回复adonis franeskou的回复

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

On the Horizon Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.21638/2226-5260-2020-9-1-366-372

A. Yampolskaya

{"title":"回复adonis franeskou的回复","authors":"A. Yampolskaya","doi":"10.21638/2226-5260-2020-9-1-366-372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is my short reply to Adonis Frangeskou’s response to my review of his book (2017). I offer a careful reading of the passage from Levinas quoted in Frangeskou’s response. I discuss the idea of God-in-me in connection with the issues of sensibility, vulnerability, and suffering. I argue that interpreting Levinas within the framework of the analytics of the sublime is crucially important for the catastrophic dimension of Levinas’ approach to subjectivity.","PeriodicalId":47013,"journal":{"name":"On the Horizon","volume":"21 1","pages":"366-372"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"REPLY TO ADONIS FRANGESKOU’S RESPONSE\",\"authors\":\"A. Yampolskaya\",\"doi\":\"10.21638/2226-5260-2020-9-1-366-372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This is my short reply to Adonis Frangeskou’s response to my review of his book (2017). I offer a careful reading of the passage from Levinas quoted in Frangeskou’s response. I discuss the idea of God-in-me in connection with the issues of sensibility, vulnerability, and suffering. I argue that interpreting Levinas within the framework of the analytics of the sublime is crucially important for the catastrophic dimension of Levinas’ approach to subjectivity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"On the Horizon\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"366-372\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"On the Horizon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2020-9-1-366-372\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"On the Horizon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2020-9-1-366-372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

这是我对阿多尼斯·弗兰格斯库(Adonis Frangeskou)对我对他的书(2017)的评论的简短回复。我对弗兰格斯库的回答中引用的列维纳斯的一段话进行了仔细的解读。我在感性、脆弱和痛苦的问题上讨论了“我内在的上帝”的概念。我认为，在崇高分析的框架内解释列维纳斯，对于列维纳斯主体性方法的灾难性维度是至关重要的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

REPLY TO ADONIS FRANGESKOU’S RESPONSE

This is my short reply to Adonis Frangeskou’s response to my review of his book (2017). I offer a careful reading of the passage from Levinas quoted in Frangeskou’s response. I discuss the idea of God-in-me in connection with the issues of sensibility, vulnerability, and suffering. I argue that interpreting Levinas within the framework of the analytics of the sublime is crucially important for the catastrophic dimension of Levinas’ approach to subjectivity.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

On the Horizon EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

4.50

自引率

6.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： On the Horizon provides an insight into how the changing face of technology is making it possible for educational institutions to form new relationships across geographic and cultural boundaries.