服用抗疟药物的男性受试者红细胞基因型(HBAA、HBAS和HBSS)的渗透脆弱性比较

PAUL CHIDOKA CHIKEZIE, A. Uwakwe, C. Monago
{"title":"服用抗疟药物的男性受试者红细胞基因型(HBAA、HBAS和HBSS)的渗透脆弱性比较","authors":"PAUL CHIDOKA CHIKEZIE, A. Uwakwe, C. Monago","doi":"10.4314/JOPHAS.V6I3.48507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In vivo study was carried out to ascertain the mean corpuscular fragility (MCF) index and corresponding stability of three erythrocyte genotypes (HbAA, HbAS and HbSS) in male volunteers, before (control; t=0 hour) and after (tests; i.e. at t=3, 6 and 18 hours) of administration of five (5) antimalarial drugs (FansidarTM, HalfanTM, quinine, CoartemTM, and chloroquine phosphate). Clinically confirmed healthy non-malarious and malarious male subjects/volunteers enrolled for this study. Erythrocytes obtained from these individuals were suspended in two separate sets of phosphate buffer saline (PBS) solutions of decreasing concentrations in the following order: 0.9, 0.7, 0.6, 0.4, 0.3 and 0.2 g/100 ml. Spectrophotometric method was used to determine the level of erythrocyte osmotic fragility. The mean (± S.D) MCF values of the three genotypes were in the order: HbAA there was no significant difference (p>0.05) between the MCF values of HbAA and HbAS erythrocytes. Comparatively, parasitized erythrocytes exhibited significantly (p redox equilibrium of the red cells are agents of membrane  destabilization.","PeriodicalId":16719,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical and Allied Sciences","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compararive osmotic fragility of erythrocyte genotypes (HBAA, HBAS and HBSS) of male subjects administered antimalarial drugs\",\"authors\":\"PAUL CHIDOKA CHIKEZIE, A. Uwakwe, C. Monago\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/JOPHAS.V6I3.48507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In vivo study was carried out to ascertain the mean corpuscular fragility (MCF) index and corresponding stability of three erythrocyte genotypes (HbAA, HbAS and HbSS) in male volunteers, before (control; t=0 hour) and after (tests; i.e. at t=3, 6 and 18 hours) of administration of five (5) antimalarial drugs (FansidarTM, HalfanTM, quinine, CoartemTM, and chloroquine phosphate). Clinically confirmed healthy non-malarious and malarious male subjects/volunteers enrolled for this study. Erythrocytes obtained from these individuals were suspended in two separate sets of phosphate buffer saline (PBS) solutions of decreasing concentrations in the following order: 0.9, 0.7, 0.6, 0.4, 0.3 and 0.2 g/100 ml. Spectrophotometric method was used to determine the level of erythrocyte osmotic fragility. The mean (± S.D) MCF values of the three genotypes were in the order: HbAA there was no significant difference (p>0.05) between the MCF values of HbAA and HbAS erythrocytes. Comparatively, parasitized erythrocytes exhibited significantly (p redox equilibrium of the red cells are agents of membrane  destabilization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical and Allied Sciences\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical and Allied Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/JOPHAS.V6I3.48507\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical and Allied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/JOPHAS.V6I3.48507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过体内研究,确定男性志愿者三种红细胞基因型(HbAA、HbAS和HbSS)在对照前的平均红细胞脆性(MCF)指数和相应的稳定性;T =0小时)和之后(试验;即在t= 3,6和18小时)服用五(5)种抗疟药物(FansidarTM、HalfanTM、奎宁、CoartemTM和磷酸氯喹)。临床确认的健康非疟疾和疟疾男性受试者/志愿者参加了这项研究。将这些人的红细胞分别悬浮在两组浓度递减的磷酸缓冲盐水(PBS)溶液中,浓度依次为:0.9、0.7、0.6、0.4、0.3和0.2 g/100 ml。用分光光度法测定红细胞渗透脆性水平。三种基因型的平均(±S.D) MCF值依次为:HbAA。HbAA与HbAS红细胞的MCF值无显著差异(p < 0.05)。相比之下,寄生红细胞表现出明显的氧化还原平衡,红细胞是膜不稳定的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Compararive osmotic fragility of erythrocyte genotypes (HBAA, HBAS and HBSS) of male subjects administered antimalarial drugs
In vivo study was carried out to ascertain the mean corpuscular fragility (MCF) index and corresponding stability of three erythrocyte genotypes (HbAA, HbAS and HbSS) in male volunteers, before (control; t=0 hour) and after (tests; i.e. at t=3, 6 and 18 hours) of administration of five (5) antimalarial drugs (FansidarTM, HalfanTM, quinine, CoartemTM, and chloroquine phosphate). Clinically confirmed healthy non-malarious and malarious male subjects/volunteers enrolled for this study. Erythrocytes obtained from these individuals were suspended in two separate sets of phosphate buffer saline (PBS) solutions of decreasing concentrations in the following order: 0.9, 0.7, 0.6, 0.4, 0.3 and 0.2 g/100 ml. Spectrophotometric method was used to determine the level of erythrocyte osmotic fragility. The mean (± S.D) MCF values of the three genotypes were in the order: HbAA there was no significant difference (p>0.05) between the MCF values of HbAA and HbAS erythrocytes. Comparatively, parasitized erythrocytes exhibited significantly (p redox equilibrium of the red cells are agents of membrane  destabilization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信