兔胚胎发育研究中历史妊娠和胎儿数据的概率分析

Q Environmental Science
Lorraine M. Posobiec, Estella M. Cox, Howard M. Solomon, Elise M. Lewis, Kai-fen Wang, Dinesh Stanislaus
{"title":"荷兰白兔和新西兰白兔胚胎发育研究中历史妊娠和胎儿数据的概率分析","authors":"Lorraine M. Posobiec,&nbsp;Estella M. Cox,&nbsp;Howard M. Solomon,&nbsp;Elise M. Lewis,&nbsp;Kai-fen Wang,&nbsp;Dinesh Stanislaus","doi":"10.1002/bdrb.21173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Embryo-fetal development (EFD) studies, typically in pregnant rats and rabbits, are conducted prior to enrolling females of reproductive age in clinical trials. Common rabbit strains used are the New Zealand White (NZW) and Dutch Belted (DB). As fetal abnormalities can occur in all groups, including controls, Historical Control Data (HCD) is compiled using data from control groups of EFD studies, and is used along with each study's concurrent control group to help determine whether fetal abnormalities are caused by the test article or are part of background incidences. A probability analysis was conducted on 2014 HCD collected at Charles River Inc., Horsham PA on Covance NZW, Covance DB, and Charles River (CR) NZW rabbits. The analysis was designed to determine the probability of 2 or 3 out of a group of 22 does aborting their litter or of having a fetal abnormality by chance. Results demonstrate that pregnancy parameters and fetal observations differ not only between strains, but between sources of rabbits of the same strain. As a result the probability of these observations occurring by chance in two or three litters was drastically different. Although no one single strain is perfect, this analysis highlights the need to appreciate the inherent differences in pregnancy and fetal abnormalities between strains, and points out that an apparent isolated increased incidence of an observation in one strain will not necessarily be test-article related in another strain. A robust HCD is critical for interpretation of EFD rabbit studies, regardless of the rabbit strain used</p>","PeriodicalId":9120,"journal":{"name":"Birth defects research. Part B, Developmental and reproductive toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/bdrb.21173","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Probability Analysis of Historical Pregnancy and Fetal Data from Dutch Belted and New Zealand White Rabbit Strains from Embryo–Fetal Development Studies\",\"authors\":\"Lorraine M. Posobiec,&nbsp;Estella M. Cox,&nbsp;Howard M. Solomon,&nbsp;Elise M. Lewis,&nbsp;Kai-fen Wang,&nbsp;Dinesh Stanislaus\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bdrb.21173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Embryo-fetal development (EFD) studies, typically in pregnant rats and rabbits, are conducted prior to enrolling females of reproductive age in clinical trials. Common rabbit strains used are the New Zealand White (NZW) and Dutch Belted (DB). As fetal abnormalities can occur in all groups, including controls, Historical Control Data (HCD) is compiled using data from control groups of EFD studies, and is used along with each study's concurrent control group to help determine whether fetal abnormalities are caused by the test article or are part of background incidences. A probability analysis was conducted on 2014 HCD collected at Charles River Inc., Horsham PA on Covance NZW, Covance DB, and Charles River (CR) NZW rabbits. The analysis was designed to determine the probability of 2 or 3 out of a group of 22 does aborting their litter or of having a fetal abnormality by chance. Results demonstrate that pregnancy parameters and fetal observations differ not only between strains, but between sources of rabbits of the same strain. As a result the probability of these observations occurring by chance in two or three litters was drastically different. Although no one single strain is perfect, this analysis highlights the need to appreciate the inherent differences in pregnancy and fetal abnormalities between strains, and points out that an apparent isolated increased incidence of an observation in one strain will not necessarily be test-article related in another strain. A robust HCD is critical for interpretation of EFD rabbit studies, regardless of the rabbit strain used</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Birth defects research. Part B, Developmental and reproductive toxicology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/bdrb.21173\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Birth defects research. Part B, Developmental and reproductive toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdrb.21173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth defects research. Part B, Developmental and reproductive toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdrb.21173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

胚胎-胎儿发育(EFD)研究通常在怀孕的大鼠和兔子中进行,在临床试验中招募育龄女性之前进行。常用的兔种是新西兰白兔(NZW)和荷兰白兔(DB)。由于胎儿异常可能发生在所有组中,包括对照组,历史对照数据(HCD)是使用EFD研究的对照组数据编制的,并与每个研究的并发对照组一起使用,以帮助确定胎儿异常是由测试品引起的还是背景事件的一部分。对Charles River Inc.、Horsham PA收集的2014年HCD对Covance NZW、Covance DB和Charles River (CR) NZW家兔进行概率分析。该分析旨在确定22只母熊中有2或3只流产的概率,或者偶然出现胎儿畸形的概率。结果表明,妊娠参数和胎儿观察结果不仅在菌株之间存在差异,而且在同一菌株的家兔来源之间也存在差异。因此,在两窝或三窝中偶然出现这些观察结果的概率是截然不同的。虽然没有一种菌株是完美的,但这一分析强调了认识到菌株之间妊娠和胎儿异常的内在差异的必要性,并指出在一种菌株中明显分离的观察发生率增加不一定与另一种菌株的试验品相关。无论使用何种家兔品系,强健的HCD对于家兔EFD研究的解释至关重要
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Probability Analysis of Historical Pregnancy and Fetal Data from Dutch Belted and New Zealand White Rabbit Strains from Embryo–Fetal Development Studies

Embryo-fetal development (EFD) studies, typically in pregnant rats and rabbits, are conducted prior to enrolling females of reproductive age in clinical trials. Common rabbit strains used are the New Zealand White (NZW) and Dutch Belted (DB). As fetal abnormalities can occur in all groups, including controls, Historical Control Data (HCD) is compiled using data from control groups of EFD studies, and is used along with each study's concurrent control group to help determine whether fetal abnormalities are caused by the test article or are part of background incidences. A probability analysis was conducted on 2014 HCD collected at Charles River Inc., Horsham PA on Covance NZW, Covance DB, and Charles River (CR) NZW rabbits. The analysis was designed to determine the probability of 2 or 3 out of a group of 22 does aborting their litter or of having a fetal abnormality by chance. Results demonstrate that pregnancy parameters and fetal observations differ not only between strains, but between sources of rabbits of the same strain. As a result the probability of these observations occurring by chance in two or three litters was drastically different. Although no one single strain is perfect, this analysis highlights the need to appreciate the inherent differences in pregnancy and fetal abnormalities between strains, and points out that an apparent isolated increased incidence of an observation in one strain will not necessarily be test-article related in another strain. A robust HCD is critical for interpretation of EFD rabbit studies, regardless of the rabbit strain used

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.65
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The purpose of this journal is to publish original contributions describing the toxicity of chemicals to developing organisms and the process of reproduction. The scope of the journal will inlcude: • toxicity of new chemical entities and biotechnology derived products to developing organismal systems; • toxicity of these and other xenobiotic agents to reproductive function; • multi-generation studies; • endocrine-mediated toxicity, particularly for endpoints that are relevant to development and reproduction; • novel protocols for evaluating developmental and reproductive toxicity; Part B: Developmental and Reproductive Toxicology , formerly published as Teratogenesis, Carcinogenesis and Mutagenesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信