利用熔融沉积建模技术,通过微ct扫描获得生物支架的3D打印特性和机械性能

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Natalia González-Sánchez, Nicole Jensen-Líos, Diana Hernández-Montoya, José Esteban Campos Zumbado, Jorge Oviedo-Quirós
{"title":"利用熔融沉积建模技术,通过微ct扫描获得生物支架的3D打印特性和机械性能","authors":"Natalia González-Sánchez, Nicole Jensen-Líos, Diana Hernández-Montoya, José Esteban Campos Zumbado, Jorge Oviedo-Quirós","doi":"10.15517/ijds.2022.52671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective is to determine which biopolymer has the best 3D printing characteristics and mechanical properties for the manufacture of a bioscaffold, using the fused deposition printing technique, with models generated from a Micro-CT Scan. Through an experimental exploratory study, the 3D printing of a bioscaffold was carried out using the fused deposition modeling (FDM) technique, from an STL file obtained from a Micro-CT scan taken from a bovine iliac crest bone structure Three study groups of the analyzed biopolymers were carried out with thirteen printed structures of each one. The first is made of 100% PLA. The second, 90B, is composed of 20g of polylactic acid per 1g of diatom extract, and the third, 88C, differs from the previous one in that it also contains 1g of calcium phosphate. The 39 printed structures underwent a visual inspection test, which required the fabrication of a gold standard scaffold in resin, with greater detail and similarity to the scanned bone structure. Finally, the structures were subjected to a compressive force (N) to obtain the modulus of elasticity (MPa) and compressive strength (MPa) of each one of them. A statistically significant difference (p=0.001) was obtained in the printing properties of the biomaterial 88C, compared to 90B and pure PLA. The 88C biopolymer presented the best 3D printing characteristics using the fused deposition printing technique, from stereolithographic models obtained with Micro-CT Scan. In addition, the 88C biopolymer presented the best mechanical properties compared to the other groups of materials. Although the difference between these was not statistically significant (p=0.388), in the structures of the 88C biomaterial, values of compressive strength (8,84692 MPa) and modulus of elasticity (43,23615 MPa) were similar to those of cancellous bone in the jaws could be observed. In conclusion, the biomaterial that exhibited the best printing and mechanical characteristics to produce a 3D printed bio scaffold using the fused deposition technique from stereolithographic models obtained from a Micro-CT Scan was the 88C biopolymer. Because of this result, the 88C biomaterial has the potential to be used in the manufacture of bioscaffolds in tissue engineering.","PeriodicalId":19450,"journal":{"name":"Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"3D Printing Characteristics and Mechanical Properties of a Bio Scaffold Obtained from a Micro-CT Scan, Using the Fused Deposition Modeling Technique\",\"authors\":\"Natalia González-Sánchez, Nicole Jensen-Líos, Diana Hernández-Montoya, José Esteban Campos Zumbado, Jorge Oviedo-Quirós\",\"doi\":\"10.15517/ijds.2022.52671\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective is to determine which biopolymer has the best 3D printing characteristics and mechanical properties for the manufacture of a bioscaffold, using the fused deposition printing technique, with models generated from a Micro-CT Scan. Through an experimental exploratory study, the 3D printing of a bioscaffold was carried out using the fused deposition modeling (FDM) technique, from an STL file obtained from a Micro-CT scan taken from a bovine iliac crest bone structure Three study groups of the analyzed biopolymers were carried out with thirteen printed structures of each one. The first is made of 100% PLA. The second, 90B, is composed of 20g of polylactic acid per 1g of diatom extract, and the third, 88C, differs from the previous one in that it also contains 1g of calcium phosphate. The 39 printed structures underwent a visual inspection test, which required the fabrication of a gold standard scaffold in resin, with greater detail and similarity to the scanned bone structure. Finally, the structures were subjected to a compressive force (N) to obtain the modulus of elasticity (MPa) and compressive strength (MPa) of each one of them. A statistically significant difference (p=0.001) was