硫酸盐模拟物对硝酸盐还原菌/硝酸盐处理效率的提高

Kiran Gawas, Dana Safarin, H. Riley, J. Ogle
{"title":"硫酸盐模拟物对硝酸盐还原菌/硝酸盐处理效率的提高","authors":"Kiran Gawas, Dana Safarin, H. Riley, J. Ogle","doi":"10.2118/191773-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Hydraulic fracturing in the Marcellus Shale play has moved to produced water only scenarios because of prohibitive water disposal costs. Well completion under produced water only conditions increases the demand on chemical additive performance. In addition, water reuse selects deleterious microorganisms through natural selection, which may increase the likelihood of formation souring. Conventional biocides are typically used to mitigate these risks, but to some extent, they present health, safety, and environmental (HSE) concerns. In addition, several conventional biocides have side reactions with sulfide, notably tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium sulfate (THPS) and 2,2-dibromo-3-nitrilopropionamide (DBNPA). This paper describes an improved method for the effective control of deleterious microorganisms without the use of conventional biocides.\n An environmentally friendly system that includes nitrate-reducing bacteria (NRB) coupled with nitrate co-introduction was previously shown to mitigate souring as effectively as a biocide alternative for more than 1,000 assets. The NRB inhibit growth of the deleterious sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) primarily by competing for the available carbon source if the source is limited. This paper describes an improved NRB/nitrate system that incorporates a sulfate analog, which presumably inhibits dissimilatory sulfate reduction and enhances mitigation. Laboratory experiments were performed to measure the amount of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) produced in field brine samples inoculated with SRB. The improved NRB/nitrate system was shown to inhibit the production of H2S under worst-case scenarios in laboratory competitive exclusion experiments.\n Results for the new treatment at four trial wells are presented. Sulfate-reducing bacteria populations, acid-reducing bacteria populations, and a gaseous H2S concentration were monitored over three months and were found to satisfy the operator's set key performance indicators. Overall, the amount of chemical required for treatment was reduced for this improved system, which substantially reduced the operator costs to treat the wells.\n The combination of chemistries with mutually exclusive cellular targets highlights the value of synergistic effects, specifically reducing system cost to treat while retaining low aquatic toxicity, as compared to traditional biocides used in the oilfield.","PeriodicalId":11155,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Thu, September 06, 2018","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved Efficiency of a Nitrate Reducing Bacteria/Nitrate Treatment by the Incorporation of a Sulfate Analog\",\"authors\":\"Kiran Gawas, Dana Safarin, H. Riley, J. Ogle\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/191773-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Hydraulic fracturing in the Marcellus Shale play has moved to produced water only scenarios because of prohibitive water disposal costs. Well completion under produced water only conditions increases the demand on chemical additive performance. In addition, water reuse selects deleterious microorganisms through natural selection, which may increase the likelihood of formation souring. Conventional biocides are typically used to mitigate these risks, but to some extent, they present health, safety, and environmental (HSE) concerns. In addition, several conventional biocides have side reactions with sulfide, notably tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium sulfate (THPS) and 2,2-dibromo-3-nitrilopropionamide (DBNPA). This paper describes an improved method for the effective control of deleterious microorganisms without the use of conventional biocides.\\n An environmentally friendly system that includes nitrate-reducing bacteria (NRB) coupled with nitrate co-introduction was previously shown to mitigate souring as effectively as a biocide alternative for more than 1,000 assets. The NRB inhibit growth of the deleterious sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) primarily by competing for the available carbon source if the source is limited. This paper describes an improved NRB/nitrate system that incorporates a sulfate analog, which presumably inhibits dissimilatory sulfate reduction and enhances mitigation. Laboratory experiments were performed to measure the amount of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) produced in field brine samples inoculated with SRB. The improved NRB/nitrate system was shown to inhibit the production of H2S under worst-case scenarios in laboratory competitive exclusion experiments.