在患有严重和持续性精神疾病的非裔美国人中实施基于社区的参与性研究:一项定性研究

IF 0.9 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Lindsay Sheehan, Sonya Ballentine, Lorenzo Washington, Mark Canser, John Connor, Renee Jones, Edward Laster, Khalilah Muhammad, Scott Noble, Rhonda Smith, Gary Walley, Carla Kundert, Patrick Corrigan
{"title":"在患有严重和持续性精神疾病的非裔美国人中实施基于社区的参与性研究:一项定性研究","authors":"Lindsay Sheehan, Sonya Ballentine, Lorenzo Washington, Mark Canser, John Connor, Renee Jones, Edward Laster, Khalilah Muhammad, Scott Noble, Rhonda Smith, Gary Walley, Carla Kundert, Patrick Corrigan","doi":"10.5130/IJCRE.V14I1.6894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is an approach that involves community members in research, not as research participants, but as partners. However, few studies have examined CBPR projects conducted among African Americans with serious and persistent mental illness (SPMI). This article focuses specifically on the Inspiring Change (IC) model, which includes a leadership trio comprised of an academic researcher, health service provider and an African American with lived experience of SPMI. Our purpose is to investigate how the IC model shapes not only how research is conducted but how research is understood and experienced by the community. We achieve this purpose by (1) describing an innovative CBPR model and pilot projects that involved African Americans with SPMI in all stages of the research project; and (2) presenting findings from qualitative interviews conducted with CBPR team members about strengths, challenges and leadership particular to this model of CBPR, an area rarely explored in CBPR literature. \nWith the guidance of an advisory board and the manualised IC curriculum, two CBPR teams initiated and conducted nine-month long research projects focusing on health disparities for African Americans with SPMI. Members of the two CBPR teams (n = 13), which included individuals with lived experience, service providers and researchers, completed qualitative interviews. Benefits of CBPR projects included opportunities to learn, a sense of purpose in helping others and increased trust of research participants. Challenges pertained to disorganisation of leadership, lack of transparency with compensation, time pressures and interpersonal conflicts. These challenges highlight the importance of preparing and supporting those from both academic and lived experience backgrounds in skills necessary to thrive in leadership roles for CBPR projects.","PeriodicalId":53967,"journal":{"name":"Gateways-International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing community-based participatory research among African Americans with serious and persistent mental illness: A qualitative study\",\"authors\":\"Lindsay Sheehan, Sonya Ballentine, Lorenzo Washington, Mark Canser, John Connor, Renee Jones, Edward Laster, Khalilah Muhammad, Scott Noble, Rhonda Smith, Gary Walley, Carla Kundert, Patrick Corrigan\",\"doi\":\"10.5130/IJCRE.V14I1.6894\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is an approach that involves community members in research, not as research participants, but as partners. However, few studies have examined CBPR projects conducted among African Americans with serious and persistent mental illness (SPMI). This article focuses specifically on the Inspiring Change (IC) model, which includes a leadership trio comprised of an academic researcher, health service provider and an African American with lived experience of SPMI. Our purpose is to investigate how the IC model shapes not only how research is conducted but how research is understood and experienced by the community. We achieve this purpose by (1) describing an innovative CBPR model and pilot projects that involved African Americans with SPMI in all stages of the research project; and (2) presenting findings from qualitative interviews conducted with CBPR team members about strengths, challenges and leadership particular to this model of CBPR, an area rarely explored in CBPR literature. \\nWith the guidance of an advisory board and the manualised IC curriculum, two CBPR teams initiated and conducted nine-month long research projects focusing on health disparities for African Americans with SPMI. Members of the two CBPR teams (n = 13), which included individuals with lived experience, service providers and researchers, completed qualitative interviews. Benefits of CBPR projects included opportunities to learn, a sense of purpose in helping others and increased trust of research participants. Challenges pertained to disorganisation of leadership, lack of transparency with compensation, time pressures and interpersonal conflicts. These challenges highlight the importance of preparing and supporting those from both academic and lived experience backgrounds in skills necessary to thrive in leadership roles for CBPR projects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gateways-International Journal of Community Research and Engagement\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gateways-International Journal of Community Research and Engagement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5130/IJCRE.V14I1.6894\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gateways-International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5130/IJCRE.V14I1.6894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)是一种让社区成员参与研究的方法,不是作为研究参与者,而是作为伙伴。然而,很少有研究调查了在患有严重和持续性精神疾病(SPMI)的非裔美国人中进行的CBPR项目。本文特别关注鼓舞人心的变革(IC)模式,其中包括一个由学术研究人员、卫生服务提供者和一个有SPMI生活经验的非洲裔美国人组成的领导三人组。我们的目的是调查IC模型如何不仅影响研究的进行方式,而且影响社区对研究的理解和体验。我们通过以下方式实现了这一目标:(1)描述了一个创新的CBPR模型和试点项目,在研究项目的所有阶段都涉及非裔美国人的SPMI;(2)通过对CBPR团队成员进行定性访谈,了解该模型的优势、挑战和领导力,这是CBPR文献中很少探讨的领域。在一个咨询委员会的指导和手册化的综合教育课程的指导下,两个社区卫生政策小组发起并开展了为期9个月的研究项目,重点关注患有SPMI的非裔美国人的健康差异。两个CBPR小组的成员(n = 13),包括有生活经验的个人、服务提供者和研究人员,完成了定性访谈。CBPR项目的好处包括学习的机会、帮助他人的使命感和增加研究参与者的信任。挑战涉及领导混乱、薪酬缺乏透明度、时间压力和人际冲突。这些挑战突出了准备和支持那些具有学术和生活经验背景的人在CBPR项目中担任领导角色所必需的技能的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementing community-based participatory research among African Americans with serious and persistent mental illness: A qualitative study
Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is an approach that involves community members in research, not as research participants, but as partners. However, few studies have examined CBPR projects conducted among African Americans with serious and persistent mental illness (SPMI). This article focuses specifically on the Inspiring Change (IC) model, which includes a leadership trio comprised of an academic researcher, health service provider and an African American with lived experience of SPMI. Our purpose is to investigate how the IC model shapes not only how research is conducted but how research is understood and experienced by the community. We achieve this purpose by (1) describing an innovative CBPR model and pilot projects that involved African Americans with SPMI in all stages of the research project; and (2) presenting findings from qualitative interviews conducted with CBPR team members about strengths, challenges and leadership particular to this model of CBPR, an area rarely explored in CBPR literature. With the guidance of an advisory board and the manualised IC curriculum, two CBPR teams initiated and conducted nine-month long research projects focusing on health disparities for African Americans with SPMI. Members of the two CBPR teams (n = 13), which included individuals with lived experience, service providers and researchers, completed qualitative interviews. Benefits of CBPR projects included opportunities to learn, a sense of purpose in helping others and increased trust of research participants. Challenges pertained to disorganisation of leadership, lack of transparency with compensation, time pressures and interpersonal conflicts. These challenges highlight the importance of preparing and supporting those from both academic and lived experience backgrounds in skills necessary to thrive in leadership roles for CBPR projects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
28.60%
发文量
5
审稿时长
34 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信