催眠调节行为测量和对外部和内部意识的主观评价

Q Medicine
Athena Demertzi , Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse , Quentin Noirhomme , Marie-Elisabeth Faymonville , Steven Laureys
{"title":"催眠调节行为测量和对外部和内部意识的主观评价","authors":"Athena Demertzi ,&nbsp;Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse ,&nbsp;Quentin Noirhomme ,&nbsp;Marie-Elisabeth Faymonville ,&nbsp;Steven Laureys","doi":"10.1016/j.jphysparis.2015.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In altered subjective states, the behavioural quantification of external and internal awareness remains challenging due to the need for reports on the subjects’ behalf. With the aim to characterize the behavioural counterpart of external and internal awareness in a modified subjective condition, we used hypnosis during which subjects remain fully responsive. Eleven right-handed subjects reached a satisfactory level of hypnotisability as evidenced by subjective reports on arousal, absorption and dissociation. Compared to normal wakefulness, in hypnosis (a) participants’ self-ratings for internal awareness increased and self-ratings for external awareness decreased, (b) the two awareness components tended to anticorrelate less and the switches between external and internal awareness self-ratings were less frequent, and (c) participants’ reaction times were higher and lapses in key presses were more frequent. The identified imbalance between the two components of awareness is considered as of functional relevance to subjective (meta)cognition, possibly mediated by allocated attentional properties brought about by hypnosis. Our results highlight the presence of a cognitive counterpart in resting state, indicate that the modified contents of awareness are measurable behaviourally, and provide leverage for investigations of more challenging altered conscious states, such as anaesthesia, sleep and disorders of consciousness.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50087,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiology-Paris","volume":"109 4","pages":"Pages 173-179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2015.11.002","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hypnosis modulates behavioural measures and subjective ratings about external and internal awareness\",\"authors\":\"Athena Demertzi ,&nbsp;Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse ,&nbsp;Quentin Noirhomme ,&nbsp;Marie-Elisabeth Faymonville ,&nbsp;Steven Laureys\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jphysparis.2015.11.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In altered subjective states, the behavioural quantification of external and internal awareness remains challenging due to the need for reports on the subjects’ behalf. With the aim to characterize the behavioural counterpart of external and internal awareness in a modified subjective condition, we used hypnosis during which subjects remain fully responsive. Eleven right-handed subjects reached a satisfactory level of hypnotisability as evidenced by subjective reports on arousal, absorption and dissociation. Compared to normal wakefulness, in hypnosis (a) participants’ self-ratings for internal awareness increased and self-ratings for external awareness decreased, (b) the two awareness components tended to anticorrelate less and the switches between external and internal awareness self-ratings were less frequent, and (c) participants’ reaction times were higher and lapses in key presses were more frequent. The identified imbalance between the two components of awareness is considered as of functional relevance to subjective (meta)cognition, possibly mediated by allocated attentional properties brought about by hypnosis. Our results highlight the presence of a cognitive counterpart in resting state, indicate that the modified contents of awareness are measurable behaviourally, and provide leverage for investigations of more challenging altered conscious states, such as anaesthesia, sleep and disorders of consciousness.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physiology-Paris\",\"volume\":\"109 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 173-179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2015.11.002\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physiology-Paris\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928425715000200\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiology-Paris","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928425715000200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

在改变的主观状态下,由于需要代表受试者进行报告,外部和内部意识的行为量化仍然具有挑战性。为了在修改主观条件下表征外部和内部意识的行为对应物,我们使用了催眠,在此期间受试者保持完全反应。11名右撇子受试者达到了令人满意的可催眠性水平,这可以从唤醒、吸收和分离的主观报告中得到证明。与正常清醒状态相比,在催眠状态下,(a)被试的内部意识自我评分增加,外部意识自我评分下降;(b)两种意识成分的反相关倾向减弱,外部意识和内部意识自我评分之间的切换频率降低;(c)被试的反应时间增加,按键失误次数增加。意识的两个组成部分之间的不平衡被认为是与主观(元)认知的功能相关,可能是由催眠带来的分配注意特性介导的。我们的研究结果强调了静息状态下认知对口物的存在,表明改变的意识内容在行为上是可测量的,并为研究更具挑战性的改变的意识状态(如麻醉、睡眠和意识障碍)提供了杠杆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hypnosis modulates behavioural measures and subjective ratings about external and internal awareness

In altered subjective states, the behavioural quantification of external and internal awareness remains challenging due to the need for reports on the subjects’ behalf. With the aim to characterize the behavioural counterpart of external and internal awareness in a modified subjective condition, we used hypnosis during which subjects remain fully responsive. Eleven right-handed subjects reached a satisfactory level of hypnotisability as evidenced by subjective reports on arousal, absorption and dissociation. Compared to normal wakefulness, in hypnosis (a) participants’ self-ratings for internal awareness increased and self-ratings for external awareness decreased, (b) the two awareness components tended to anticorrelate less and the switches between external and internal awareness self-ratings were less frequent, and (c) participants’ reaction times were higher and lapses in key presses were more frequent. The identified imbalance between the two components of awareness is considered as of functional relevance to subjective (meta)cognition, possibly mediated by allocated attentional properties brought about by hypnosis. Our results highlight the presence of a cognitive counterpart in resting state, indicate that the modified contents of awareness are measurable behaviourally, and provide leverage for investigations of more challenging altered conscious states, such as anaesthesia, sleep and disorders of consciousness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Physiology-Paris
Journal of Physiology-Paris 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
2.02
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Each issue of the Journal of Physiology (Paris) is specially commissioned, and provides an overview of one important area of neuroscience, delivering review and research papers from leading researchers in that field. The content will interest both those specializing in the experimental study of the brain and those working in interdisciplinary fields linking theory and biological data, including cellular neuroscience, mathematical analysis of brain function, computational neuroscience, biophysics of brain imaging and cognitive psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信