\\n Results for the new treatment at four trial wells are presented. Sulfate-reducing bacteria populations, acid-reducing bacteria populations, and a gaseous H2S concentration were monitored over three months and were found to satisfy the operator's set key performance indicators. Overall, the amount of chemical required for treatment was reduced for this improved system, which substantially reduced the operator costs to treat the wells.\\n The combination of chemistries with mutually exclusive cellular targets highlights the value of synergistic effects, specifically reducing system cost to treat while retaining low aquatic toxicity, as compared to traditional biocides used in the oilfield.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Thu, September 06, 2018\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Thu, September 06, 2018\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/191773-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Thu, September 06, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/191773-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于水处理成本过高,Marcellus页岩的水力压裂已经转向只使用采出水。仅在采出水条件下完井增加了对化学添加剂性能的要求。此外,回用水通过自然选择选择了有害微生物,这可能会增加地层酸败的可能性。传统的杀菌剂通常用于减轻这些风险,但在某种程度上,它们存在健康、安全和环境(HSE)问题。此外,一些传统的杀菌剂与硫化物有副反应,特别是四(羟甲基)硫酸磷(THPS)和2,2-二溴-3-硝基丙酰胺(DBNPA)。本文介绍了一种不使用常规杀菌剂而有效控制有害微生物的改进方法。一种环境友好型系统,包括硝酸盐还原细菌(NRB)和硝酸盐的共同引入,此前已被证明可以像杀菌剂一样有效地缓解酸败,适用于1000多种资产。NRB抑制有害硫酸盐还原菌(SRB)的生长主要是通过竞争可利用的碳源(如果碳源有限)。本文描述了一种改进的NRB/硝酸盐系统,其中包含硫酸盐类似物,可能会抑制异化硫酸盐还原并增强缓解。通过室内实验,测定了接种SRB后的大田卤水样品中硫化氢(H2S)的产生量。在实验室竞争排斥实验中,改进的NRB/硝酸盐体系在最坏情况下抑制了H2S的产生。介绍了四口试验井的新处理效果。对硫酸盐还原菌种群、酸还原菌种群和气态H2S浓度进行了三个多月的监测,发现它们满足了作业者设定的关键性能指标。总的来说,改进后的系统减少了处理所需的化学药剂用量,大大降低了作业者处理井的成本。与油田中使用的传统杀菌剂相比,化学物质与相互排斥的细胞靶标的结合突出了协同效应的价值,特别是降低了系统处理成本,同时保持了较低的水生毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improved Efficiency of a Nitrate Reducing Bacteria/Nitrate Treatment by the Incorporation of a Sulfate Analog
Hydraulic fracturing in the Marcellus Shale play has moved to produced water only scenarios because of prohibitive water disposal costs. Well completion under produced water only conditions increases the demand on chemical additive performance. In addition, water reuse selects deleterious microorganisms through natural selection, which may increase the likelihood of formation souring. Conventional biocides are typically used to mitigate these risks, but to some extent, they present health, safety, and environmental (HSE) concerns. In addition, several conventional biocides have side reactions with sulfide, notably tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium sulfate (THPS) and 2,2-dibromo-3-nitrilopropionamide (DBNPA). This paper describes an improved method for the effective control of deleterious microorganisms without the use of conventional biocides. An environmentally friendly system that includes nitrate-reducing bacteria (NRB) coupled with nitrate co-introduction was previously shown to mitigate souring as effectively as a biocide alternative for more than 1,000 assets. The NRB inhibit growth of the deleterious sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) primarily by competing for the available carbon source if the source is limited. This paper describes an improved NRB/nitrate system that incorporates a sulfate analog, which presumably inhibits dissimilatory sulfate reduction and enhances mitigation. Laboratory experiments were performed to measure the amount of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) produced in field brine samples inoculated with SRB. The improved NRB/nitrate system was shown to inhibit the production of H2S under worst-case scenarios in laboratory competitive exclusion experiments. Results for the new treatment at four trial wells are presented. Sulfate-reducing bacteria populations, acid-reducing bacteria populations, and a gaseous H2S concentration were monitored over three months and were found to satisfy the operator's set key performance indicators. Overall, the amount of chemical required for treatment was reduced for this improved system, which substantially reduced the operator costs to treat the wells. The combination of chemistries with mutually exclusive cellular targets highlights the value of synergistic effects, specifically reducing system cost to treat while retaining low aquatic toxicity, as compared to traditional biocides used in the oilfield.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信