《艺术、代码和转码:重新审视伊迪丝·沃顿(1920)和马丁·斯科塞斯(1993)的《纯真年代》中的符号学对话》

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
F. Sammarcelli
{"title":"《艺术、代码和转码:重新审视伊迪丝·沃顿(1920)和马丁·斯科塞斯(1993)的《纯真年代》中的符号学对话》","authors":"F. Sammarcelli","doi":"10.5325/editwharrevi.36.2.0125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This essay explores the inscription of codes and intersemiotics in Wharton's The Age of Innocence and its 1993 adaptation by Martin Scorsese, and analyzes the effects derived from them. It begins by showing how the sense of ironical distance that prevails in the first chapters of the novel is redefined in the film, especially in the brilliant title sequence and opening scene that set a different tone, more likely to trigger identification with the characters and produce emotion, instead of underscoring convention. Apart from the opera motif, other intersemiotic connections that function differently in the book and its adaptation deserve to be examined. Thus the essay studies how pictorial quotations abound in the film, more than in Wharton's novel, especially works by James Tissot that convey a sense of ambiguity, while other paintings are related to the transcoding of violence and mystery. It then discusses the subversive emphasis on frames and framing and the reference to tableau vivant, before dwelling on facets of textual and filmic reflexivity.","PeriodicalId":40904,"journal":{"name":"Edith Wharton Review","volume":"15 1","pages":"125 - 147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Of Art, Codes, and Transcoding: Revisiting Intersemiotic Conversations in The Age of Innocence by Edith Wharton (1920) and Martin Scorsese (1993)\",\"authors\":\"F. Sammarcelli\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/editwharrevi.36.2.0125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This essay explores the inscription of codes and intersemiotics in Wharton's The Age of Innocence and its 1993 adaptation by Martin Scorsese, and analyzes the effects derived from them. It begins by showing how the sense of ironical distance that prevails in the first chapters of the novel is redefined in the film, especially in the brilliant title sequence and opening scene that set a different tone, more likely to trigger identification with the characters and produce emotion, instead of underscoring convention. Apart from the opera motif, other intersemiotic connections that function differently in the book and its adaptation deserve to be examined. Thus the essay studies how pictorial quotations abound in the film, more than in Wharton's novel, especially works by James Tissot that convey a sense of ambiguity, while other paintings are related to the transcoding of violence and mystery. It then discusses the subversive emphasis on frames and framing and the reference to tableau vivant, before dwelling on facets of textual and filmic reflexivity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Edith Wharton Review\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"125 - 147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Edith Wharton Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/editwharrevi.36.2.0125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AMERICAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edith Wharton Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/editwharrevi.36.2.0125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文探讨了沃顿的《纯真年代》及其1993年马丁·斯科塞斯的改编作品中符码和符号学的铭文,并分析了它们所产生的影响。它首先展示了小说前几章普遍存在的讽刺距离感是如何在电影中被重新定义的,尤其是在精彩的标题序列和开场场景中,它们设定了不同的基调,更有可能引发对人物的认同,产生情感,而不是强调传统。除了歌剧主题外,其他在本书及其改编中发挥不同作用的符号学联系值得研究。因此,本文研究了电影中大量的绘画引用,比沃顿的小说中更多,尤其是詹姆斯·天梭的作品,传达了一种模棱两可的感觉,而其他绘画则与暴力和神秘的转码有关。然后讨论了对框架和框架的颠覆性强调以及对生动画面的参考,然后再讨论文本和电影反身性的各个方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Of Art, Codes, and Transcoding: Revisiting Intersemiotic Conversations in The Age of Innocence by Edith Wharton (1920) and Martin Scorsese (1993)
Abstract:This essay explores the inscription of codes and intersemiotics in Wharton's The Age of Innocence and its 1993 adaptation by Martin Scorsese, and analyzes the effects derived from them. It begins by showing how the sense of ironical distance that prevails in the first chapters of the novel is redefined in the film, especially in the brilliant title sequence and opening scene that set a different tone, more likely to trigger identification with the characters and produce emotion, instead of underscoring convention. Apart from the opera motif, other intersemiotic connections that function differently in the book and its adaptation deserve to be examined. Thus the essay studies how pictorial quotations abound in the film, more than in Wharton's novel, especially works by James Tissot that convey a sense of ambiguity, while other paintings are related to the transcoding of violence and mystery. It then discusses the subversive emphasis on frames and framing and the reference to tableau vivant, before dwelling on facets of textual and filmic reflexivity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Edith Wharton Review
Edith Wharton Review LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信