{"title":"戏剧手稿，传播媒介，莎士比亚的亨利五世","authors":"G. Taylor","doi":"10.1086/721096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"F more than a century, The Chronicle History of Henry the fift has been almost universally regarded as a “bad quarto.” In fact, it was a charter member of that category, included in the 1909 initial articulation of the distinction between “good” and “bad” quartos by A.W. Pollard. The five original “bad quartos” were Romeo and Juliet (1597), Henry the fift (1600), Sir Iohn Falstaff and the Merry Wiues of Windsor (1602),","PeriodicalId":22928,"journal":{"name":"The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America","volume":"16 1","pages":"343 - 378"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Play Manuscripts, Vectors of Transmission, and Shakespeare’s Henry the fifth\",\"authors\":\"G. Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/721096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"F more than a century, The Chronicle History of Henry the fift has been almost universally regarded as a “bad quarto.” In fact, it was a charter member of that category, included in the 1909 initial articulation of the distinction between “good” and “bad” quartos by A.W. Pollard. The five original “bad quartos” were Romeo and Juliet (1597), Henry the fift (1600), Sir Iohn Falstaff and the Merry Wiues of Windsor (1602),\",\"PeriodicalId\":22928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"343 - 378\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/721096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/721096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Play Manuscripts, Vectors of Transmission, and Shakespeare’s Henry the fifth
F more than a century, The Chronicle History of Henry the fift has been almost universally regarded as a “bad quarto.” In fact, it was a charter member of that category, included in the 1909 initial articulation of the distinction between “good” and “bad” quartos by A.W. Pollard. The five original “bad quartos” were Romeo and Juliet (1597), Henry the fift (1600), Sir Iohn Falstaff and the Merry Wiues of Windsor (1602),
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