obtained in the printing properties of the biomaterial 88C, compared to 90B and pure PLA. The 88C biopolymer presented the best 3D printing characteristics using the fused deposition printing technique, from stereolithographic models obtained with Micro-CT Scan. In addition, the 88C biopolymer presented the best mechanical properties compared to the other groups of materials. Although the difference between these was not statistically significant (p=0.388), in the structures of the 88C biomaterial, values of compressive strength (8,84692 MPa) and modulus of elasticity (43,23615 MPa) were similar to those of cancellous bone in the jaws could be observed. In conclusion, the biomaterial that exhibited the best printing and mechanical characteristics to produce a 3D printed bio scaffold using the fused deposition technique from stereolithographic models obtained from a Micro-CT Scan was the 88C biopolymer. Because of this result, the 88C biomaterial has the potential to be used in the manufacture of bioscaffolds in tissue engineering.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.2022.52671\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.2022.52671","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的是确定哪种生物聚合物具有最佳的3D打印特性和机械性能,用于制造生物支架,使用熔融沉积打印技术,并通过Micro-CT扫描生成模型。通过一项实验性探索性研究,利用融合沉积建模(FDM)技术,从牛髂骨骨结构的Micro-CT扫描获得的STL文件中进行了生物支架的3D打印。第一种是100% PLA。第二种是90B,每1g硅藻提取物中含有20g聚乳酸;第三种是88C,与前一种不同的是,它还含有1g磷酸钙。这39个打印的骨骼结构经过了视觉检查测试,这需要用树脂制造一个金标准支架,与扫描的骨骼结构有更大的细节和相似性。最后,对各结构施加一个压缩力(N),得到各结构的弹性模量(MPa)和抗压强度(MPa)。与90B和纯PLA相比,生物材料88C的打印性能有统计学意义(p=0.001)。使用熔融沉积打印技术,从Micro-CT扫描获得的立体光刻模型中,88C生物聚合物呈现出最佳的3D打印特性。此外,88C生物聚合物与其他材料相比,表现出最好的力学性能。虽然两者之间的差异无统计学意义(p=0.388),但在88C生物材料的结构中,抗压强度(8,84692 MPa)和弹性模量(43,23615 MPa)与颌骨松质骨相似。综上所述,使用熔融沉积技术从Micro-CT扫描获得的立体光刻模型中获得3D打印生物支架,88C生物聚合物表现出最佳的打印和机械特性。由于这一结果,88C生物材料具有用于组织工程生物支架制造的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
3D Printing Characteristics and Mechanical Properties of a Bio Scaffold Obtained from a Micro-CT Scan, Using the Fused Deposition Modeling Technique
The objective is to determine which biopolymer has the best 3D printing characteristics and mechanical properties for the manufacture of a bioscaffold, using the fused deposition printing technique, with models generated from a Micro-CT Scan. Through an experimental exploratory study, the 3D printing of a bioscaffold was carried out using the fused deposition modeling (FDM) technique, from an STL file obtained from a Micro-CT scan taken from a bovine iliac crest bone structure Three study groups of the analyzed biopolymers were carried out with thirteen printed structures of each one. The first is made of 100% PLA. The second, 90B, is composed of 20g of polylactic acid per 1g of diatom extract, and the third, 88C, differs from the previous one in that it also contains 1g of calcium phosphate. The 39 printed structures underwent a visual inspection test, which required the fabrication of a gold standard scaffold in resin, with greater detail and similarity to the scanned bone structure. Finally, the structures were subjected to a compressive force (N) to obtain the modulus of elasticity (MPa) and compressive strength (MPa) of each one of them. A statistically significant difference (p=0.001) was obtained in the printing properties of the biomaterial 88C, compared to 90B and pure PLA. The 88C biopolymer presented the best 3D printing characteristics using the fused deposition printing technique, from stereolithographic models obtained with Micro-CT Scan. In addition, the 88C biopolymer presented the best mechanical properties compared to the other groups of materials. Although the difference between these was not statistically significant (p=0.388), in the structures of the 88C biomaterial, values of compressive strength (8,84692 MPa) and modulus of elasticity (43,23615 MPa) were similar to those of cancellous bone in the jaws could be observed. In conclusion, the biomaterial that exhibited the best printing and mechanical characteristics to produce a 3D printed bio scaffold using the fused deposition technique from stereolithographic models obtained from a Micro-CT Scan was the 88C biopolymer. Because of this result, the 88C biomaterial has the potential to be used in the manufacture of bioscaffolds in tissue engineering.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences
Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信