{"title":"通用分区定义在TLC诉Elgin案中被裁定违宪","authors":"Julie A. Tappendorf","doi":"10.1080/15480755.2014.937143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Last year, a federal district court ruled that a municipality could not require a faith-based organization to apply for and obtain a temporary use permit in order to operate its mobile pregnancy counseling services. At issue in The Life Center, Inc. v. City of Elgin was the constitutionality of the city's temporary use regulations that restricted the number of days a particular temporary usecould operate in a year. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois found the city's temporary use regulations, as well as its zoning definitions of “land use” and “structure,” to be unconstitutionally vague and overbroad because the regulations could prevent people from exercising protected First Amendment rights. Although the court's ruling applied only to the City of Elgin's zoning code, it should cause concern among municipalities across the country who would likely find similar temporary use regulations and zoning definitions in their own codes.","PeriodicalId":41184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","volume":"69 1","pages":"4 - 8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Common Zoning Definitions Found Unconstitutional in TLC v. Elgin\",\"authors\":\"Julie A. Tappendorf\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15480755.2014.937143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Last year, a federal district court ruled that a municipality could not require a faith-based organization to apply for and obtain a temporary use permit in order to operate its mobile pregnancy counseling services. At issue in The Life Center, Inc. v. City of Elgin was the constitutionality of the city's temporary use regulations that restricted the number of days a particular temporary usecould operate in a year. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois found the city's temporary use regulations, as well as its zoning definitions of “land use” and “structure,” to be unconstitutionally vague and overbroad because the regulations could prevent people from exercising protected First Amendment rights. Although the court's ruling applied only to the City of Elgin's zoning code, it should cause concern among municipalities across the country who would likely find similar temporary use regulations and zoning definitions in their own codes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"4 - 8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15480755.2014.937143\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15480755.2014.937143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
去年,一家联邦地区法院裁定,市政当局不得要求宗教组织申请并获得临时使用许可证,以开展其流动怀孕咨询服务。在The Life Center, Inc.诉埃尔金市(City of Elgin)一案中,争论的焦点是该市的临时使用规定是否符合宪法,该规定限制了某一特定临时使用场所在一年内可以运营的天数。美国伊利诺斯州北区地方法院认为,该市的临时使用规定,以及其对“土地使用”和“结构”的分区定义,含糊不清,过于宽泛,违反了宪法,因为这些规定可能会阻止人们行使受第一修正案保护的权利。虽然法院的裁决只适用于埃尔金市的分区法规,但它应该引起全国各地市政当局的关注,他们可能会在自己的法规中找到类似的临时使用规定和分区定义。
Common Zoning Definitions Found Unconstitutional in TLC v. Elgin
Abstract Last year, a federal district court ruled that a municipality could not require a faith-based organization to apply for and obtain a temporary use permit in order to operate its mobile pregnancy counseling services. At issue in The Life Center, Inc. v. City of Elgin was the constitutionality of the city's temporary use regulations that restricted the number of days a particular temporary usecould operate in a year. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois found the city's temporary use regulations, as well as its zoning definitions of “land use” and “structure,” to be unconstitutionally vague and overbroad because the regulations could prevent people from exercising protected First Amendment rights. Although the court's ruling applied only to the City of Elgin's zoning code, it should cause concern among municipalities across the country who would likely find similar temporary use regulations and zoning definitions in their own codes.