用户参与新的移动解决方案的创造性设计:一项探索性研究

P. Richard, Jean-Marie Burkhardt, T. Lubart
{"title":"用户参与新的移动解决方案的创造性设计:一项探索性研究","authors":"P. Richard, Jean-Marie Burkhardt, T. Lubart","doi":"10.1145/2637248.2637258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As transportation is one of the main environmental concerns, design of new solutions in this area constitutes a priority for the European Union. This study aims to compare different factors of user involvement in design in terms of obtained contributions of users, whether positive or negative. Based on the Critical Incidents Technique, we interviewed 23 experts (especially in transportation), asking them to describe their positive and negative experiences when they collaborated with users in design projects. This resulted in the collection of 71 Critical Incidents (40 positive and 31 negative) that were then characterized along 6 coding categories. We conducted a Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA) on the corresponding contingency table and found two main axes that structured the incidents. The interpretation of the axes indicated that individual user involvement allows obtaining rich information about users' needs whereas collective user involvement allows enhancing user acceptance. Moreover, users involved at later stages of development suggest mainly ideas for service improvement, whereas users involved at earlier stages of innovation suggest creative ideas provided that they are supplied tools to develop their projection skills.","PeriodicalId":93284,"journal":{"name":"ECCE ... : proceedings of the ... European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics. European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics","volume":"36 1","pages":"21: 1-21: 7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Users' participation to creative design of new solutions for mobility: An exploratory study\",\"authors\":\"P. Richard, Jean-Marie Burkhardt, T. Lubart\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2637248.2637258\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As transportation is one of the main environmental concerns, design of new solutions in this area constitutes a priority for the European Union. This study aims to compare different factors of user involvement in design in terms of obtained contributions of users, whether positive or negative. Based on the Critical Incidents Technique, we interviewed 23 experts (especially in transportation), asking them to describe their positive and negative experiences when they collaborated with users in design projects. This resulted in the collection of 71 Critical Incidents (40 positive and 31 negative) that were then characterized along 6 coding categories. We conducted a Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA) on the corresponding contingency table and found two main axes that structured the incidents. The interpretation of the axes indicated that individual user involvement allows obtaining rich information about users' needs whereas collective user involvement allows enhancing user acceptance. Moreover, users involved at later stages of development suggest mainly ideas for service improvement, whereas users involved at earlier stages of innovation suggest creative ideas provided that they are supplied tools to develop their projection skills.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ECCE ... : proceedings of the ... European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics. European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"21: 1-21: 7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ECCE ... : proceedings of the ... European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics. European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2637248.2637258\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ECCE ... : proceedings of the ... European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics. European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2637248.2637258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

由于交通是主要的环境问题之一,在这一领域设计新的解决办法是欧洲联盟的优先事项。本研究旨在比较用户参与设计的不同因素对用户获得的贡献,无论是积极的还是消极的。基于关键事件技术,我们采访了23位专家(特别是在交通领域),请他们描述他们在设计项目中与用户合作时的积极和消极经验。这导致收集了71个关键事件(40个阳性事件和31个阴性事件),然后按照6个编码类别进行表征。我们对相应的列联表进行了多重对应分析(MCA),发现了构成事件的两个主要轴。对轴的解释表明,个人用户参与可以获得关于用户需求的丰富信息,而集体用户参与可以提高用户接受度。此外,参与后期发展阶段的用户主要提出改进服务的想法,而参与早期创新阶段的用户则提出创造性的想法,只要向他们提供发展其投射技能的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Users' participation to creative design of new solutions for mobility: An exploratory study
As transportation is one of the main environmental concerns, design of new solutions in this area constitutes a priority for the European Union. This study aims to compare different factors of user involvement in design in terms of obtained contributions of users, whether positive or negative. Based on the Critical Incidents Technique, we interviewed 23 experts (especially in transportation), asking them to describe their positive and negative experiences when they collaborated with users in design projects. This resulted in the collection of 71 Critical Incidents (40 positive and 31 negative) that were then characterized along 6 coding categories. We conducted a Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA) on the corresponding contingency table and found two main axes that structured the incidents. The interpretation of the axes indicated that individual user involvement allows obtaining rich information about users' needs whereas collective user involvement allows enhancing user acceptance. Moreover, users involved at later stages of development suggest mainly ideas for service improvement, whereas users involved at earlier stages of innovation suggest creative ideas provided that they are supplied tools to develop their projection skills.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信