利用Ns-3和SUMO研究vanet的路由问题

M. Abdellatif, Omar Aly
{"title":"利用Ns-3和SUMO研究vanet的路由问题","authors":"M. Abdellatif, Omar Aly","doi":"10.12720/jcm.17.9.682-690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks VANETs are normally sparse, highly dense, and highly mobile with many different and ever-changing topologies. These characteristics impose a challenge on finding a routing algorithm that fits the requirements of such network. The aim of this work is to study the performance issues of VANETs under different scenarios using realistic mobility models. In this paper, a comparative study is done among Ad-hoc On- Demand Distance Vector (AODV), Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR) and position-based routing protocols, namely Greedy Perimeter stateless routing (GPSR), and Max duration Min angle GPSR (MMGPSR). The comparison is done using key quality of service QoS metrics such as average routing goodput, end-to-end delay, MacPhy overhead, and packet delivery ratio PDR. The study is conducted using Network Simulator 3 (NS3) and SUMO.","PeriodicalId":14832,"journal":{"name":"J. Comput. Mediat. Commun.","volume":"20 1","pages":"682-690"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Studying Routing Issues in Vanets Using Ns-3 and SUMO\",\"authors\":\"M. Abdellatif, Omar Aly\",\"doi\":\"10.12720/jcm.17.9.682-690\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks VANETs are normally sparse, highly dense, and highly mobile with many different and ever-changing topologies. These characteristics impose a challenge on finding a routing algorithm that fits the requirements of such network. The aim of this work is to study the performance issues of VANETs under different scenarios using realistic mobility models. In this paper, a comparative study is done among Ad-hoc On- Demand Distance Vector (AODV), Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR) and position-based routing protocols, namely Greedy Perimeter stateless routing (GPSR), and Max duration Min angle GPSR (MMGPSR). The comparison is done using key quality of service QoS metrics such as average routing goodput, end-to-end delay, MacPhy overhead, and packet delivery ratio PDR. The study is conducted using Network Simulator 3 (NS3) and SUMO.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"J. Comput. Mediat. Commun.\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"682-690\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"J. Comput. Mediat. Commun.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12720/jcm.17.9.682-690\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Comput. Mediat. Commun.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12720/jcm.17.9.682-690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

车辆自组织网络vanet通常是稀疏的、高密度的、具有许多不同的和不断变化的拓扑结构的高度移动性。这些特点给寻找符合这种网络要求的路由算法带来了挑战。本工作的目的是利用真实的移动模型研究VANETs在不同场景下的性能问题。本文对自组网按需距离矢量(AODV)、优化链路状态路由(OLSR)和位置路由协议贪婪周长无状态路由(GPSR)、最大持续时间最小角度GPSR (MMGPSR)进行了比较研究。比较是使用关键的服务质量QoS指标来完成的,比如平均路由good - put、端到端延迟、MacPhy开销和包交付率PDR。研究使用网络模拟器3 (NS3)和SUMO进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Studying Routing Issues in Vanets Using Ns-3 and SUMO
Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks VANETs are normally sparse, highly dense, and highly mobile with many different and ever-changing topologies. These characteristics impose a challenge on finding a routing algorithm that fits the requirements of such network. The aim of this work is to study the performance issues of VANETs under different scenarios using realistic mobility models. In this paper, a comparative study is done among Ad-hoc On- Demand Distance Vector (AODV), Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR) and position-based routing protocols, namely Greedy Perimeter stateless routing (GPSR), and Max duration Min angle GPSR (MMGPSR). The comparison is done using key quality of service QoS metrics such as average routing goodput, end-to-end delay, MacPhy overhead, and packet delivery ratio PDR. The study is conducted using Network Simulator 3 (NS3) and SUMO.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信