如何利用四维有限元分析模型避免扩眼作业中井底钻具组合扭脱问题

Olzhas Zhandayev, Gaukharbek Ungaliyev, Biju James
{"title":"如何利用四维有限元分析模型避免扩眼作业中井底钻具组合扭脱问题","authors":"Olzhas Zhandayev, Gaukharbek Ungaliyev, Biju James","doi":"10.2118/195213-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Historically underreaming while drilling (UWD) operations were implemented in offshore field in Azerbaijan to decrease Equivalent Circulating Density (ECD) and have better hole quality for casing running. Lithology in this UWD, 8.5 × 10.25-inch section consists of sand and shales with 3-5kpsi Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS). Well trajectory has planned dogleg severity up to 3-3.5 deg/30m. In such a condition underreaming operations are known to be more challenging and complex compared to conventional drilling with bit only. In the offset well, an operator had fatigue related twist off at the reamer's lower sub connection which contributed to 58 hours of NPT.\n Our challenge was to come up with the root cause of the twist off and then suggest changes in BHA to avoid this and prove that the modified BHA performs as expected. Our finite element analysis (FEA) based 4D modeling software can identify different vibrations (axial, lateral, stick slip), bending stresses and bending moment of each component in the BHA. Using this software, we were able to come up with the root cause of the twist off, which was due to high bending stress.\n In UWD there are two cutting structures in the BHA, so optimizing both cutting structures has a significant impact on the overall performance. Successful run key points are to analyze the underreamer placement in BHA, operating parameters selection for different scenarios (when both bit and undereamer are in the same rocks or when the bit is in soft and undereamer is in hard rock), lateral vibrations and whirling phenomenon which can potentially damage and develop fatigue on BHA components. Multiple BHA's were simulated and based on the results the most stable BHA was recommended for the upcoming well.\n The operator implemented the recommended BHA and a total of 1200m was successfully drilled and opened in one run without any NPT. All directional requirements were achieved and both bit and underreamer came out in good condition which confirmed that the new optimized BHA was stable in the downhole drilling conditions. The liner was also run without any issue confirming the borehole quality.\n This paper will review the results of analysis and how modeling prediction was validated in the field.","PeriodicalId":11150,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, April 10, 2019","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to Avoid Bottom Hole Assembly Twist Off Challenges in Underreaming While Drilling Operations Using 4D Finite Element Analysis Modelling\",\"authors\":\"Olzhas Zhandayev, Gaukharbek Ungaliyev, Biju James\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/195213-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Historically underreaming while drilling (UWD) operations were implemented in offshore field in Azerbaijan to decrease Equivalent Circulating Density (ECD) and have better hole quality for casing running. Lithology in this UWD, 8.5 × 10.25-inch section consists of sand and shales with 3-5kpsi Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS). Well trajectory has planned dogleg severity up to 3-3.5 deg/30m. In such a condition underreaming operations are known to be more challenging and complex compared to conventional drilling with bit only. In the offset well, an operator had fatigue related twist off at the reamer's lower sub connection which contributed to 58 hours of NPT.\\n Our challenge was to come up with the root cause of the twist off and then suggest changes in BHA to avoid this and prove that the modified BHA performs as expected. Our finite element analysis (FEA) based 4D modeling software can identify different vibrations (axial, lateral, stick slip), bending stresses and bending moment of each component in the BHA. Using this software, we were able to come up with the root cause of the twist off, which was due to high bending stress.\\n In UWD there are two cutting structures in the BHA, so optimizing both cutting structures has a significant impact on the overall performance. Successful run key points are to analyze the underreamer placement in BHA, operating parameters selection for different scenarios (when both bit and undereamer are in the same rocks or when the bit is in soft and undereamer is in hard rock), lateral vibrations and whirling phenomenon which can potentially damage and develop fatigue on BHA components. Multiple BHA's were simulated and based on the results the most stable BHA was recommended for the upcoming well.\\n The operator implemented the recommended BHA and a total of 1200m was successfully drilled and opened in one run without any NPT. All directional requirements were achieved and both bit and underreamer came out in good condition which confirmed that the new optimized BHA was stable in the downhole drilling conditions. The liner was also run without any issue confirming the borehole quality.\\n This paper will review the results of analysis and how modeling prediction was validated in the field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Wed, April 10, 2019\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Wed, April 10, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/195213-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, April 10, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/195213-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随钻扩眼(UWD)作业一直在阿塞拜疆海上油田实施,以降低当量循环密度(ECD),并提高套管下入的井眼质量。该UWD的8.5 × 10.25英寸段的岩性由砂和页岩组成,无侧限抗压强度(UCS)为3-5kpsi。井眼轨迹的狗腿深度可达3-3.5°/30m。在这种情况下,与传统的单钻头钻井相比,扩眼作业更具挑战性和复杂性。在邻井中,一家作业者在扩眼器下部接头处发生了与疲劳相关的扭断,造成58小时的NPT。我们面临的挑战是找出造成扭转的根本原因,然后建议对BHA进行更改,以避免这种情况,并证明修改后的BHA具有预期的性能。基于有限元分析(FEA)的4D建模软件可以识别BHA中每个组件的不同振动(轴向、横向、粘滑)、弯曲应力和弯矩。使用这个软件,我们能够找到扭转脱落的根本原因,这是由于高弯曲应力。在UWD中,底部钻具组合有两种切削结构,因此优化两种切削结构对整体性能有重大影响。成功下入的关键是分析扩眼器在BHA中的位置,不同情况下的操作参数选择(钻头和扩眼器在同一岩石中,或者钻头在软岩石中,扩眼器在硬岩石中),横向振动和旋转现象,这些现象可能会损坏BHA组件并导致疲劳。对多个BHA进行了模拟,并根据结果为即将投产的井推荐了最稳定的BHA。作业者采用了推荐的底部钻具组合,一次下入成功钻开了1200米的井段,没有发生任何NPT。所有的定向要求都得到了满足,钻头和扩眼器都处于良好的状态,这证实了新的优化BHA在井下钻井条件下是稳定的。尾管下入也没有出现任何问题,证实了井眼质量。本文将回顾分析结果以及如何在现场验证建模预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How to Avoid Bottom Hole Assembly Twist Off Challenges in Underreaming While Drilling Operations Using 4D Finite Element Analysis Modelling
Historically underreaming while drilling (UWD) operations were implemented in offshore field in Azerbaijan to decrease Equivalent Circulating Density (ECD) and have better hole quality for casing running. Lithology in this UWD, 8.5 × 10.25-inch section consists of sand and shales with 3-5kpsi Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS). Well trajectory has planned dogleg severity up to 3-3.5 deg/30m. In such a condition underreaming operations are known to be more challenging and complex compared to conventional drilling with bit only. In the offset well, an operator had fatigue related twist off at the reamer's lower sub connection which contributed to 58 hours of NPT. Our challenge was to come up with the root cause of the twist off and then suggest changes in BHA to avoid this and prove that the modified BHA performs as expected. Our finite element analysis (FEA) based 4D modeling software can identify different vibrations (axial, lateral, stick slip), bending stresses and bending moment of each component in the BHA. Using this software, we were able to come up with the root cause of the twist off, which was due to high bending stress. In UWD there are two cutting structures in the BHA, so optimizing both cutting structures has a significant impact on the overall performance. Successful run key points are to analyze the underreamer placement in BHA, operating parameters selection for different scenarios (when both bit and undereamer are in the same rocks or when the bit is in soft and undereamer is in hard rock), lateral vibrations and whirling phenomenon which can potentially damage and develop fatigue on BHA components. Multiple BHA's were simulated and based on the results the most stable BHA was recommended for the upcoming well. The operator implemented the recommended BHA and a total of 1200m was successfully drilled and opened in one run without any NPT. All directional requirements were achieved and both bit and underreamer came out in good condition which confirmed that the new optimized BHA was stable in the downhole drilling conditions. The liner was also run without any issue confirming the borehole quality. This paper will review the results of analysis and how modeling prediction was validated in the field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信